Vázquez OVH, Sánchez NW, Rodríguez RJM, Flores BS, Hinojosa SLE, Ramos URA

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 238-246
PDF size: 147.43 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Forty eight patients that needed removable partial prostheses (RPP) were studied in order to find differences in the inhibitory reflex of the masseter muscle according to the RPP support. A base line reflexigram (RFXG) was obtained before treatment and a second RFXG when the patient was adapted to the RPP. Comparison of both RFXG’s to find differences among the two types of prostheses, finding an improvement. Statistical differences were found with the c2 there was an improvement on the left side. Statistical significance (p =0.05) in both types of prostheses for the left side compared to the entire upper. Other associations had no significant statistical differences. Although there was an improvement in the RFXG in most of the subjects after prosthetic placement, it is increased on the left side masseter, probably because the most of the subject’s right side (83.33%) had a bad RFXG, meanwhile the left side accounted for 35.41%.

REFERENCES

1. McGivney, Carr. McCraken. Prótesis parcial removible. Argentina. Ed. Médica Panamericana. 2004.

2. Vázquez OV, Sánchez NW, Hernández CA, Rodríguez RJ. Respuesta refleximétrica al uso de placa de mordida modelo Michigan. Revista ADM 2004; LXI(1): 14-25.

3. García C. Análisis de señales electromiográficas. Rev Mex Ing Biomed 1991; 12: 101-111.

4. Ángeles F, Nuño A, González H, Galicia A, García J. Refleximetría de los músculos maseteros: Un método objetivo para la evaluación de la función masticatoria. Arch Neurocien 1997; 2: 215.

5. Ángeles MF, Lópezlena GS, Alfaro MP, García MC, Galicia AA, Vázquez OV, García RJ, Rodríguez EM, Nuño LA, Sánchez NW, González GH. Cambios del reflexigrama inhibitorio masetérico en situaciones de interés clínico. Revista del Colegio Nacional de Cirujanos Dentistas A.C. 1994: 1(1).

6. Vázquez OV, Sánchez NW, García MC, Ángeles MF, González GH, García RJ, Rodríguez EM, Nuño LA. Exploración funcional masticatoria para predecir y supervisar la respuesta a prótesis totales. Revista Mexicana de Ingeniería Biomédica 1993; 14(2): 357-368.

7. Donnarumma GC et al. Bite force and silent period duration: Comparisons in normal subjects and TMD patients. J Dent Res 1986; 65: 180.

8. McCarroll RS et al. Influence of chin tap force and bite force parameters on the duration of the electromyographic silent period. J Oral Rehabil 1984; 11: 147.

9. Van der Glas H, Van Steenberghe D. Comments of standardization of reflex measurements in Human masseter muscle, including silent periods. J Oral Rehabil 1989; 16: 549-554.

10. Angeles F, Garcia C, Alatorre E, Llanos R, Garcia J, Bonillá M. Click and tap-evoked complete masseter EMG responses. J Dental Res 1989; 68: 226.

11. García C, Angeles F, García J, Nuño A, Llanos R. Primeros resultados clínicos de refleximetría masticatoria. Rev Mex Ing Biomédica 1989; 10(1): 37-53.

12. http://jagua.cfg.sld.cu/fisiologia/conferenciasest2/sistem_estomatognatico/ S.est.3.htm

13. Kreiner M. Efecto inmediato de las placas miorrelajantes sobre el periodo de silencio electromiográfico del músculo masetero, en pacientes que sufren dolor craneofacial crónico de origen muscular: Estudio metodológico descriptivo. Odontoestomatología 1999; VI: 6:37:48.

14. Beresin VE., Schiesser FJ. The neutral zone in complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 95: 93-101.

15. Kapur K, Soman S. The effect of denture factors on masticatory performance Part III. The location of food platforms. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 95: 265-73.

16. LaVere A, Krol A, Selection of a major connector for the extension-base removable partial denture. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 94: 207-8.