medigraphic.com
ISSN 0001-0944 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de la Asociación Dental Mexicana

2026, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev ADM 2026; 83 (3)

Bonding system protocols. Scientific fundamentals.

Miguelena MKE, Garcilazo GA, López GL

Language: Spanish
References: 50
Page: 153-159
PDF size: 677.80 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: the success of adhesive treatments in dentistry depends on strict adherence to established protocols such as humidity control, precise timing, and compliance with the conditioning, application, and photopolymerization phases. Objective: to explore the importance and relevance of each step in the enamel and dentin bonding protocols, highlighting the most effective methods and recent advancements, discussing the scientific evidence supporting each step, and providing practical recommendations to optimize clinical outcomes. Material and methods: a descriptive literature review was conducted, with searches performed in various databases, electronic libraries, and search engines, seeking scientific support for three-step etch-and-rinse adhesives to facilitate the understanding of self-etching and universal protocols. Conclusion: it is important for professionals to not only know the precise way to perform the steps that make up the appropriate bonding protocol for each system and substrate but also the scientific evidence behind them to make the procedure efficient and predictable.


REFERENCES

  1. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Van Landuyt K, Yoshida Y, Peumans M. From Buonocore's pioneering acid-etch technique to self-adhering restoratives. A status perspective of rapidly advancing dental adhesive technology. J Adhes Dent. 2020; 22 (1): 7-34.

  2. Hilgert LA, Lopes GC, Araujo E, Baratieri LN. CE 2 adhesive procedures in daily practice: essential aspects. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2008; 29 (4): 208-215.

  3. Rodrigues L dos S, Mello PS, Almeida TJ da S, Freitas MIM, Fraga MAA, Finck NS. Survey on protocols focused on adhesion procedures adopted by dentists. Rev Eletronica Acervo Saúde. 2023; 23 (9): e13784. doi: 10.25248/reas.e13784.2023.

  4. Titova O, Melenberg T, Linnik L, Boeva T, Burov A, Daironas S et al. Adhesive systems in the practice of a dentist doctor. Actual Probl Dent. 2020; 16 (1): 178-181. doi: 10.18481/2077-7566-20-16-1-178-181.

  5. Meharry MR, Moazzami SM, Li Y. Comparison of enamel and dentin shear bond strengths of current dental bonding adhesives from three bond generations. Oper Dent. 2013; 38 (6): E237-E245. doi: 10.2341/12-521-l

  6. Kaneshima T, Yatani H, Kasai T, Watanabe EK, Yamashita A. The influence of blood contamination on bond strengths between dentin and an adhesive resin cement. Oper Dent. 2000; 25 (3): 195-201.

  7. Chung CWM, Yiu CKY, King NM, Hiraishi N, Tay FR. Effect of saliva contamination on bond strength of resin luting cements to dentin. J Dent. 2009; 37 (12): 923-931. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.07.007.

  8. Aboush YE, Tareen A, Elderton RJ. Resin-to-enamel bonds: effect of cleaning the enamel surface with prophylaxis pastes containing fluoride or oil. Br Dent J. 1991; 171 (7): 207-209. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4807651.

  9. Muñoz-Estrella M, Universidad Central del Ecuador, Cruz-Gallegos A, Armas-Vega A del C, Universidad Tecnológica Equinoccial. Ecuador, Universidad Central del Ecuador. Influencia del método de limpieza empleado previo el empleo de materiales ionomericos en micro filtración de cavidades a nivel cervical. Kiru. 2019; 16 (3): 118-122. doi: 10.24265/kiru.2019.v16n3.04.

  10. Sol-Segarra E, Espasa-Suárez de Deza E, Boj-Quesada JR. Influencia de diferentes sistemas de profilaxis en la adhesión de un sellador de fisuras al esmalte. RCOE. 2005; 10 (2): 177-182. Disponible en: https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1138-123X2005000200004

  11. Herrera E. Fracasos en la adhesión. Av Odontoestomatol. 2005; 21 (2): 63-69. Disponible en: https://scielo.isciii.es/pdf/odonto/v21n2/original1.pdf

  12. Sinjari B, Santilli M, D'Addazio G, Rexhepi I, Gigante A, Caputi S et al. Influence of dentine pre-treatment by sandblasting with aluminum oxide in adhesive restorations. An in vitro study. Materials (Basel). 2020; 13 (13): 3026. doi: 10.3390/ma13133026.

  13. Santos M, Bapoo H, Rizkalla AS, Santos GC Jr. Effect of dentin-cleaning techniques on the shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin luting cement to dentin. Oper Dent. 2011; 36 (5): 512-520. doi: 10.2341/10-392-l.

  14. Zimmer R, Mantelli AR, Montagna K, Reston EG, Arossi GA. Does sandblasting improve bond strength in resin composite repair? Dentistry Rev. 2024; 4 (1): 100077. doi: 10.1016/j.dentre.2023.100077.

  15. Lukomska-Szymanska M, Sokolowski J, Lapinska B. Chlorhexidine – mechanism of action and its application to dentistry. J Stomatol. 2017; 70 (4): 405-417. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0010.5698.

  16. Matar L, Dowidar K, Talat D, Kholeif D, Abdelrahman H. Effectiveness of chlorhexidine as a cavity disinfectant in atraumatic restorative treatment in primary teeth (randomized controlled clinical trial). Alex Dent J. 2021; 0 (0): 0-0. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.32224.1074.

  17. Aykut-Yetkiner A, Candan U, Ersin N, Eronat C, Belli S, Ozcan M. Effect of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate cavity disinfectant on microtensile bond strength of tooth-coloured restorative materials to sound and caries-affected dentin. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2015; 29 (12): 1169-1177. doi: 10.1080/01694243.2015.1004507.

  18. Miguelena K, Garcilazo A, Bonilla R, Lobato M. Manual de Cementado. México: Editorial CBS UAM; 2021.

  19. Lopes GC, Thys DG, Klaus P, Oliveira GM, Widmer N. Enamel acid etching: a review. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2007; 28 (1): 18-24.

  20. Su-Mi Choi, Young-Chul Choi, Jae-Hong Park, Sung-Chul Choi. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent. 2008; 35 (3): 437-445.

  21. Nakabayashi N, Takeyama M, Kojima K, Mogi M, Miura F, Masuhara E. Studies on dental self-curing resins (22) - adhesion of 4-META/MMA-TBB resin to enamel (author's transl). Shika Rikogaku Zasshi. 1982; 23 (61): 88-92.

  22. Gunadi G, Nakabayashi N. Preparation of an effective light-cured bonding agent for orthodontic application. Dent Mater. 1997; 13 (1): 7-12.

  23. Nakabayashi N Pashley DH. Hybridization of dental hard tissues. Tokyo: Quintessence; 1998.

  24. Van Meerbeek B, Vargas M, Onoue S, Yoshida Y, Peumans M, Lambrechts P et al. Adhesives and cements to promote preservation desntristry. Oper Dent. 2001; 26 (Suppl. 6): 119-144.

  25. Heredia E. Grado de microfiltración técnica de grabado: ácido convencional y autolimitante. U.C.E. 2017; 1: 1-78. Disponible en: http://www.dspace.uce.edu.ec/bitstream/25000/9441/1/T-UCE-0015-558.pdf

  26. Machi R. Materiales dentales. 4ta edicion. Buenos Aires: Médica Panamericana; 2007.

  27. Pashley DH. Dentin bonding: overview of the substrate with respect to adhesive material. J Esthet Dent. 1991; 3 (2): 46-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.1991.tb00808.x.

  28. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Water treeing—A potential mechanism for degradation of dentin adhesives. Am J Dent. 2003; 16 (1): 6-12.

  29. Pashley DH, Tay FR, Yiu C, Hashimoto M, Breschi L, Carvalho RM, Ito S. Collagen degradation by host-derived enzymes during aging. J Dent Res. 2004; 83 (3): 216-221.

  30. Kijsamanmith K, Srisatayasatien P, Thanindratarn N, Vichainarong C, Panyasukum J. The effect of 2% chlorhexidine iontophoresis on dentin sealing ability of etch-and-rinse adhesive: an in vitro study. J Dent Sci. 2024; 19 (2): 846-854. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2023.09.004.

  31. Carrilho MR, Carvalho RM, Sousa EN, Nicolau J, Breschi L, Mazzoni A et al. Substantivity of chlorhexidine to human dentin. Dent Mater. 2010; 26 (8): 779-785. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.04.002.

  32. Mandri MN, Aguirre-Grabre de Prieto A, Zamudio ME. Sistemas adhesivos en Odontología restauradora. Odontoestomatologia. 2015; 17 (26): 50-56. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.edu.uy/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1688-93392015000200006&lng=es

  33. Miyazaki M, Platt JA, Onose H, Moore BK. Influence of dentin primer application methods on dentin bond strength. Oper Dent. 1996; 21 (4): 167-172.

  34. Luque-Martinez IV, Perdigao J, Muñoz MA, Sezinando A, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Effects of solvent evaporation time on immediate adhesive properties of universal adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater. 2014; 30 (10): 1126-1135. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.07.002.

  35. Awad MM, Alrahlah A, Matinlinna JP, Hamama HH. Effect of adhesive air-drying time on bond strength to dentin: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2019; 90: 154-162. doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.02.006.

  36. Garcilazo-Gómez A, Miguelena-Muro K, Guerrero-Ibarra J, Rios-Szalay E, Bonilla-Haro R. Factores que afectan y mejoran la adhesión en dentina. Revista ADM. 2019; 76 (3): 162-168.

  37. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R et al. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength — Evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test. Dent Mater. 1994; 10 (4): 236-240. doi: 10.1016/0109-5641(94)90067-1.

  38. Chen JH, Liu Y, Niu LN, Lu S, Tay FR, Gao Y. A feasible method to eliminate nanoleakage in dentin hybrid layers. J Adhes Dent. 2014; 16 (5): 429-434.

  39. Ye Q, Wang Y, Williams K, Spencer P. Characterization of photopolymerization of dentin adhesives as a function of light source and irradiance. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2007; 80 (2): 440-446. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.30615.

  40. Besse V, Derbanne MA, Pham TN, Cook WD, Le Pluart L. Photopolymerization study and adhesive properties of self-etch adhesives containing bis(acyl)phosphine oxide initiator. Dent Mater. 2016; 32 (4): 561-569. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.01.005.

  41. Muro KEM, Ibarra JG, Gómez AG, Szalay ER. Análisis de resistencia al desplazamiento de dos cementos de resina, en dentina intrarradicular. Rev Odontol Mex. 2016; 20 (4): 238-242.

  42. Yoshida Y, Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Hayakawa S, Torii Y, Ogawa T et al. Self-assembled nano-layering at the adhesive interface. J Dent Res. 2012; 91 (4): 376-381. doi: 10.1177/0022034512437375.

  43. Carrilho E, Cardoso M, Marques-Ferreira M, Marto CM, Paula A, Coelho AS. 10-MDP based dental adhesives: adhesive interface characterization and adhesive stability—A systematic review. Materials (Basel). 2019; 12 (5): 790. doi: 10.3390/ma12050790.

  44. Carvalho PCK, Almeida CCMS, Souza ROA, Tango RN. The effect of a 10-MDP-based dentin adhesive as alternative for bonding to implant abutment materials. Materials (Basel). 2022; 15 (15): 5449. doi: 10.3390/ma15155449.

  45. Wang L, Agulhari MAS, Froio NL, Campos MMB, Mosquim V, Brianezzi LF de F et al. 10-MDP-based dentin bonding systems: why is chlorhexidine not worth to be used adjunctively? J Adhes Sci Technol. 2023; 37 (24): 3569-3581. doi: 10.1080/01694243.2023.2211790.

  46. Perdigao J. Current perspectives on dental adhesion: (1) dentin adhesion – not there yet. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2020; 56 (1): 190-207. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2020.08.004.

  47. Vinagre A, Ramos J. Adhesion in restorative dentistry. En: Adhesives - Applications and Properties. InTech; 2016.

  48. Khaskhanova LM, Razumova SN, Gapochkina LL, Razumov NM, Serebrov DV, Vetchinkin AV et al. Comparative characteristics of the strength of adhesive systems of the fifth generation in the modification of the adhesive protocol. Medicinskij alfavit. 2022; (2): 63-66. doi: 10.33667/2078-5631-2022-2-63-66.

  49. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Adhesive systems: effect on bond strength of incorrect use. J Adhes Dent. 2002; 4 (3): 233-242.

  50. Perdigao J. New developments in dental adhesion. Dent Clin North Am. 2007; 51 (2): 333-357. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2007.01.001.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com