medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Medicina Física y Rehabilitación

ISSN 1405-8790 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2008, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Med Fis Rehab 2008; 20 (2)

Learning process in training of physicians rehabilitation

Adame TJH, Cruz GYA, Medrano FlE, Garza QH
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 43-50
PDF size: 119.77 Kb.


Key words:

Learning process, perception.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: In the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit No.1 in Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, like in other centers that specialize in training medical residents the students are taught, mostly, using a traditional method of passive learning. Steps have been taken to train physicians emphasizing on clinical aptitudes. It is unknown if this methods produces a noticible change perceived by the student in the learning process. Methods: A transverse, descriptive, observational, from April of 2006 to January 2007 with 17 residents in rehabilitation medicine. A study design was constructed to evaluate the perception by medical residents dealing with 2 learning processes, a traditional or passive method and a hands-on approach. The validity of content and construction was archived by export consensus until a minimal concordance rate of 80% was reached. Confidence interval was obtained using the Kuder-Richardson pilot test and applied to residence and results were analyzed with central tendencies and a Kruskal-Wallis. Results: The validity obtained was 100%, the confidence interval was 0.83%, study material was conformed by 22 doubled mutually excluding items. The education method was perceived as low to moderately participative. Conclusion: The learning process is perceived a low to moderately participative.


REFERENCES

  1. Viniegra VL. Hacia otra concepción del currículo. México, IMSS, 1999: 24-61.

  2. Viniegra VL, Jiménez JL, Pérez Padilla JR. El desafío de la evaluación de la competencia clínica. Rev Invest Clin 1991; 43(1): 87-95.

  3. Todd LE. Anatomía de la educación algunos conceptos. Monterrey, Nuevo León 1987: 76-98.

  4. Viniegra VL. Los intereses académicos en la educación médica. Rev Invest Clin (Méx.) 1987; 39: 281-290.

  5. Lifshitz AL. La educación médica en perspectiva. Educación médica: Enseñanza y aprendizaje de la clínica. Editorial Auroch 1997: 2-8.

  6. Viniegra VL. Los problemas de la educación permanente en la medicina. Rev Fac Med UNAM 32:5 (septiembre-octubre) 246-249: 1989.

  7. Viniegra VL. La investigación como herramienta de aprendizaje. Rev Invest Clin (Méx.) 1988; 40: 191-197.

  8. Palacios JL. La cuestión escolar. México D. F.: Fontamara 1997: 11-23.

  9. Aguilar ME, Viniegra VL. La investigación en la educación: papel de la teoría y la observación. México: IMSS, 1999; 201-206, 67-86, 15-33.

  10. Aguilar M, Viniegra VL. El papel cambiante del profesor: un estudio en grupos de estudiantes de la licenciatura en pedagogía. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Educativos, primer trimestre, año/vol. XXVII num. 001, Centro de Estudios Educativos Distrito Federal, México. 115-145.

  11. Del Ángel AM, Aguilar ME, Viniegra VL. Un instrumento para estimar los efectos del proceso educativo en la percepción de sí mismo. Rev Med IMSS 1998; 36(1): 71-76.

  12. González CP, Viniegra VL. Comparación de dos intervenciones educativas en la formación de médicos residentes. Rev Invest Clin 1999; 51: 351-360.

  13. Pérez RB, Viniegra VL. Lectura crítica por profesores de medicina. Rev Med IMSS 1999; 37(2): 103-109.

  14. Rico GMI, Garza PG, Insfram SMD. Evaluación de la postura del docente ante la educación a través de dos miradas. Rev Enferm IMSS 2003; 11(1): 13-18.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Med Fis Rehab. 2008;20