medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Cirugía Endoscópica

ISSN 1665-2576 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2004, Number 3

<< Back

Rev Mex Cir Endoscop 2004; 5 (3)

Totally laparoscopic colectomy in diverticular disease: One shot technique

Rendón CE, Mancilla SG, Barrios SE, Peña GL, Ortiz LL
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 23
Page: 145-150
PDF size: 84.02 Kb.


Key words:

Totally laparoscopic colectomy, one shot technique.

ABSTRACT

The laparoscopic surgery for colorectal diseases have won a great popularity between general surgeons and colorectal surgeons although do not exist a general consent as a gold standard, as a result that is a very complex surgery and the dubious advantages of it´s cost-benefit. It´s has been describe three laparoscopic techniques, although the most polished between them is the totally laparoscopic technique. We have proposed this technique using only one circular stapler (one shot technique) avoiding the linear stapler replacing by umbilicals strips with the security of not contaminate the abdominal cavity. We reported the first case about a patient with diverticular disease and a sesil polip in sigmoid, were we decide to use this technique which is describe in detail, getting excellents results; although we require more cases to conclude that this technique is safe and effective, we consider as a real alternative.


REFERENCES

  1. Wexner SD, Johansen OB. Laparoscopic bowel resection: advantages and limitations. Ann Med 1992; 24: 105-110.

  2. Franklin M, Ramos R, Rosenthal D et al. Laparoscopic colonic procedures. World J Surg 1993; 17: 51-56.

  3. Larach SW, Salomon MC, Williamson PR et al. Laparoscopic assisted colectomy: experience during the learning curve. Coloproctology 1993; 1: 38-41.

  4. Schippers E, Tittel A, Ottinger A et al. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy: Comparison of adhesion-formation after bowel resection in a canine model. Dig Surg 1998; 15: 145-147.

  5. Wexner SD, Moscovitz ID. Colectomía mediante laparoscopia en enfermedad diverticular y de Crohn. Clin Quir Norteam 2000; 80: 1357-1379.

  6. Hackert T, Uhl W, Buchler MW. Specimen retrieval in laparoscopic colon surgery. Dig Surg 2002; 19: 502-506.

  7. Athanasakis H, Tsiaoussis J, Vassilakis JS, Xynos E. Laparoscopically assisted subtotal colectomy for slow-transit constipation. Surg Endosc 2001; 15: 1090-1092.

  8. Lozano DG, Montoya RJ, Aguilar SOA, Oviedo MVM, Gamiño OFJ, Perez CF. Resección de sigmoides y/o colon descendente por vía laparoscópica no asistida: experiencia en once pacientes. Cir Gen 2000; 22: 195-200.

  9. Lozano DG, Montoya RJ, Aguilar SOA, Oviedo MVM, Gamiño OFJ, Perez CF. Resección de sigmoides y/o colon descendente por vía totalmente laparoscópica: Experiencia en veinte pacientes. Cir Gen 2003; 25: 301-304.

  10. Maurantonis C, Wexner SD, Nogueras JJ, Weiss EG, Potente F, Pikarski AJ. Current attitudes in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 2002; 16: 1152-1157.

  11. Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Seshadri PA, Cadeddu M, Gregoire R, Poulin E. Defining the learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44: 217-222.

  12. Wisher JD, Baker Jr JW, Hoffman GC, Hubbard II GW, Gould RJ, Wohlgemuth SD, Ruffin WK, Melick CF. Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy. The learning curve. Surg Endosc 1995; 9: 1179-1183.

  13. Livingston EH, Passaro EP. Postoperative ileus. Dig Dis Sci 1990; 35: 121-132.

  14. Bufo AJ, Feldman S, Daniels GA, Lieberman RC. Early postoperative feeding. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37: 1260-1265.

  15. Reissman P, Cohen S, Weiss EG et al. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Ascending the learning curve. World J Surg 1996; 20: 277-281.

  16. Bosse L, Madsen JL, Billesbole P, Bardram L, Kehlet H. Gastrointestinal transit after laparoscopic versus open colonic resection. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 1919-1922.

  17. Hildebrandt U, Kessler K, Plusczyk T, Pistorius G, Vollmar B, Menger MD. Comparison of surgical stress between laparoscopic and open colonic resections. Surg Endosc 2003; 17242-246.

  18. Basse L, Thorbol JE, Lossl K, Kehlet H. Colonic surgery with accelerated rehabilitation or conventional care. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 271-278.

  19. Stocchi L, Nelson H, Young-Fadok TM, Larson DR, Ilstrup DM. Safety and advantages of laparoscopic vs open colectomy in elderly. Matched-control group. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 326-332.

  20. Tuech JJ, Pessaux P, Rouge C, Regenet N, Bergamaschi R, Arnaud JP. Laparoscopic vs open colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis. A prospective comparative study in the elderly. Surg Endosc 2000; 14: 1031-1033.

  21. Hackam DJ, Rotstein OD. Host response to laparoscopic surgery. Mechanisms and clinical correlates. Can J Surg 1998; 41: 103-111.

  22. Huscher C, Silecchia G, Crose E et al. Laparoscopic colorectal resection: A multicenter Italian study. Surg Endosc 1996; 10: 875-879.

  23. Ramos JM, Beart RW Jr et al. Role in laparoscopic in colorectal surgery. A prospective evaluation of 200 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38: 494-501.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Cir Endoscop. 2004;5