Torres IMC, Bernal FRF, Burciaga NJA, Gómez PGM, Cisneros PV

Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 24-30
PDF size: 1982.46 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: cleft lip and palate (CLP) is a common congenital anomaly. Patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (CUCLP) have deformities of the lip, palate, alveolus and nose. In order to improve postoperative aesthetic results, presurgical orthopedics is used with different techniques such as the SAC-PP-MR system, with its palatal plate and adjustable nasal shaper. There is controversy about the benefits of presurgical orthopedics in patients with CLP. Objective: to evaluate the aesthetic results of the SAC-PP-MR system in patients with CLP and to compare the postoperative results. Material and methods: non-randomized clinical-surgical trial. 18 patients with CLP were selected in two groups: a group with and without presurgical orthopedics. Results: at the end of the presurgical orthopedics we obtained changes in the alveolar gap, the cleft fossa and the labial cleft, however, when comparing the post-surgical results of both groups there were no aesthetic differences. Conclusions: there are no differences in the post-surgical aesthetic results between both groups, however, there are significant changes with a high effect in the use of presurgical orthopedics in the reduction of the alveolar gap, which decreases the rate of nasoalveolar fistula and possibly improves the results in the nasoalveolar graft.

REFERENCES

1. Volk AS, Davis MJ, Desai P, Hollier LH. The history and mission of smile train, a global cleft charity. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin N Am. 2020; 32 (3): 481-488. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2020.04.010.

2. Dirección de vigilancia epidemiológica de enfermedades no transmisibles. Informe Trimestral Sistema de Vigilancia Epidemiológica de Defectos al Nacimiento. Secretaria de Salud. Disponible en: https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/934838/InformeTrimestralSVEDAN_2T_Corteal01julio2024.pdf

3. Valcarcel-Llerandi J, Morales-Peralta E, Fernández-González MC, Pérez-Borrego A. Environmental factors associated with cleft lip and palate in children treated at the William Soler Hospital. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología. 2024; 4: 772. Disponible en: https://sct.ageditor.ar/index.php/sct/article/view/852

4. Torres-Ibarra MC, Burciaga-Nava JA, Gómez-Palacio-Gastélum M, Cisneros-Pérez V, Bernal-Faro RF. Características sociodemográficas en pacientes con labio y paladar hendido; asociación Tseinan en Chiapas, México. Rev AMOP. 2024; 36: 44-48. doi: 10.62640/Op362422.

5. Vázquez-Partida G. Manejo estomatológico de paciente con labio y paladar hendido unilateral. Tesis. León, Guanajuato: UNAM, Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores Unidad León. Available in: https://ru.dgb.unam.mx/bitstream/20.500.14330/TES01000847492/3/0847492.pdf

6. Durón RD, Granados MA, Canseco LJ, Cuairán RV, Canseco JJF. Ortopedia prequirúrgica en pacientes de labio y paladar hendido unilateral: presentación de casos clínicos. Rev Mex Ortodon. 2017; 5 (2): 89-99.

7. Grayson BH, Maull D. Nasoalveolar molding for infants born with cleft of the lip, alveolus, and palate. Clin Plastic Surg. 2004; 31 (2): 149-158. doi: 10.1016/S0094-1298(03)00140-8.

8. Bennun D. The real origin of presurgical nasal molding for cleft nose deformity and its posterior evolution. J Craniofac Surg. 2017; 28 (2): 305-307. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003534.

9. Elizondo R, Lagravere MO, Flores E, Letechipía N. Presurgical preparation of infants with unilateral cleft lip and palate: the SAC-PP-MR innovative technique. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018; 56 (3): 408-414. doi: 10.1177/1055665618780980.

10. Rosselle PP. The surgical nasoalveolar molding: a rational treatment for unilateral cleft lip nose deformity and literature review. PRS Global Open. 2020; 8 (8): e3044. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003044.

11. Zhang X, Arneja JS. Evidence-based medicine: the bilateral cleft lip repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 140 (1): 152-165. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003474.

12. Kapadia H, Olson D, Tse R, Susarla SM. Nasoalveolar molding for unilateral and bilateral cleft lip repair. Oral Maxillof Surg Clin N Am. 2020; 32 (2): 197-204. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2020.01.008.

13. Rosselle PP, Olivencia-Flores C, Delgado-Jiménez MP, Ormeño-Aquino R. Surgical nasoalveolar molding: a rational treatment for bilateral cleft lip nose and systematic review. PRS Global Open. 2020; 8 (9): e3082. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003082.

14. Tseinan. Tseinan. Available in: https://tseinan.org/

15. Kurnik NM, Calis M, Sobol DL, Kapadia H, Mercan E, Tse RW. A comparative assessment of nasal appearance following nasoalveolar molding and primary surgical repair for treatment of unilateral cleft lip and palate. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021; 148 (5): 1075-1084. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008462.

16. Iraurgi I. Evaluación de resultados clínicos (II): las medidas de la significación clínica o los tamaños del efecto. Norte de Salud Mental. 2009; 8 (34): 94-110. Disponible en: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4830218

17. Santiago PE, Grayson BH. Role of the craniofacial orthodontist on the craniofacial and cleft lip and palate team. Semin Orthod. 2009; 15 (4): 225-243. doi: 10.1053/j.sodo.2009.07.004.

18. Hitesh K, Douglas O, Raymond T, Srinivas MS. Nasoalveolar molding for unilateral and bilateral cleft lip repair. Oral Maxillofacial Surg Clin N. 2020; 32 (2): 197-204. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2020.01.008.