medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Acta Ortopédica Mexicana

ISSN 2992-8036 (Electronic)
ISSN 2306-4102 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2001, Number 5

<< Back Next >>

Acta Ortop Mex 2001; 15 (5)

Comparative effectiveness between lateral and medial approaches to correct valgus deformity (hallux valgus) higher than fifteen grades in total knee arthroplasty

Chaidez RP, Ilizaliturri SV, Valero GF, Renán LS, Aguilera ZJM
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 8
Page: 211-214
PDF size: 33.74 Kb.


Key words:

valgus, knee, total knee replacement, surgical approach.

ABSTRACT

Objective. Evaluate the convenience of the medial or lateral para-patelar approach for total knee replacement, in particular for those cases who have increased valgus. Material and methods. This is a retrospective trial about 13 out of the 14 women with TKR operated on from 1995 through 2000, who had preoperative valgus greater than 15 degrees. Lateral approach was used (not randomly) in 6 (60.8 years in av.; valgus 17.5°) and medial in 7 (70.4 years in av.; valgus 17.2°). Ethiology was arthrosis in the 6 lateral, and 5 arthrosis and 2 RA in medial approach. Results. As estimated by postoperative pain, joint stability and range of motion, results were good in 4 cases and poor in 3 for medial approach, while those were good in 5 cases and poor in 1 for the lateral approach. The only most outstanding result is the sharp difference between good and poor results for the lateral approach, which is somewhat favored in relationship to the medial approach, which actually meant no difference between good and poor results. Conclusion. Lateral parapatelar approach must be considered as a proposal for TKR, since a tendency to demonstrate a lesser rate of complications seems to arise in those cases who have an increased valgus of the knee.


REFERENCES

  1. Aglietti P, Buzzi R, Girón F, Zaccherotti G: The Insall-Burstein posterior stabilized total knee replacement in the valgus knee. The American Journal of Knee Surgery 1996; 9(1): 8-12.

  2. Aguilera Zepeda JM, Rivera Rivera J, Cruz López F: Abordaje lateral para la deformidad en valgo en la artroplastía total de rodilla. Rev Mex Ortop Traum 1998; 12(1): 48-52.

  3. Buechel FF: A sequential three-step lateral release for correcting fixed valgus knee deformities during total knee arthoplasty. Clin Orthop 1990; 260: 170.

  4. Clayton ML, Russell TT, Mack RP: Correction of alignment deformities during total knee arthroplasties: Staged- soft tissue releases. Clin Orthop 1986; (202): 117-24.

  5. Keblish PA: The lateral approach to the valgus knee. Clin Orthop 1991; 271: 52-62.

  6. Krackow KA, Jones MM, Teeny SM, Hungerford DS: Primary total arthroplasty in patients with fixed valgus deformity. Clin Orthop 1991; 237: 9-18.

  7. Stern HS, Moeckel BH, Insall JN: Total knee arthroplasty valgus knees. Clin Orthop 1991; 273: 5-8.

  8. Whiteside LA: Correction of ligament and bone defects in total arthroplasty of severely valgus knee. Clin Orthop 1993; 288: 234-45.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Acta Ortop Mex. 2001 Sep-Oct;15