medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Anales de Radiología, México

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2006, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Anales de Radiología México 2006; 5 (1)

Urotomography diagnostic yield in patients with hematuria

Calva AM, Murrieta GH, Acevedo TMT, Macías RKR
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 27-38
PDF size: 620. Kb.


Key words:

Hematuria, Computerized Tomography, Urotomography, CT Urography, Excretor Urography, Multiplanar reconstruction, Maxim Projection Intensity (MPI), Third Dimension (3D).

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Hematuria can be well evaluated with Computerized Tomography combining non contrasted phase, contrasted and of excretion. Previously the Excretor Urography was the diagnosis image method of election for urinary routes valuation; nevertheless, it presents limitations, reason why complementary image diagnose methods are required.
Objective: This study proposes Urotomography to replace Excretor Urography for the diagnosis by image of the different pathological entities conditioners of hematuria, since simultaneously allows the valuation of abdominal and retroperitoneal structures of simultaneous way and considerably diminish the necessity of complementary studies.
Material and Method: 39 patients with hematuria were evaluated with Helical Tomography in simple phase, nefrographic and elimination (Urotomography). Later Multiplanar reconstructions, 3D, MIP of the excretor phase were made.
Results: Of 39 evaluated patients 37 (94.8%) presented related findings to urinary routes, two (5.2%) were normal. Of the studied group 11 patients (28%) presented additional findings not related to urinary routes.
Discussion: Urotomography was useful to diagnose 94,8% of the patients evaluated by hematuria.
Conclusion: Urotomography is a useful method in the search of entities conditioning of hematuria.


REFERENCES

  1. Joffe S, Servaes S, Okon S, Horowitz M. Multi-detector row CT urography in the evaluation of hematuria. Radiographics 2003; 23: 1441-55.

  2. Kawashima A, Vrtiska TJ, LeRoy AJ, Hartman RP, McCollough CH, King BF. CT Urography. RadioGraphics 2004; 24: S35-S54.

  3. Edward JY, Maxwell VM, Peter RC. Evaluation of the patient with hematuria. Med Clin N Am 2004; 88: 329-43.

  4. Grossfeld, Litwin, Wolf, et al. Evaluation of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in adults: the American Urological Association best practice policy-part I: definition, detection, prevalence, and etiology. Urology 2001; 57: 599-603.

  5. Balcells A. La clínica y el laboratorio. 16a. Ed. Barcelona: Masson; 1993, p. 37-8.

  6. Kassiske B, Keane WF. Hematuria. In: Brenner B (ed.). The kidney. 5 th Ed. Vol 2. Philadelphia: Saunders Company; 1996, p. 1158-9.

  7. Glassock RJ. Hematuria. In: Masry SG, lassock RJ (eds.). Nefrología. Vol. 1. Buenos Aires: Editorial Médica Panamericana; 1985, p. 450-62.

  8. Foley WD. Multidetector CT: abdominal Visceral Imaging. Radiographics 2002; 22: 701-19.

  9. Lockhart ME. Technical considerations in renal CT. Radiol Clin N Am 2003; 41(5).

  10. Harris AC, Zwirewich CV, Lyburn ID, Torreggiani WC, Marchinkow LO. CT findings in blunt renal trauma. Radiographics 2001; 21: S201-S214.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Anales de Radiología México. 2006;5