medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Acta Ortopédica Mexicana

ISSN 2992-8036 (Electronic)
ISSN 2306-4102 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2026, Number 2

<< Back

Acta Ortop Mex 2026; 40 (2)

Revision of distal biceps tendon rupture secondary to malpositioning. Case report

Pérez-Arce R, Fraind-Maya G, Martínez DD, García-Linage R, Zimbrón-López D, Velázquez-Castañeda R, Lassard-Rosenthal J
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/123059

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/123059
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/123059

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 128-132
PDF size: 1207.12 Kb.


Key words:

distal biceps tendon, malpositioning, posterior interosseous nerve, revision surgery, anatomical reinsertion.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: distal biceps tendon rupture is an uncommon injury, with an incidence of two to three cases per 100,000 people annually. It predominantly affects men between the ages of 40 and 60, commonly in the dominant arm and during eccentric contractions. Surgical treatment is preferred as it allows better restoration of supination and flexion strength. Proper anatomical positioning has been shown to optimize forearm supination strength. Clinical case: a 45-year-old male developed an injury to the posterior interosseous nerve secondary to improper positioning of the distal biceps tendon during reinsertion. A revision surgery was performed. Conclusion: this case provides clinical evidence of a specific complication rarely described: posterior interosseous nerve entrapment due to incorrect tendon reinsertion. The value of proper anatomical positioning to avoid neurological sequelae is emphasized, as well as the importance of timely surgical reintervention to restore function.


REFERENCES

  1. Dunphy TR, Hudson J, Batech M, Acevedo DC, Mirzayan R. Surgical treatment of distal biceps tendon ruptures: an analysis of complications in 784 surgical repairs. Am J Sports Med. 2017; 45(13): 3020-9.

  2. Razaeian S, Zhang D, Harb A, Meller R, Krettek C, Hawi N. Distal biceps tendon repair using a modified double-incision technique: patient-reported outcomes with 10-year follow-up. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020; 8(8): 2325967120944812.

  3. Amarasooriya M, Bain GI, Roper T, Bryant K, Iqbal K, Phadnis J. Complications after distal biceps tendon repair: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med. 2020; 48(12): 3103-11.

  4. Watson JN, Moretti VM, Schwindel L, Hutchinson MR. Repair techniques for acute distal biceps tendon ruptures: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014; 96(24): 2086-90.

  5. Safran MR, Graham SM. Distal biceps tendon ruptures: incidence, demographics, and the effect of smoking. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002; (404): 275-83.

  6. Dobbie RP. Avulsion of the lower biceps brachii tendon: analysis of fifty-one previously unreported cases. Am J Surg. 1941; 51(3): 662-83.

  7. Boyd HB, Anderson LD. A method for reinsertion of the distal biceps brachii tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1961; 43(7): 1041-3.

  8. Schmidt CC, Diaz VA, Weir DM, Latona CR, Miller MC. Repaired distal biceps magnetic resonance imaging anatomy compared with outcome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012; 21(12): 1623-31.

  9. Schmidt CC, Brown BT, Qvick LM, Stacowicz RZ, Latona CR, Miller MC. Factors that determine supination strength following distal biceps repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016; 98(14): 1153-60.

  10. Matzon JL, Graham JG, Penna S, Ciccotti MG, Abboud JA, Lutsky KF, et al. A prospective evaluation of early postoperative complications after distal biceps tendon repairs. J Hand Surg Am. 2019; 44(5): 382-6.

  11. Morrey BF, Askew LJ, An KN, Dobyns JH. Rupture of the distal tendon of the biceps brachii: a biomechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985; 67: 418-21.

  12. Ford SE, Andersen JS, Macknet DM, Connor PM, Loeffler BJ, Gaston RG. Major complications after distal biceps tendon repairs: retrospective cohort analysis of 970 cases. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018; 27(10): 1898-906.

  13. Cain RA, Nydick JA, Stein MI, Willians BD, Polikandriotis JA, Hess AV. Complications following distal biceps repair. J Hand Surg Am. 2012; 37(10): 2112-7.

  14. Forthman CL, Zimmerman RM, Sullivan MJ, Gabel GT. Cross-sectional anatomy of the bicipital tuberosity and biceps brachii ten- don insertion: relevance to anatomic tendon repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008; 17: 522-6.

  15. Hansen G, Smith A, Pollock JW, Werier J, Nairn R, Rakhra KS, et al. Anatomic repair of the distal biceps tendon cannot be consistently performed through a classic single-incision suture anchor technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014; 23(12): 1898-904.

  16. Li J, Seiler LM, Hoekzema NA, Johnson TR, Lee J, Ridenauer JL, et al. Distal biceps reconstruction: a long-term follow-up of the complications and durability of the single-incision power optimizing cost-effective (SPOC) repair. JSES Int. 2023; 7(6): 2547-52.

  17. Tanner C, Johnson T, Muradov P, Husak L. Single incision power optimizing cost-effective (SPOC) distal biceps repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013; 22: 30




Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Acta Ortop Mex. 2026 Mar-Abr;40