medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Veterinaria México

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

1998, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Vet Mex 1998; 29 (1)

Pharmacokinetics of three sulfonamide-trimethoprim mixtures in pigs

Sumano LH, Ocampo CL, Abascal TG
Full text How to cite this article

Language: English/Spanish
References: 10
Page: 10-13
PDF size: 469.93 Kb.


Key words:

SULFONAMIDES, TRIMETHOPRIM, PHARMACOKINETICS, BIOAVAILABILITY, PIGS.

ABSTRACT

In order to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of three mixtures of sulfonamide-trimethoprim 21 mix-bred pigs, weighing 20 kg approximately, were randomly divided in three groups of 7 animals each. Each of the seven animals per group were dosed with 100 mg/kg of the following mixtures: sulfachlorpyridazine-trimethoprim (SCP-TMP); sulfamonomethoxine-trimethoprim (SMM-TMP) and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SMX-TMP) initially iv, respectively, and 15 days later orally as a bolus. Blood samples were collected by venipuncture of the auricular veins at increasing intervals, and the serum was separated by clotting and centrifugation. Serum samples were stored at -4°C, until analysis. Determination of serum concentrations of the mixture were carried out by the bacteriological agar-diffusion test, using pig serum as the vehicle and a sensitive strain of Escherichia coli as the test organism, with an intra-assay variation coefficient of 8%. Computer assisted compartmental pharmacokinetics was carried out. Results indicate greater bioavailability, higher peak serum concentrations and better apparent volumes of distribution for SCP-TMP. Although elimination half life values were slightly longer for SMM-TMP and SMX-TMP, clearance did not vary substantially among the three mixtures. It is concluded that there are important pharmacokinetic variations among these three apparently bioequivalent sulfonamide-trimethoprim mixtures. Information on the impact of these variations in clinical settings are discussed.


REFERENCES

  1. Prescott JF, Baggot JD. Antimicrobial therapy in veterinary medicine. Ames (IO): Iowa State University Press, 1993.

  2. Sumano LH, Ocampo CL. Farmacología veterinaria. 2a ed. México (DF): McGraw-Hill/Interamericana, 1997.

  3. Sumano LH, Fuentes HV, Ocampo CL. Pharmacokinetic aspects of a sulphachloropyridazine trimethoprim preparation in normal and diseased fowl. Br Poultry Sci 1990; 31:627-634.

  4. Bennet JB, Brodie JL, Benner EJ, Kirby WM. Simplified accurate method for antibiotic assay. Clinical specimens. Am Soc Microbiol 1966;14:170-177.

  5. Rowland M, Tozer TN. Variability in clinical pharmacokinetics: concepts and applications. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lea & Febiger, 1989.

  6. Fang W, Vikerpuur M. Potency of antibacterial drugs in milk as analysed by B-glucuronidase-based fluorometry. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 1995;18:422-428.

  7. Riviere E, Craigmill AL, Sundlof SF. Handbook of comparative pharmacokinetics and residues of veterinary antimicrobials. Boca Ratón (FL): CRC Press, 1991.

  8. Booth NH, McDonald LE. Veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics. 6th ed. Ames (IO): Iowa State University Press, 1988.

  9. Sumano LH, Ocampo CL. Bases farmacológicas de la vigilancia de residuos de fármacos en productos de origen animal. Vet Méx 1995;26:175-182.

  10. Mercer DW. Calculation of dosage regimens of antimicrobial drugs for surgical prophylaxis. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1984;185:1083-1085.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Vet Mex. 1998;29