medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Archivos de Investigación Materno Infantil

ISSN 2007-3194 (Print)
Órgano de difusión oficial del Instituto Materno Infantil del Estado de México
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2025, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Arch Inv Mat Inf 2025; 16 (1)

The FullPIERS Scale as a predictor of adverse outcomes in patients with severe preeclampsia

Fernández PM, Sarmiento HAP, Briones GJC
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/121917

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/121917
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/121917

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 28-31
PDF size: 294.40 Kb.


Key words:

preeclampsia, hypertensive disorders, maternal mortality, FullPIERS.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: hypertensive disorders of pregnancy represent the most common complication during gestation, occurring in up to 15% of cases. They are considered one of the leading causes of maternal mortality, and in Latin America, preeclampsia is responsible for 25.7% of these deaths. The importance of timely diagnosis lies in the high rate of maternal and fetal complications. In this context, the FullPIERS model emerged as a scale to predict maternal complications within the first 48 hours of patient admission. Objective: to determine the usefulness of the FullPIERS scale in predicting adverse maternal outcomes in patients diagnosed with severe preeclampsia at the "Dr. Maximiliano Ruiz Castañeda" General Hospital. Material and methods: a descriptive relational analysis was conducted. The necessary information was identified in the records of patients who met the inclusion criteria. For qualitative variables, frequency and percentage calculations were performed, while for quantitative variables, measures of central tendency and dispersion were calculated. Probability measures included sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the scale, prevalence ratios and confidence intervals were used, with a statistical power of 95 and 5% margin of error, accepting a significant difference at p < 0.05. Results: sensitivity of 38.9% and a specificity of 98.8%. Additionally, the positive predictive value was 93.33%, and the negative predictive value was 78.64%. The area under the curve was 0.849 and an accuracy of 80.5%. Conclusions: the FullPIERS scale is useful for predicting adverse maternal outcomes in patients diagnosed with severe preeclampsia. A low result on the scale is related to low probability of developing adverse maternal outcomes with a high specificity (98.8%). The model found an accuracy 80.5% which indicates that it classifies correctly 4 out of 5 patients.


REFERENCES

  1. Prevención, diagnóstico y tratamiento de la preeclampsia en segundo y tercer nivel de atención, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social; Ciudad de México, 16/03/2017. Disponible en: https://www.imss.gob.mx/sites/all/statics/guiasclinicas/020GER.pdf

  2. Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, Tuncalp O, Moller AB, Daniels J et al. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014; 2 (6): e323-333.

  3. Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 222. Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 135 (6): e237-e260.

  4. Sahe AL, Sahe NL. Estados hipertensivos y embarazo. Córdoba, Argentina: FASGO; 2017.

  5. Cunningham G, MacDonald P, Gant N. Williams obstetricia. 20 edición. Argentina: Editorial Medica Panamericana, 1999, 241-299.

  6. Carrión-Nessi FS, Omaña-Ávila OD, Romero SR, Mendoza DL, Lahoud AC, Marchis MJ, et al. Síndromes hipertensivos del embarazo: pautas actualizadas para la conducta clínica. Rev Obstet Ginecol Venez. 2022; 82 (2): 242-263. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.51288/00820213

  7. Prevención, diagnóstico y manejo de la preeclampsia/eclampsia. Lineamiento técnico, abril 2017, Secretaría de Salud.

  8. Teela KC, Ferguson RM, Donnay FA, Darmstadt GL. The PIERS trial: Hope for averting deaths from pre-eclampsia. Lancet. 2011; 377 (9761): 185-186. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61463-8

  9. Sharma A, Suri J, Khanam Z, Pandey D, Bachani S, Sharma A. Prediction of complications of pre-eclampsia using the fullPIERS high risk predictive model. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023; 163 (3): 983-988.

  10. Von Dadelszen P, Payne B, Li J, Ansermino JM, Broughton PF, Coté AM et al. Prediction of adverse maternal outcomes in pre-eclampsia: development and validation of the fullPIERS model. Lancet. 2011; 377 (9761): 219-227. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61351-7

  11. Almeida ST, Katz L, Coutinho I, Amorim M. Validation of fullPIERS model for prediction of adverse outcomes among women with severe pre-eclampsia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017; 138 (2): 142-147. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12197




Figure 1
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Arch Inv Mat Inf. 2025;16