medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirujano General

ISSN 2594-1518 (Electronic)
ISSN 1405-0099 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2026, Number 1

<< Back

Cir Gen 2026; 48 (1)

Anthropology in contemporary surgery practice: toward a model of integrative biocultural surgery

Springall FJ, Escamilla OAC, Serrano PJ, Guevara SS
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/123070

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/123070
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/123070

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 47-51
PDF size: 299.37 Kb.


Key words:

general surgery, medical anthropology, physician-patient relations, culture, bioethics, integrative biocultural surgery.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: general surgery, traditionally focused on technical and biological rigor, faces the challenge of treating patients in increasingly diverse cultural contexts. The surgical act is not merely a physical intervention but a biocultural event that impacts the patient's identity and psyche. Objective: to analyze the contribution of medical anthropology to contemporary surgical practice and to propose the "integrative biocultural surgery" model. Material and methods: a narrative review and conceptual analysis of indexed scientific literature were conducted, integrating ethnographic, ethical, and clinical perspectives. Results: key findings indicate that understanding the operating room as a ritual space, addressing the cultural perception of pain, and adapting informed consent to multicultural contexts improve the doctor-patient relationship. Anthropology allows the surgeon to identify symbolic barriers that affect adherence and postoperative recovery. Conclusion: integrating anthropology into surgery optimizes both clinical and ethical outcomes. The surgery of the future must be technically precise yet anthropologically conscious to ensure truly comprehensive care.


REFERENCES

  1. Ocampo Martínez J. La antropología médica como antropología filosófica. Rev Mex Angiol. 2013; 41: 44-47.

  2. Silva Pereira L. Antropología de la enfermedad: teoría, practica y aportes para el debate antropológico. En: II Congreso Chileno de Antropología. Valdivia: Colegio de Antropólogos de Chile A. G; 1995. pp. 371-380.

  3. Jones LK, Jennings BM, Higgins MK, de Waal FBM. Ethological observations of social behavior in the operating room. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018; 115: 7575-7580.

  4. Tassone SA. Altars and icons: the surgical suite as a sacred ritual. Explore (NY). 2012; 8: 299-303.

  5. Hall DE. Altar and table: a phenomenology of the surgeon-priest. Yale J Biol Med. 2008; 81: 193-198.

  6. Cochran A, Braga R, editors. Introduction to the operating room. In: The operating room as a study in cultural anthropology. McGraw-Hill Education; 2016.

  7. Herrera D, Troya C. Antropología para médicos. PFR. 2019; 4: 1-6.

  8. Querts Méndez O, Orozco Hechavarría O, Montoya Rivera J, Beltrán Moret M, Caballero Herrera MY. Consideraciones antropológicas en el proceso de formación profesional del médico general. MEDISAN. 2013; 17: 7021-730.

  9. Katz P. Ritual in the operating room. Ethnology. 1981; 20: 335-350.

  10. Díaz Bernal Z, Aguilar Guerra T, Linares Martín X. La antropología médica aplicada a la salud pública. Rev Cubana Salud Pública. 2015; 41: 655-665.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Gen. 2026;48