medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Salud Mental

ISSN 0185-3325 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2007, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Salud Mental 2007; 30 (4)

¿Explica la esquizotipia la discordancia entre informantes de alteraciones conductuales adolescentes?

Medina C, Navarro JB, Baños I, Martinena P, Vicens-Vilanova J, Barrantes-Vidal N, Subirá S, Obiols JE
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 27
Page: 24-30
PDF size: 58.40 Kb.


Key words:

Behaviour problems, Achenbach, informants, adolescents, schizotypical personality.

ABSTRACT

Introduction
Behavioural alterations are a quite potent predictor for schizophrenia. Very often, apparently healthy adolescents (who will later develop schizophrenia) present altered conducts similar to those manifested by schizophrenic subjects and as predictors for the disorder. There are studies that describe the relationship between these behavioural alterations and the features found in schizotypical personality disorder or schizophrenic symptoms. In this way, it has been established that those subjects who obtain high scores in schizotypy present more behavioural alterations.
Concretely, the different behavioural alterations have been differentially related to the positive and negative subtypes of the schizotypical personality, suggesting continuity between the nature of premorbid conducts and the adult symptoms patterns in which the illness develops. On the other hand, comparing adolescents that will later develop schizophrenia with those who will not, it has been found that the best schizophrenia predictor is a poor behavioural adjustment. Moreover, if the teachers’ reports are examined, there can be certain aspects such as the early behavioural patterns which will identify children who, for instance, will develop schizophrenia thirty years later, or even differential patterns according to the gender of the subjects.
Therefore, if we want to carry out a schizophrenia prediction according to these behavioural criteria, knowing which informants are more useful and how their opinions match among them is of a great interest. Until this moment, the majority of studies have pointed out at the ability of teachers to identify conducts that can be used to select people at risk for schizophrenia. However, having into account that numerous studies conclude that there is a lack of agreement between these and other different informants for behavioural alterations in adolescents, the importance of studying the variables that can be influencing this matter must be raised. Following with the line of our research group a question is raised. We wonder if the presence of schizotypical personality traits makes the adolescents behaviour more ambiguous, with the consequent difficulty to define it in a coincident way from different evaluators and from themselves.
Objectives
To analyse the influence of the schizotypical personality (assessed with the Oxford-Liverpool Inventory of Feelings and Experiences), the demographic variable gender and the interaction between them, in the discordance of different informants (parents, teachers and adolescents) when they inform about behavioural problems in adolescents (assessed with the Achenbach’s scales). Methodology
This is an analytic transversal study that can be framed into a longitudinal study of 2 cohorts from the general population, which started on 2000 and has been then followed-up (“Psychoeducation program and early detection of schizophrenic disorders of adolescent onset”).
Participants. 160 triads of parents, teachers and adolescents from 13 to 16 years old selected from 7 schools of Barcelona took part in the study.
Instruments. The three forms of the Achenbach scale for the measure of behavioural alterations were applied: Youth Self- Report, Child Behaviour Checklist/4-18 and Teacher’s Report Form. These forms contain 8 scales which are invariant throughout informants: Withdrawn, somatic complaints, anxious/depressed, social problems, thought problems, attention problems, delinquent behaviour and aggressive behaviour. Some of them are grouped in second order factors: Internalizing, externalizing and total. To evaluate the psychometrical schizotypical personality of adolescents we used the Oxford-Liverpool Inventory for Feelings and Experiences. It consists of an autoadministered inventory with 159 items that includes four schizotypical scales. The Unusual Experiences scale reflects the positive dimension of schizotypy and includes items of unusual perception aberrations and magical thinking. The Introvert Anhedonia Scale reflects the negative dimension of schizotypy and consists of items assessing restricted affect, social isolation and anhedonia. The Cognitive Disorganization Scale refers to disorganized aspects of the psychosis and it is composed of items assessing difficulties in concentration and decision-making. Finally, the Impulsive Nonconformity Scale reflects the characteristics of impulsive-type personality, social anxiety and maladjusted behaviours.
Statistical proceed
Multiple regression analyses were carried out in order to revise the influence of the schizotypical personality, the demographic variable gender and the interaction between them as possible explicative variables, in the discordance between different informants about behavioural problems of adolescents. The dependent variable was a measure of the level of discordance between the three groups of informants.
Results
A major discordance between informants of behavioural problems was found as schizotypy was higher. Concretely, a larger number of unusual experiences in adolescents increase the discordance for thought and internalizing problems. Discordance is also higher in aggressiveness and anxiety/depression as cognitive disorganization increases. Also, the higher the introverted anhedonia, the higher the discordance is for social problems, anxiety/depression, attention, externalizing problems, and for the total.
To finish, a high score in non-conformity impulsivity increases the discordance for attention, delinquency and aggressive problems. About the influence of gender, discordance between informants for anxiety/depression is higher for females than for males. However, this varies when the interaction effects found are considered. In this way, a differential effect for the increase of non-conformity impulsivity and introvert anhedonia can be observed in males and females. Therefore, discordance between informants is higher when evaluating anxiety/ depression in males when non-conformity impulsivity is high. Just the opposite happens for girls. In addition, the discordance for the internalizing subscale increases just as the introverted anhedonia raises for females, but it decreases when evaluating males.
Discussion
It seems clear that no source of data can be substituted for any other when evaluating behavioural problems in adolescents and much less when attention is centred in those adolescents who score high in schizotypy.
Specifically, when evaluating the behaviour of those subjects who score high in the positive dimension of schizotypy, the agreement between informants decreases for thought and internalizing problems; and, when the behaviour of those who are defined for a more negative schizotypy is evaluated, the agreement decreases for social problems, anxiety/ depression, externalizing and total.
Having all this into account and adding information that other authors have found related to each schizotypy subtype (which, besides, are the ones which more concordance show), some conclusions could be raised. It can be assumed as evident that schizotypical personality (and each trait type) and the subjacent conduct in these subjects can generate a difficulty in perceiving certain conducts which are not predominant in the subject, with the consequent discordance between informants. For future studies, it would be very interesting to carry out studies examined which group of informants augurs the behavioural predisposition for schizophrenia and its dimensions in the most accurately way possible.
Conclusions
A most exact and objective method to assess behavioural problems as well-demonstrated predictor to schizophrenia, is necessary in order to select vulnerable teenagers to the illness and to develop programs of early intervention.


REFERENCES

  1. ABIKOFF H, COURTNEY M, PELHMAN WE, KOPLEWICZ HS: Teachers´ ratings of disruptive behaviors: The influence of halo effects. J Abnorm Child Psychol, 21:519-533, 1993.

  2. ACHENBACH TM, MCCONAUGHY SH, HOWELL CT: Child/adolescent behavioural and emotional problems: Implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. Psychol Bull, 101:213-232, 1987.

  3. ACHENBACH TM: Manual for the Youth Self-Report and 1991 profile. University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry. Burlington, 1991a.

  4. ACHENBACH TM: Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4-18 and 1991 Profile. University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry. Burlington, 1991b.

  5. ACHENBACH TM: Manual for the Teacher’s Report Form and 1991 Profile. University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry. Burlington, 1991c.

  6. ACHENBACH TM: Empirically based taxonomy: how to use syndromes and profile types derived from the CBCL/4-18, TRF, and YSR. University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry. Burlington, 1993.

  7. BARRANTES-VIDAL N, FAÑANAS L, ROSA A, CAPARROS B, RIBA D, OBIOLS JE: Neurocognitive, behavioural and neurodevelopmental correlates of schizotypy clusters in adolescents from the general population. Schizophr Res, 61:293-302, 2002.

  8. BENITEZ E, CHAVEZ E, ONTIVEROS MP: Crianza y esquizofrenia. Salud Mental, 28(2):59-72, 2005.

  9. BENTALL RP, CLARIDGE GS, SLADE PD: The multidimensional nature of schizotypal traits: A factor analytic study with normal subjects. Br J Clin Psychol, 28(4):363-375, 1989.

  10. BLAND JM, ALTMAN DG: Statistical method for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet, I:307-310, 1986.

  11. BLAND JM, ALTMAN DG: Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res, 8:135-160, 1999.

  12. CANNON TD, MEDNICK SA, PARNAS J: Antecedents of predominantly negative- and predominantly positivesymptoms schizophrenia in a high risk population. Arch Gen Psychiat, 47:622-632, 1990.

  13. CANNON M, JONES P, HUTTUNEN MO, TANSKANEN A y cols.: School performance in Finnish children and later development of schizophrenia: a population-based longitudinal study. Arch Gen Psychiat, 56:457-463, 1999.

  14. DAVIDSON M, REICHENBERG A, RABINOWITZ J, WEISER M, KAPLAN Z, MARK M: Behavioural and intellectual markers for schizophrenia in apparently healthy male adolescents. Am J Psychiat, 156:1328-1335, 1999.

  15. DINN WM, HARRIS CL, AYCICEGI A, GREENE P, ANDOVER MS: Positive and negative schizotypy in a student sample: neurocognitive and clinical correlates. Schizophr Res, 56:171-185, 2002.

  16. GUTIERREZ J, AGUILAR A, AGUILAR EM, BARRANTES- VIDAL N, OBIOLS JE: A Spanish reduced version of the Oxford-Liverpool Inventory of Feelings and Experiences (O-LIFE). Libro de Actas del V Congreso de Evaluación Psicológica: p.121, 1998.

  17. MASON O, CLARIDGE G, JACKSON M: New scales for the assessment of schizotypy. Pers Indiv Differ, 18(1):7-13, 1995.

  18. MEDINA C, NAVARRO JB, MARTINENA P, BAÑOS I y cols.: Evaluación de la conducta adolescente con las escalas de Achenbach: ¿Existe concordancia entre diferentes informantes? Salud Mental (en prensa), 2007.

  19. OLIN SS, JOHN RS, MEDNICK SA: Assessing the predictive value of teacher reports in a high risk sample for schizophrenia: a ROC analysis. Schizophr Res, 16:53-66, 1995.

  20. PARNAS J: From predisposition to psychosis: progression of symptoms in schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatr Scand (Supl), 395:20-29, 1999.

  21. SEIFFGE-KRENKE I, KOLLMAR F: Discrepancies between mothers´ and fathers´ perceptions of sons´ and daughters´ problem behaviour: a longitudinal analysis of parentadolescent agreement on internalising and externalising problem behaviour. J Child Psychol Psychiat, 39(5):687-697, 1998.

  22. SOURANDER A, HELSTELÄ L, HELENIUS H: Parentadolescent agreement on emotional and behavioral problems. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol, 34:657-663, 1999.

  23. VAN OSJ: Is there a continuum of psychotic experiences in the general population? Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc, 12(4):242-252, 2003.

  24. VERHULST FC, VAN DER ENDE J: Assessment of child psychopathology: Relationships between different methods, different informants and clinical judgement of severity. Acta Psychiatr Scand, 84:155-159, 1991.

  25. WALDECK TL, MILLER LS: Social skills deficits in schizotypal personality disorder. Psychiatry Res, 93:237-246, 2000.

  26. WATT NF, SAIZ C: Longitudinal studies of premorbid development of adult schizophrenics. En: Walker EF (ed). Schizophrenia: A life course developmental perspective. Academic Press, 157-192, Nueva York, 1991.

  27. YOUNGSTROM E, LOEBER R, STOUTHAMER-LOEBER M: Patterns and correlates of agreement between parent, teacher and male adolescent ratings of externalizing and internalizing problems. J Consult Clin Psychol, 68(6):1038-1050, 2000.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Salud Mental. 2007;30