medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Acta Médica Grupo Angeles

Órgano Oficial del Hospital Angeles Health System
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
    • Names and affiliations of the Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • About us
    • Data sharing policy
    • Stated aims and scope
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2008, Number 2

Next >>

Acta Med 2008; 6 (2)

Impact of the abdominal multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in medical practice. Retrospective evaluation of requests and diagnosis for MDCT

Motta RGA, Arroyo HG, Quiroz CÓ, Ramírez AJL
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 9
Page: 55-63
PDF size: 189.76 Kb.


Key words:

CT, computed tomography, MDCT, multidetector computed tomography.

ABSTRACT

A retrospective study was conducted to assess the impact of CTs performed at the Radiology Department in patients mainly with non-traumatic acute abdominal pain. One hundred and thirty patients were enrolled in the study. Using an ordering entry system, physicians were required to report their diagnosis before ordering the abdominal CT. Each patient´s outcome was reviewed by the surgical staff, through other imaging studies, or by clinical follow-up. In 18% of the cases, there was only one clinical feature similar to abdominal pain or other symptoms like cough or lipothymy in 25% of the cases. 42% of the cases were of suspicious clinical diagnosis with only one clinical clue and dependent on an answer by the MDCT. There was clinical diagnostic agreement in 44.8% of the cases, 55.1% differed with the MDCT diagnosis. Patients complaining of acute non traumatic abdominal pain can be a diagnostic challenge since many diseases have overlapping features. CTs performed in the Emergency Department increases the physician’s level of certainty, decreases hospital admissions and leads to more timely surgical intervention. CT significantly increased Emergency Department clinician diagnostic confidence and altered initial treatment decisions.


REFERENCES

  1. Vitello JM, Nyhus LM. Síntomas y su significado. En el libro: Vitello JM, Nyhus LM y Condon RE. Dolor Abdominal. Guía para el diagnóstico rápido. Edit. Médica Panamericana, 1996: 1-30.

  2. Malangoni MA, Brandt CP. Investigaciones auxiliares de Urgencia. En el libro: Vitello JM, Nyhus LM y Condon RE. Dolor Abdominal. Guía para el diagnóstico rápido. Edit. Médica Panamericana, 1996: 57-80.

  3. Vitello JM. Apendicitis. En el libro: Vitello JM, Nyhus LM y Condon RE. Dolor Abdominal. Dolor Abdominal. Guía para el diagnóstico rápido. Edit. Médica Panamericana, 1996: 81-103.

  4. Condon RE. Manejo clínico del dolor abdominal cuando el diagnóstico es dudoso. En el libro: Vitello JM, Nyhus LM y Condon RE. Dolor Abdominal. Guía para el diagnóstico rápido. Edit. Médica Panamericana, 1996: 243-247.

  5. Krestin GP, Choyke PL. Prefacio. En el libro: Krestin GP y Choyke PL. Abdomen agudo. Diagnóstico por imagen y su aplicación clínica. Edit. Marban 1997: vii-viii

  6. Krestin GP, Choyke PL. Diagnóstico por imagen. Métodos y hallazgos. En el libro: Krestin GP y Choyke PL. Abdomen agudo. Diagnóstico por imagen y su aplicación clínica. Edit. Marban 1997: 9-15.

  7. Rivera-Hernández ME, Rosales-Delgado F, Aguirre-Gas HG, Campos-Castolo EM et al. Recomendaciones específicas para el manejo del síndrome doloroso abdominal en los Servicios de Urgencias. Revista CONAMED 2007; 3: 4-23.

  8. Motta-Ramírez GA, Castillo Lima JA, Gómez del Campo A. Radiólogos, clínicos y atención médica. Revista de Sanidad Militar 1997; 51: 247-250.

  9. Ramírez-Arias JL, Rodríguez-Treviño C, Quiroz-Castro O, Motta-Ramírez GA. La comunicación del radiólogo con médicos tratantes y pacientes. Acta Médica 2008, en prensa.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Acta Med. 2008;6