medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Ginecología y Obstetricia de México

Federación Mexicana de Ginecología y Obstetricia, A.C.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2007, Number 04

<< Back Next >>

Ginecol Obstet Mex 2007; 75 (04)

Cornual ectopic pregnancy. A report of a case and five-year-retrospective review

Ramírez AL, Nieto GLA, Escobar VA, Cerón SMÁ
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 219-223
PDF size: 330.64 Kb.


Key words:

cornual ectopic pregnancy.

ABSTRACT

This article presents a clinical report of a cornual ectopic pregnancy as well as a five-year restrospective review of ectopic gestations at Hospital General de Matamoros Dr. Alfredo Pumarejo L, Tamaulipas, Mexico. The list with histopatological reports was checked up from January 2001 to May 2006. There were 66 results, of which only 31 files were complete. The presentation ages in these patients were between 16 and 39 years old, with a media of 25.6 years old and a mode of 21 years. The circumstances why patients attended to the hospital were: transvaginal bleeding and abdominal pain in 14 cases (45.1%), abdominal pain only in 12 cases (38.7%), and transvaginal bleeding only in five cases (16.2%). The clinical presentation was acute in 19 patients (61.3%), and it was insidious in 12 (38.7%). All women presented menstrual delay. Diagnoses were done by clinical findings in 12 women (38.7%), by clinical findings and ultrasonography in 18 (58.1%), and due to clinical findings and culdocentesis in just one patient (3.2%). Ectopic pregnancy was located in different places on each patient, such as: ampula, 24 cases (77.5%); isthmus, four patients (12.8%); fimbria, one case (3.2%); ovary, one woman (3.2%), and cornual in one patient (3.2%). Twenty-seven cases of broken ectopic pregnancies (87%), were found as transoperative findings, and the other four (13%) were not broken ectopic. There were not demises. Cornual ectopic pregnancy represents 1.5% of the ectopic gestations, as it is reported in the literature.


REFERENCES

  1. Iglesias BJL, Sordia HLH, Rosales TE, Salazar MAC. Embarazo ectópico. Experiencia de cinco años en el Hospital Universitario Dr José E. González de la UANL. Med Univer 2003;5(20):144-8.

  2. Enríquez DB, Fuentes GL, Gutiérrez GN, León BM. Clínicas y nuevas tecnologías diagnósticas en el embarazo ectópico. Rev Cubana Obstet Ginecol 2003;29(3).

  3. Ceniceros FLG, Rojas PG, Molina VP, Aldaco SF. Estudio retrospectivo del embarazo tubario ectópico en el Centro Médico ABC. Experiencia de cinco años. An Med Asoc Med Hosp ABC 2003;48(2):102-6.

  4. Vorhies RW, Waswick WA, Delmore JE, Dort JM, et al. Blunt abdominal trauma with ruptured 16-week cornual ectopic pregnancy. Am Surg 2004;70(6):559-60.

  5. Cortés AA, Garcia LE, Audifred SJ, González RPA. Embarazo cornual. Manejo laparoscópico y presentación de un caso. Ginecol Obstet Mex 1999;67(7):300-1.

  6. Inovay J, Marton T, Urbancsek J, Kadar Z, et al. Spontaneous bilateral cornual uterine dehiscence early in the second trimester after bilateral laparoscopic salpingectomy and in vitro fertilization: case report. Hum Reprod 1999;14(10):2471-3.

  7. Zarhi TJ, Campaña EC, Brito MR, Stuardo AP, et al. Manejo laparoscópico conservador de embarazo cornual. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol 2003;68(1):36-41.

  8. Tulandi T, Al-Jaroudi D. Interstitial pregnancy: results generated from the Society of Reproductive Surgeons Registry. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103(1):47-50.

  9. Oyawoye S, Chander B, Pablovic B, Hunter J, et al. Heterotopic pregnancy: successful management with aspiration of cornual/interstitial gestational sac and instillation of small dose of methotrexate. Fetal Diagn Ther 2003;18(1):1-4.

  10. Sanz LE, Verosko J. Hysteroscopic management of cornual ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99(5 Pt 2):941-4.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2007;75