2007, Number 2
<< Back Next >>
Rev Mex Cir Endoscop 2007; 8 (2)
One hundred assisted colorectal laparoscopic procedures. Experience at the Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición 'Salvador Zubirán'
González CQ, Moreno BJM, Jonguitud ML, Tapia CLH, Vergara FO, López RF, Ramos-Veana RE
Language: Spanish
References: 26
Page: 73-78
PDF size: 77.59 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Background: Some of the advantages of the laparoscopic approach have also been corroborated in the field of colorectal surgery, such as less postoperative pain, lower blood loss, shorter hospital stay, better cosmesis and soon return to normal activities. However some doubts still exist regarding appropriate patient selection, surgery indication and specially the cost-efficiency analysis.
Patients and methods: A prospective series of patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery was analyzed. The demographical and statistical data was analyzed. A definition of conversion was established.
Results: One hundred procedures were included in the analysis; the most frequent were sigmoidectomy, right hemicolectomy and total mesorectal excision. The most frequent indications were diverticular disease, colonic cancer and rectal cancer. The mean operative time was 156 min, mean blood loss was 160 ml, conversion rate was 7%. No patient developed recurrence of malignant disease, a mean of 15.7 nodes was resected in cancer procedures. The morbidity rate was 19% and the mortality rate was 1%.
Conclusions: There is sufficient evidence to support the use of laparoscopy in colorectal surgery if the surgeon has the required experience and training.
REFERENCES
Delgado GNF, Bolufer CJM, Grau CE et al. Early results of laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 1998; 90: 323-334.
Molenaar ChBH, Bijnen AB, de Ruiter P. Indications for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Results from the Medical Centre Alkmaar, The Netherlands. Surg Endosc 1998; 12: 42-45.
Berlehner E, Decker T, Anders S, Heukrodt B. Laparoscopic surgery of rectal carcinoma, Radical oncology and late results.
Monson JRT, Darzi A, Carey PD, Guillou PJ. Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy in an unselected group of patients. Lancet 1992; 340: 831-833.
Monson JRT, Hill ADK, Darzi A. Laparoscopic colonic surgery. Br J Surg 1995; 82: 150-157.
Tate JJT, Kwok S, Dawson JW, Lau WY, Li AKC. Prospective comparison of laparoscopic and conventional anterior resection. Br J Surg 1993; 80: 1396-1398.
Tucker JG, Ambroze WL, Orangio GR, Duncan TD, Mason EM, Lucas GW. Laparoscopically assisted bowel surgery, analysis of 114 cases. Surg Endosc 1995; 9: 297-300.
Van Ye TM, Cattey RP, Henry LG. Laparoscopically assisted colon resections compare favorably with open technique. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1994; 1: 25-31.
Wexner SD, Cohen SM, Johansen OB, Nogueras JJ, Hagelman DG. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective assessment and current perspective. Br J Surg 1993; 80: 1602-1605.
Köckerling F, Scheidbach H. Current status of laparoscopic colorectal surgery, Surg Endosc 2000; 14: 777-778.
Alves A, Panis Y, Slim K, Heyd BF, Kwiatkowski G. Mantion and the Association Française de Chirurgie, French multicentre prospective observational study of laparoscopic versus open colectomy for sigmoid diverticular disease. Br J Surg 2005; 92: 1520-1525.
Köhler L, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E, for the Scientific Committee of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) Diagnosis and treatment of diverticular disease. Surg Endosc 1999; 13: 430-436.
Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurá P, Piqué JM, Visa J. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomized trial. Lancet 2002; 359: 2224-2229.
Nelson H. Sargent and The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 2050-2059.
Hazebroek EJ and The Color Study Group, A randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open resection for colon cancer. Surg Endosc 2002; 16: 40-53.
Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AMH, Heath RM, Brown JM, for the MRC CLASICC trial group, Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 365: 1718-1726.
Yong L, Deane M, Monson JR, Darzi A. Systematic review of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal malignancy. Surg Endosc 2001; 15: 1431-1439.
Karanjia ND, Corder AP, Bearn P et al. Leakage from stapled low anastomosis after total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 1994; 81: 1224-1226.
Huscher G, Silecchia G, Croce E, Farello GA, Lezoche E, Morino M, Asola M, Feliciotti F, Rosato P, Tarantini M, Basso N. Laparoscopic colorectal resection. Surg Endosc 1996; 10: 875-879.
Senagore AJ, Delaney CP. A critical analysis of laparoscopic colectomy at a single institution: lessons learned after 1000 cases. The American Journal of Surgery 2006; 191: 377-380.
Purkayastha S, Constantinides VA, Tekkis PP, Thanos A, Aziz O, Tilney H, Darzi AW, Heriot AG. Laparoscopic vs open surgery for diverticular disease: A meta-analysis of nonrandomized studies. Dis Colon Rectum 2006; 49: 446-463.
Scheidbach H, Schneider C, Konradt J, Bärlehner E, Köhler L, Wittekind Ch, Köckerling F. Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection and anterior resection with curative intent for carcinoma of the rectum. Surg Endosc 2002; 16: 7-13.
Leung KL, Kwok SPY, Lau WY, Meng WCS, Chung CC, Lai PBS, Kwong KH. Laparoscopic-assisted abdominoperineal resection for low rectal adenocarcinoma, Surg Endosc 2000;14: 67-70.
Schwander O, Schiedeck TH, Killaitis C et al. A case-control study comparing laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectosigmoidal and rectal cancer.
Leung KL, Kwok SP, Meng WC et al. Laparoscopic-assisted abdominoperineal resection for low rectal adenocarcinoma. Surg Endosc 2000; 14: 67-70.
Lezoche E, Feiciotti F, Paganini AM, Guerrieri M et al. Results of laparoscopic versus open resections for non-early rectal cancer in patients with a minimum follow-up of four years. Hepatogastroenterology 2002; 49: 1185-1190.