Villanueva-De la Cruz I, Villanueva-De la Cruz E, Arnao-Degollar VA, Vega-Gonzales EO

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page:
PDF size: 172.46 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Background: the appropriate use of virtuality in education improves the perception of higher level students in the field of health. On this basis, it can be assumed that the use of self-regulated learning strategies in virtual environments should improve academic satisfaction.
Objective: to determine which are the self-regulation strategies for learning in virtual environments that most influence the academic satisfaction of students at a higher technical level.
Methods: a descriptive correlational research with a quantitative approach was carried out at the Institute of Higher Education of Metropolitan Lima. The following theoretical methods were used: analysis-synthesis and induction-deduction; and empirical ones: the survey, using as instruments the Self-regulated learning scale in virtual contexts and academic satisfaction scale questionnaires applied during the month of July 2022.
Results: the students surveyed had a high level of control strategies (60.4%), motivational attributions (44.1%), collaborative work (45.0%) and advisor support (49.5%); and 60.4% had a high level of academic satisfaction. The bivariate analysis showed that the four strategies analyzed significantly influenced the level of academic satisfaction; However, in the multivariate analysis, only the advisor's support maintained a significant value.
Conclusions: students who use more self-regulated learning strategies in virtual environments have a higher level of academic satisfaction; the advisor's support turned out to be the most influential in achieving it.

REFERENCES

1. Sáiz MC, Almeida LS, Martín LJ, Carbonero MA, Valdivieso JA. Teacher Training Effectiveness in Self-Regulation in Virtual Environments. Front Psychol [Internet]. 2022 [citado 11/11/2023];13:776-806. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.776806

2. Costa Ó, García Ó. El aprendizaje autorregulado y las estrategias de aprendizaje. Tendencias pedagógicas [Internet]. 2017 [citado 11/11/2023];30(2017):117-130. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.15366/tp2017.30.007

3. Lengetti E, Kronk R, Cantrell MA. A theory analysis of Mastery Learning and Self-Regulation. Nurse Education in Practice [Internet]. 2020 [citado 11/11/2023];49:e102911. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102911

4. Barreto FJ, Álvarez J. Estrategias de autorregulación del aprendizaje y rendimiento académico en estudiantes de bachillerato. Rev Estud e Investig en Psicol y Educ [Internet]. 2020 [citado 11/11/2023];7(2):[aprox. 16 p.]. Disponible en: https://revistas.udc.es/index.php/reipe/article/view/reipe.2020.7.2.65704.

5. Pinto C, Ortiz-Salgado R, Mendoza CLM, Alvarado MY, Sanz PL. Cuestionario de autorregulación del aprendizaje en línea. Estudio de validez y fiabilidad de la versión en español. Estud Pedagog [Internet]. 2020 [citado 11/11/2023];46(2):[aprox. 17 p.]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.17979/reipe.2020.7.2.6570

6. Berridi R, Martínez JI. Estrategias de autorregulación en contextos virtuales de aprendizaje. Perfiles Educ [Internet]. 2017 [citado 11/11/2023];39(156):[aprox. 14 p.]. Disponible en: https://perfileseducativos.unam.mx/iisue_pe/index.php/perfiles/article/view/582856.

7. Insunza B, Ortiz L, Pérez C, Torres G, Mc Coll P, Meyer A, et al. Estructura Factorial y Confiabilidad del Cuestionario de Satisfacción Académica en Estudiantes de Medicina Chilenos. Rev Iberoam Diagnostico y Eval Psicol [Internet]. 2015 [citado 11/11/2023];1(40):73-82. Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=4596454320087.

8. Vergara J, Valle MD, Díaz A, Pérez MV. Adaptación de la Escala de Satisfacción Académica en Estudiantes Universitarios Chilenos. Psicol Educ [Internet]. 2018 [citado 11/11/2023];24(2):[aprox. 7 p. ]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.5093/psed2018a15

9. García I, Bustos RB. La autorregulación del aprendizaje en tiempos de pandemia: una alternativa viable en el marco de los procesos educativos actuales. Diálogos sobre Educ [Internet]. 2021 [citado 11/11/2023];(22):[aprox. 14 p.]. Disponible en: http://dialogossobreeducacion.cucsh.udg.mx/index.php/DSE/article/view/9149.

10. Mora CT, Mahecha JC, Conejo F. Procesos de autorregulación del aprendizaje y desempeño académico en estudiantes de pregrado bajo la modalidad virtual. Cult Educ y Soc [Internet]. 2020 [citado 11/11/2023];11(2):191-206. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.17981/cultedusoc.11.2.2020.12

11. Bartolomé A, Steffens K. Are moocs promising learning environments? Comunicar [Internet]. 2015 [citado 11/11/2023]; 22(44):91-9. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.3916/C44-2015-10

12. Sáiz MC, Casanova JR, Lencastre JA, Almeida L, Martín LJ. Student satisfaction with online teaching in times of COVID-19. Comunicar [Internet]. 2022 [citado 11/11/2023];30(70):31-40. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.3916/C70-2022-03

13. De la Fuente J, Zapata Sevillano L, Peralta FJ, López M. Personal self-regulation, academic achievement, and satisfaction of learning (product). Int J Dev Educ Psychol Rev INFAD Psicol [Internet]. 2016 [citado 11/11/2023];4(1):187-96. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2014.n1.v4.602

14. Castro P, Suárez X, Rivera P. Estrategias de autorregulación usadas por universitarios en entornos virtuales y satisfacción académica alcanzada en pandemia. Rev Educ Mendive [Internet]. 2021 [citado 11/11/2023];19(4):1127-1141. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/men/v19n4/1815-7696-men-19-04-1127.pdf14.

15. Villanueva I, Santos V, Rivera E, Vega E. Estrategias de autorregulación en contextos virtuales de aprendizaje durante el confinamiento social por la pandemia Covid-19. Rev Educ [Internet]. 2021 [citado 11/11/2023];7(23):253-69. Disponible en: http://fh.mdp.edu.ar/revistas/index.php/r_educ/article/view/5098/557815.