medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Salud Pública de México

Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2007, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

salud publica mex 2007; 49 (1)

Family functioning, self-esteem and substance use in adolescents: a mediational model.

Musitu G, Jiménez TI, Murgui S
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 34
Page: 3-10
PDF size: 100.98 Kb.


Key words:

adolescence, family functioning, self-esteem, substance use.

ABSTRACT

Objective: This research analyzes the direct and indirect relationships among family functioning, multidimensional selfesteem (family, academic, social, and physical self-esteem) and substance use. Materials and Methods: The study participants were composed of two independent samples of Spanish adolescents who provided information during the 2003-2004 academic year (n1= 414, Castilla & León; n2= 625, Comunidad Valenciana). The statistical analyses were carried out using structural equation modelling and the procedure of mediation effects analysis (Holmbeck, 1997). Results: Results showed a significant mediational effect of self-esteem on the relation between family functioning and adolescent substance use. Moreover, results showed, on the one hand, a protection effect of family and academic selfesteem in the face of substance use and, on the other hand, a risk effect of social and physical self-esteem. Conclusions: It is necessary to adopt a multidimensional perspective when analyzing the self-esteem of adolescents with substance use and to prevent the over-valuation of social and physical dimensions.


REFERENCES

  1. Observatorio Español sobre Drogas. Encuesta sobre drogas a población escolar. Madrid: Ministerio del Interior. Delegación del Gobierno para el Plan Nacional sobre Drogas, 2004.

  2. Butters JE. Family stressors and adolescent cannabis use: a pathway to problem use. J Adolescente 2002;25:645-654.

  3. Gilvarry E. Substance abuse in young people. J Child Psychology and Psychiatry 2002;41(1):55-80.

  4. Natera-Rey G, Borges G, Medina-Mora Icaza ME, Solís-Rojas L, Tiburcio-Sainz M. La influencia de la historia familiar de consumo de alcohol en hombres y mujeres. Salud Publica Mex 2001; 43(1):17-26.

  5. Bhattacharya G. Drug use among Asian-Indian adolescents: identifying protective/risk factors. Adolescence 1998;33:169-184.

  6. Fagan P, Brook JS, Rubenstone E, Zhang Ch. Parental occupation, education, and smoking as predictors of offspring tobacco use in adulthood: A longitudinal study. Addictive Behaviors 2005;30:517-529.

  7. Bogenschneider K, Wu MY, Raffaelli M, Tsay JC. Parent influences on adolescent peer orientation and substance use: The interface of parenting practices and values. Child Development 1998;69:1672-1688.

  8. Engels RCME, Vitaro F, Blokland EDE, de Kemp R, Scholte RHJ. Influence and selection processes in friendships and adolescent smoking behaviour: the role of parental smoking. J Adolesc 2004;27(5):531-544.

  9. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986;51(6):1173-1182.

  10. Butler RJ, Gasson, SL. Self Esteem/Self Concept Scales for Children and Adolescents: A Review. Child and Adolescent Mental Health 2005; 10(4):190-201.

  11. Emler N. Self esteem: The costs and causes of low self worth. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation,York Publishing Services Ltd, 2001.

  12. Laure P, Binsinger C, Ambard M-F, Friser A. L’intention des préadolescents de consommer des substances psychoactives. Les Cahiers Internationnaux de Psychologie Sociale 2004;62:89-95.

  13. Nóbrega D, Ferreira AS, Paredes TF, Anjos PA. Drugs consumption and its relation with self-concept. IX Conference of the European Association for Research on Adolescente. Porto (Portugal), 2004.

  14. Schroeder D, Laflin M, Weis D. The relationship between self-esteem and drug use: Methodological and statistical limitations of the research. J Drug Issues 1993;23:645-665.

  15. Harter S. Self and identity development. En: Feldman SS, Elliot GR, eds. At the threshold: The developing adolescent. Cambridge: MA Harvard University Press, 1990.

  16. Taylor SE, Brown JD. Positive illusions and well-being revisited: Separating fact from fiction. Psychological Bulletin 1994;116:21-27.

  17. Musitu G, Herrero J. El rol de la autoestima en el consumo moderado de drogas en la adolescencia. Sociotam: Revista Internacional de Ciencias Sociales 2003;13(1):285-306.

  18. O’Moore M, Kirkham C. Self-esteem and its relationship to bullying behaviour. Aggres Behav 2001;27:269-283.

  19. Musitu G, García J. Consecuencias de la socialización familiar en la cultura española. Psicothema 2004;16(2):288-293.

  20. Moos RH, Moos BS, Trickett EJ. Escalas de clima social. Madrid: TEA, 1984. (Adaptación española de R. Fernández-Ballesteros y B. Sierra).

  21. Olson DH, Portner J, Lavee Y. FACES III. St. Paul: University of Minnesota, 1985 (Adaptación española de Musitu, Buelga, Lila y Cava).

  22. Musitu G, Buelga S, Lila M, Cava MJ. Familia y adolescencia. Madrid: Síntesis, 2001.

  23. García F, Musitu G. Autoconcepto Forma 5. Madrid: TEA, 1999.

  24. Bentler PM. EQS Structural Equations Program Manual. Encino, CA, Multivariate Software, 1995.

  25. Holmbeck GN. Toward terminological, conceptual and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. J Consult Clin Psychol 1997;4:599-610.

  26. Sobel ME. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. En: Leinhardt S, ed. Sociological methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1982:290-312.

  27. McKinnon DP, Dwyer JH. Estimating mediated effects in prevention studies. Eval Rev 1993;17:144-158.

  28. Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equations Modeling 1999;6:1-55.

  29. West SG, Finch JF, Curran PJ. Structural equations models with nonnormal variables. En: Hoyle RH. Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1995:56-75.

  30. Hair JF, Anderson Jr RE, Tathman RL, Black WC. Análisis Multivariante. Madrid: Pearson Educación, 1999.

  31. Mead GH. Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1934.

  32. Alonso J, Román JM. Prácticas educativas familiares y autoestima. Psicothema 2005;17(1):76-82.

  33. Flisher AJ, Evans J, Muller M, Lombard C. Brief report: Test-retest reliability of self-reported adolescent risk behaviour. J Adolesc 2004; 27(2):207-212.

  34. Brendgen M, Vitaro F, Turgeon L, Poulin F, Wanner B. Is there a dark side of positive illusions? Overestimation of social competence and subsequent adjustment in aggressive and nonaggressive children. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2004;32(3):305-320.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

salud publica mex. 2007;49