medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirugía Cardiaca en México

ISSN 2448-5640 (Print)
Diario Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Cirugía Cardiaca, A.C., y del Colegio Mexicano de Cirugía Cardiovascular y Torácica, A.C.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2026, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Cir Card Mex 2026; 11 (3)

Video-assisted approach to thoracic cysts (pericardial cyst)

Jiménez-González, Reynaldo J1; Ogaz-Escarpita, María C1; Castañón-Colunga, Edwin A1; Carrera-Baca, Mauricio1; Guillén-Ramírez, Raúl M2; Marmolejo-Rivera, Rigoberto1; García-Villarreal, Ovidio A3
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/123486

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/123486
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/123486

Language: English
References: 16
Page: 114-117
PDF size: 1764.46 Kb.


Key words:

pericardial cyst, mediastinal masses, videoassisted thoracotomy, incidental finding.

ABSTRACT

Pericardial cysts are rare, benign, and asymptomatic mediastinal masses. Most are found in the right cardiophrenic angle, they occur due to embryonic malformations and are found incidentally during complementary studies. Management may be conservative or surgical and is individualized according to the clinical presentation. We describe the case of a patient with a pericardial cyst in an unusual location, left cardiophrenic angle.



ABBREVIATIONS:

  • CT = computed tomography
  • VATS = video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Pericardial cysts comprise a relatively rare subset of thoracic tumors, accounting for approximately 5 to 10% of cases.1,2 They rank as the third most common mediastinal mass, following thymomas and thymic carcinomas.2,3 The estimated incidence of pericardial cysts is roughly 1 in 100,000 individuals.4 These cysts typically present with diameters of less than 3 cm, although their size can vary considerably, ranging from 2 to 28 cm, with those exceeding 8 to 9 cm in diameter being classified as giant cysts.5

The majority of pericardial cysts are congenital in origin, resulting from embryological malformations due to defects in the development of the coelomic cavity, which occur when the pericardium becomes entrapped during embryonic development.6 However, acquired cases can also arise following thoracic surgery, chest trauma, or pericarditis.7,8 Typically, these cysts are asymptomatic, although they may present with symptoms such as dyspnea, chest pain, and persistent cough. Furthermore, compression of adjacent structures can lead to complications like superior vena cava syndrome. Diagnosis is often incidental, with chest X-rays revealing a round radiopaque mass.9,10 Characteristic imaging features include a single, thin-walled, round, well-defined lesion with clear fluid content and no contrast enhancement.5,11 The right costophrenic angle is the most common site of presentation, often associated with dextrocardia when located in this region.12 Although rare, potential complications include cardiac tamponade, a severe and potentially life-threatening outcome.13 We present a case of a patient with a pericardial cyst located in the left costophrenic angle, an uncommon site.



CASE DESCRIPTION

A 77-year-old woman with a longstanding history of systemic hypertension spanning over two decades, treated with atenolol and chlorthalidone 50/12.5 mg, presented with nonspecific chest pain and exertional dyspnea, which significantly impaired her functional capacity. A chest radiograph revealed a round radiopaque mass in the left costophrenic angle, prompting further evaluation with a plain and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest (Figura 1).

The CT scan demonstrated an extrapulmonary intrathoracic cystic lesion in the left costophrenic angle, measuring approximately 290 ml in volume. Based on the imaging findings, a differential diagnosis of pericardial mesothelial cyst versus pleural cyst of unknown etiology was considered. Following consultation with the cardiothoracic surgery department, a diagnostic and therapeutic video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) was planned (Figura 2).

The procedure involved thoracoscopy via the sixth left intercostal space, followed by single-port thoracoscopic resection of the pericardial cyst. Intraoperatively, an extrapulmonary cystic lesion dependent on the parietal pericardium with a highly vascularized capsule was observed. Two feeding vessels, located anteriorly and posteriorly, were identified, ligated, and surgically excised. Subsequent puncture of the cyst evacuated approximately 290 ml of citrine fluid, which was sent for cytological and cytochemical analysis. The cyst capsule was then excised and submitted for histopathological examination. The cytochemical analysis revealed a transparent, straw-yellow fluid with a pH of 8.00, protein content of 2 g/dl, glucose level of 20 mg/dl, and absence of blood cells or microorganisms. The culture remained negative after 48 hours of incubation. The patient recovered uneventfully and was discharged after a fourth-day hospital stay (Figura 3). Histopathological examination of the cyst capsule confirmed the diagnosis of a giant pericardial cyst.



COMMENT

The diagnosis of pericardial cysts is typically incidental, often detected on chest radiography, but computed tomography and cardiothoracic magnetic resonance imaging are the modalities of choice for accurately determining the size, location, and characteristics of the lesion.14

Transesophageal echocardiography is employed to assess the hemodynamic impact on right ventricular ejection flow and to evaluate potential constrictive pathophysiology affecting both ventricular chambers.11,15 With the advent of minimally invasive surgical techniques, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has become an invaluable tool not only for diagnostic confirmation but also for therapeutic intervention.

The management of pericardial cysts spans a spectrum from conservative approaches, characterized by serial imaging surveillance in asymptomatic cases, to invasive procedures, including percutaneous aspiration and surgical excision, which are typically reserved for symptomatic cases or those associated with complications. In the present case, surgical removal via a minimally invasive approach was chosen for due to the cyst's size and symptomatic nature.14,15

The decision-making process for managing pericardial cysts hinges on several factors, including the presence or absence of symptoms secondary to compression of adjacent structures, the size of the mass, the patient's hemodynamic status, and the behavior of the mediastinal lesion.15 According to the European Society of Cardiology guidelines, initial treatment with percutaneous aspiration and ethanol sclerotherapy is recommended for single, small cysts or in cases where surgical risk is high, while surgical resection via VATS or thoracotomy is advocated for large, symptomatic cysts as a second-line therapy.9,16 Notably, minimally invasive approaches offer several advantages, including reduced perioperative and postoperative complications, shorter hospital stays, and a lower risk of infection.16



CONCLUSIONS

Pericardial cysts often present with nonspecific symptoms, necessitating a thorough and meticulous evaluation to prevent diagnostic delays and ensure timely intervention. The vague chest symptoms exhibited by the patient in this case underscore the importance of considering a broad differential diagnosis when assessing chest syndromes.

Management must be tailored to the individual, as large cysts, such as the one presented, can cause compressive symptoms in adjacent structures, potentially leading to severe complications if left untreated. Currently, percutaneous aspiration and cyst resection via video-assisted thoracoscopy are the recommended treatment modalities, offering a effective and minimally invasive approach to managing these lesions.


REFERENCES

  1. Hynes JK, Tajik AJ, Osborn MJ, Orszulak TA, Seward JB. Two-dimensional echocardiographic diagnosis of pericardial cyst. Mayo Clin Proc. 1983;58(1):60-63.

  2. Adib-Hajbagheri P, Mirmohammadsadeghi M, Paknahad M, Rafiyan M. Pericardial cyst unveiling: a case of unusual chest symptoms in a young woman with a family history of cancer: a case report and review of literature. J Med Case Reports. 2024;18(1):459. doi: 10.1186/s13256-024-04771-1.

  3. Keita IK, Nazario Dolz AM, Falcón VGC, Castillo TL, Rodríguez FZ, Romero GLI. Consideraciones en torno a los tumores del mediastino. Rev Colomb Cir. 2020;35(3):472-482. doi: 10.30944/20117582.460.

  4. Rahman SMT, Rhaman MM, Hoque MA, Proma SB. Unusual cause of mediastinal tumor: a case of calcified pericardial cyst. Rare Tumors. 2023;15:20363613231177539. doi: 10.1177/20363613231177539.

  5. Grigoras A, Amalinei C, Caruntu ID, Grigoras CC, Chiselita IR, Crisan-Dabija RA. Symptomatic pericardial cysts and dilemmas in their diagnosis. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2023;64(4):517-525. doi: 10.47162/RJME.64.4.08.

  6. Koo CW, Newburg A. Congenital absence of the right pericardium: embryology and imaging. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2015;5:12. doi: 10.4103/2156-7514.152338.

  7. Carmona-Ruiz HA, Orihuela-Rodríguez Ó, Morales-Gudiño I. Asymptomatic giant pericardial cyst. Cir Cir. 2021;89(S2):68-71. doi: 10.24875/CIRU.21000280.

  8. Jiménez MC, España BE, Sanz MAI, Robles VP, Olmedilla AP, Campuzano RR. Resolución completa de quiste pericárdico atípico tras pleuropericarditis aguda. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2021;74(12):1111-1113. doi: 10.1016/j.recesp.2021.05.001.

  9. Kar SK, Ganguly T. Current concepts of diagnosis and management of pericardial cysts. Indian Heart J. 2017;69(3):364-370. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2017.02.021.

  10. Tyebally S, Chen D, Bhattacharyya S, Mughrabi A, Hussain Z, Manisty C, et al. Cardiac tumors: JACC CardioOncology State-of-the-art review. JACC CardioOncol. 2020;2(2):293-311. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2020.05.009.

  11. Elhakim A, Boguschewski A, Zamzow P, Saad M. A haemorrhagic pericardial cyst compressing the right side of the heart: a case report. Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2023;7(10):ytad497. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytad497.

  12. Jiménez-Serrano JA, Jiménez-González A, Esparza-Pantoja J, López-Viramontes B. Quiste pericárdico gigante: reporte de un caso. Lux Médica. 2016;11(34):35-39. doi: 10.33064/34lm2016713.

  13. Álvarez CM, Cantarini MB, Lombardi M, Martínez L, Pagés M, Orquera D, et al. Taponamiento cardíaco como complicación de ruptura intrapericárdica de quiste celómico. CONAREC. 2016;31(137):282-284.

  14. Wang ZJ, Reddy GP, Gotway MB, Yeh BM, Hetts SW, Higgins CB. CT and MR imaging of pericardial disease. RadioGraphics. 2003;23(Suppl_1):S167-S180. doi: 10.1148/rg.23si035504.

  15. Lennon Collins K, Zakharious F, Mandal AKJ, Missouris CG. Pericardial cyst: never too late to diagnose. J Clin Med. 2018;7(11):399. doi: 10.3390/jcm7110399.

  16. Zhang WM, Maimaitiaili A, Aizezi R, Abulimiti K, Yan F, Huo Q. Surgical management of pericardial cysts: a single-center retrospective study. Cureus. 2023;15(11):e49298. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49298.



AFFILIATIONS

1 Department of Cardiac Surgery,

2 Department of Cardiovascular Anesthesia. Hospital Ángeles Chihuahua. Chihuahua, México.

3 Colegio Mexicano de Cirugía Cardiovascular y Torácica. Ciudad de México, México.



Funding: none.

Disclosure: the authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.



CORRESPONDENCE

Dr. Reynaldo J. Jiménez-Gonzalez. E-mail: jesusr72@hotmail.com




Received: 13-11-2025. Accepted: 20-11-2025.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
CC BY-NC-ND

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Card Mex. 2026;11