medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Oftalmología

Anales de la Sociedad Mexicana de Oftalmología y Archivos de la Asociación Para Evitar la Ceguera en México
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2003, Number 5

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Oftalmol 2003; 77 (5)

Manejo quirúrgico y complicaciones de la catarata congénita. Experiencia de cinco años en la Asociación para Evitar la Ceguera en México

Ochoa-Gómez ML, Fabila-Maya M, Ruiz-Quintero NC, Ruiz-Esmenjaud S, Navarro-López P, Garibay-Velázquez B
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 180-183
PDF size: 235.87 Kb.


Key words:

Phacoaspiration, continuous posterior capsulorhexis, congenital cataract, vitrectomy.

ABSTRACT

Purpose: A five-year retrospective study was made with the purpose to evaluate the surgical management and complications of congenital cataract and their treatment.
Method: A two-year follow-up was included. We studied 95 patients (190 eyes).
Results: The most common surgical technique was phacoaspiration with intraocular lens insertion. Continuous posterior capsulorhexis reduced the opacification of the posterior capsule up to 9.3%. The most frequent complication was the opacification of the posterior capsule (59.3%), followed by pupillary synechiae (30.4%) and intraocular lens subluxation (2.7%). Most severe complications were glaucoma and retinal detachment.
Conclusion: We recommend a close follow-up to avoid and detect these complications on time.


REFERENCES

  1. Foster A, Gilbert C, , Rahi J: Epidemiology of cataract in childhood: A global perspective. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1997; 23:601-604.

  2. Lambert S, Drack A: Infantile Cataracts. Survey Opthalmology, 1996; 40.6:427-451.

  3. Vaegan TD: Critical period for deprivation amblyopia in children. Trans Opthalmol Soc U K, 1979; 99:432-439.

  4. Dahan E, Salmenson BD, Levin J: Ciliary sulcus reconstruction for posterior implantation in the absence of an intact posterior capsule. Opthalmic Surg, 1989; 20:776-780.

  5. Gimbel HV, DeBroff BM: Posterior capsulorhexis with optic capture: Maintaining a clear visual axis after pediatric cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1994; 20:658-664.

  6. Zetterström C, Kulgelberg U, Ocarson C: Cataract surgery in chlidren with capsulorhexis of anterior and posterior capsules and heparin-surface modified intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1994; 29:599-601.

  7. Wang XH, Wilson ME, Bluestein EC y cols.: Pediatric cataract surgery and intraocular lens implantation techniques: A laboratory study. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1994; 20:697-609.

  8. Blunestein EC, Wilson ME, Wang XH y cols.: Dimensions of pediatric crystalline lens: implications for intraocular lenses in children. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus, 1996; 33:18-20.

  9. Wilson ME, Apple DA, Bluestein EC, Wang XH: Intraocular lenses for pediatric implantation: biomaterials,designs, and sizing. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1994; 20:584-591.

  10. Dennis SC, Lam F, Joan SK y cols.: Short-term results of scleral intraocular lens fixation in children. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1998; 24:1474-1479.

  11. O’Keefe M, Mulvihill A, Yeoh PL: Visual outcome and complications of bilateral Intraocular lens implantation in children. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2000; 26:1758-1764.

  12. Koch D, Kohnen T: Retrospective comparison of techniques to prevent secondary cataract formation after posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation in infants and children. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1997; 23:657-663.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Oftalmol. 2003;77