medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Oftalmología

Anales de la Sociedad Mexicana de Oftalmología y Archivos de la Asociación Para Evitar la Ceguera en México
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2007, Number 5

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Oftalmol 2007; 81 (5)

Estudio comparativo entre esclerectomía e implante valvular Ahmed en glaucoma neovascular

Hernández DMSE
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 9
Page: 260-263
PDF size: 43.44 Kb.


Key words:

Neovascular glaucoma, sclerectomy, Ahmed glaucoma implant.

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To evaluate comparatively Ahmed implant versus sclerectomy for the treatment of neovascular glaucoma.
Patients and methods: All records of 16 patients that underwent sclerectomy and 43 patients that underwent Ahmed implant for the treatment of neovascular glaucoma secondary to diabetic retinopathy were reviewed. We analyzed data that included sex, age, pre and postoperative best corrected visual acuity as well as intraocular pressure and complications such as hiphema, choroidal detachment using t sample test at 3, 6 months and 1 year of follow-up.
Results: The comparison between the two groups regarding intraocular pressure showed a statistical difference (p‹0.05). Percentages also showed a difference in complications being more frequent in the sclerectomy group.
Conclusions. The use of Ahmed implant is a more reliable method than sclerectomy for the treatment of neovascular glaucoma according to our results. In some instances, in which Ahmed implants are not readily available, sclerectomy should be kept in mind as an alternative method of surgical treatment.


REFERENCES

  1. Kansky JJ. Oftalmología clínica. Mosby, 1992. 174-175.

  2. Cantor L y cols. Section 10: Glaucoma, AAO, 1996. 90-94.

  3. Shields MB y cols. The Glaucomas. Vol III. Mosby,. 1996. 1150-1154.

  4. Prata A y cols. In vitro and in vivo flow characteristics of glaucoma drainage implants. Ophthalmology 1995; 102:894-904.

  5. Coleman AL y cols: Initial clinical experience with the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant. AJO 1995; 120:23-31.

  6. Shocket S y cols. Anterior chamber tube shunt to an encircling band in the treatment of neovascular glaucoma and other refractory glaucomas. Ophthalmology 1985; 92:553-563.

  7. Krupin T y cols. A long Krupin-Denver valve implant attached to a 180 degrees scleral explant for glaucoma surgery. Ophthalmology 1988; 95:1174-1180.

  8. Montañez FJ, Lazo E, Suñer M, Amaya E. Ahmed drainage device implant. Our experience between 1995 and 2003. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 2005, 80(4):239-44.

  9. Das JC, Chaudhuri Z, Sharma P, Bhomaj S. The Ahmed Glaucoma Valve in refractory glaucoma: experiences in Indian eyes. Eye 2005; 19(2):183-90.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Oftalmol. 2007;81