medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Médica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2007, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 2007; 45 (3)

Clinical Ethics Committees in Mexico: Their development in the Mexican Institute of Social Security

Valdez-Martínez E, Bedolla M
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 265-268
PDF size: 115.31 Kb.


Key words:

ethics, clinical, bioethics, ethics committees.

ABSTRACT

The Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS) considers the relevance of ethics in a similar context than other countries have developed. According to these considerations, IMSS implemented formally of system of local committees on clinical ethics (CLEC), not only to provide support when ethical dilemmas emerge, but to facilitate the development of an ethics culture among health professionals. The implementation of the CLEC network started in 2004, and since then, its number has increased across the country. Currently IMSS has 78 CLECs. Their number continues to grow due to the level of awareness about the importance of ethics for making medical decisions. In November 2006 the first CLEC national meeting was held and the need to redefine strategies to improve performance of CLECS emerged. This article reports the current situation of the CLECs in Mexico.


REFERENCES

  1. Rosner F. Hospital medical ethics committees: a review of their development. J Am Med Assoc 1985;253:2693-2697.

  2. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Accreditation manual for hospitals. Disponible en http://www.jointcommission.org; http://library.dyc.edu/subjectguides/hsa.pdf. Consultado el 2 de abril de 2007.

  3. Lebber. Ethical function in hospital ethics committees. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Ohmsha Press; 2000.

  4. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. El programa regional de bioética. Disponible en http://www.paho.org/spanish/D/ops98-02_ch03.pdf Consultado el 16 de mayo de 2007.

  5. Slowther A, Johnston C, Goodall J, Hope T. Development of clinical ethics committees. BMJ 2004;328:950-952.

  6. Trota AR, Espíndola M. Comités de ética de atención primaria. Atencion Primaria 2001;28:550-553.

  7. Robles PH. Evaluation of healthcare ethics committees: the experience of HCE in Spain. HEC Forum 1999;11:263-276.

  8. Comités de ética hospitalaria. Argentina. Disponible en Cuadernos de Bioética [versión digital], sección legislación. Disponible en http://cuadernos.bioetica.org/legislacion.htm Consultado el 16 de mayo de 2007.

  9. Consejo de Salubridad General de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. Programa Nacional de Certificación de Establecimientos de Atención Médica. Disponible en http://www.salud.gob.mx/unidades/csg/progr_cert2.htm Consultado el 2 de abril del 2007.

  10. Tulsky JA, Fox E. Evaluating ethics consultation: framing the questions. JCE 1996;7:109-115.

  11. Saunders J. Developing clinical ethics committees. Clinical Medicine 2004;4:232-234.

  12. Gillon R. Clinical ethics committees–pros and cons. J Med Ethics 1997;23:203-204.

  13. Bedolla M. Teaching ethics. Mexican Americans and self-determination. Formos J Med Humanit 2004; Spring: 3-13.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2007;45