medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Ingeniería Biomédica

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2007, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Ing Biomed 2007; 28 (2)

A network and data link layer design to improve QoS for voice and video in telesurgery

Pérez DJA, Zárate VH, Cabrera RC
Full text How to cite this article

Language: English
References: 8
Page: 62-69
PDF size: 133.16 Kb.


Key words:

Telesurgery, QoS, VoIP and videoconference.

ABSTRACT

The feasibility and practicability of performing telesurgery depend not only on the ability to overcome the barriers of surgery, but also on the ability to transmit data rapidly and securely. Telecommunications designers for telesurgery have focused in the transoceanic WAN links. However, if the WAN link is good enough but the Autonomous System (AS) Network to which the destination hospital belongs doesn’t have the proper configuration; applications running on top could have a very poor performance. This paper presents a network and data link layer infrastructure design that classifies and prioritizes voice and video traffic in order to improve the performance and QoS of telesurgery applications. This infrastructure has been designed taking into consideration a typical AS network, like the one at which end hospitals could connect. In this way, this model can be implemented in any hospital or autonomous system. After implementing it, we ran some tests inside a network laboratory which demonstrated an improvement greater than 75% in any kind of traffic transmission. This rate is enough to perform telesurgery and any real time application that uses voice and video.


REFERENCES

  1. Holt D, Zaidi A, Abramson J. Telesurgery: Advances and Trends. University of Toronto medical journal. Canada.

  2. Marescaux J, Rubino F. Telesurgery: Trend including robot assisted technology. Report of European Institute of Telesurgery (EITS). France.

  3. Rassweiler J, Binder J, Frede T. Robotic and Telesurgery: will they change our future? Current opinion in Urology. 2001

  4. WeBSurg’s World Virtual University. Operation Lindbergh: the surgical act crosses the Atlantic. New York – Strasbourg. 2001.

  5. Vegesna S. IP Quality of Service, Cisco Press, 2001. ISBN 1-57870-116-3.

  6. Pérez DJA, Zárate VH, Montes ACG. Quality of Service analysis of IPSec VPNs for voice and video traffic. IEEE Computer Society and IEEE Xplore Site. Proceedings of the Advanced International Conference on Telecommunication. February 2006. Guadaloupe, France. ISBN: 0-7695-2522-9

  7. Burgstahler L et al. Beyond Technology: The Missing Pieces for QoS Success. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2003 Workshops, Aug 2003: 121-130.

  8. Ubik S, Vojtech J. QoS in Layer 2 Networks with Cisco Catalyst 3350. CESNET Technical Report 3/2003.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Ing Biomed. 2007;28