Heinze G, Vargas BE, Cortés SJF

Language: Spanish
References: 37
Page: 343-350
PDF size: 189.73 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Recent studies have shown an increase in psychiatric symptomatology in medical students and physicians during their professional practice. Some studies show that these professionals have a higher prevalence of psychiatric symptoms than the general population. This phenomenon is a consequence of the particular conditions of this professional activity, and, in the case of students, of high academic demands that lead to stressful situations that interfere with their academic performance and the development of clinical skills, which may have repercussions on their relationship with their patients.
The predominant symptoms are anxiety, depression and stress, as well as substance use; there has also been an increase in the number of students with suicide attempts. Most of these problems occur during the first two years of the degree course as well as the internship year. Depression is masked by anger, by virtue of the fact that it is an internalized form of anger.
It has also been documented that there is a significant link between certain personality traits and the presence or absence of mental symptoms, regardless of the situations to which people are exposed. The feature with the highest association with the presence of symptomatology is neuroticism, while the personality traits that are most conducive to the achievement of academic success and better adaptation and, therefore, a lower number of symptoms are empathy and kindness.
The purpose of this study was to establish a diagnosis of the mental health and personality traits of medical students in the high performance groups and compare them with those of the groups of students that performed poorly during the first two years of the degree course. This transversal, exploratory study involved the participation of 370 students from the UNAM Medical School: 220 belonged to the high performance groups, called educational quality nuclei (NUCE), while 150 were repeat students.
The variables considered were: age, sex, type of group (NUCE or repeat), academic year (first or second year of the degree), place of origin and type of high school from which they had graduated (public or private). Two instruments were used to measure personality traits and psychiatric symptomatology: the Big Five Personality Traits and the Symptom Check List-90.
The results of the study show that in both groups (repeat students and NUCE) over 85% were from the Federal District. Repeat students were mainly women (85.3%) and students from public schools (93.6%). As for the high performance group (NUCE), 83.1% were from private schools and just 16.9% from public schools.
Repeat students showed personality traits that included neuroticism and very little openness compared with the high performance groups, which displayed traits of greater openness and less neuroticism, with p‹0.01. In general, students from NUCE groups showed traits of greater extraversion, empathy and diligence compared with repeaters.
Psychiatric symptomatology was more severe among the repeat group than the NUCE group (p‹0.05). The psychiatric symptomatology displayed by both groups included: obsessioncompulsion, depression and anxiety. In the comparisons, the two groups showed significant differences in total symptomatology. There were also differences in the following symptomatology, by order of importance: phobia, interpersonal sensitivity, somatization, anxiety, obsessive-compulsive disorder and psychoticism (p‹0.05).
Differences were found between academic years, with secondyear students showing greater symptomatology; women displayed the greatest symptomatology. No differences were found for the interaction between sex and academic year.
The analysis of structural models was used to determine the relationship between the variables being studied, with significant correlation coefficients with p‹.05 being found between personality and sex, personality and type of high school, as well as type of group and suicidal ideation, academic year and psychiatric symptomatology, personality and suicidal ideation and personality and psychiatric symptomatology.
The results of the study coincided with those in the literature, although there were some differences between the two groups of students. Repeat students displayed greater levels of psychiatric symptomatology compared with students in the high performance groups. This suggests that students who perform less well in their degree courses also report higher mean responses in psychiatric symptomatology, mainly on scales of somatization, anxiety, phobia and interpersonal sensitivity.
As for type of personality, students in the high performance group reported higher average scores on the scales of extraversion, empathy and openness, with the exception of the neuroticism scale. This suggests that personality features may be predictors of better academic performance as well as greater intellectual skill. This finding is reinforced by the repeater group’s results, since they report higher scores in the personality trait of neuroticism. The diligence scale was the same for both groups.
The study corroborated the fact that second-year students display the greatest symptomatology, with women reporting higher averages in psychiatric symptomatology scores (mean=7.3). Sex is associated with greater empathy and solidarity, with women achieving higher scores in both personality traits. Although the neuroticism trait is also associated with the female sex and suicidal ideation, scores for this trait were higher for men. This trait can be considered a predictor for both suicidal ideation and the presence of a higher number of psychiatric symptoms.
Lastly, the symptomatology in which these students obtained the highest scores is related to the obsessive-compulsive disorder, a situation which we consider may be due to the type of screening test used.
It is a fact that studying medicine involves continuously stressful conditions. For these students, however, seeking help to cope with the presence of psychiatric symptomatology is extremely complicated since they regard it as a form of weakness. This raises the need to develop large-scale programs to orient students in order to enable them to identify symptoms at an early stage, which in turn will permit timely treatment.

REFERENCES

1. Tyssen R, Vaglum. Per mental health problems among young: An updated review of prospective studies. Hav Rev Psychiatry 2002;10(3):154-165.

2. Poole CJM. Improving outcomes in depression: Practice of medicine should carry health warning (letters). Br Med J 2002; 234(7339):737.

3. Friedman RC, Bigger TJ, Kornfeld DS. The intern and sleep loss. N Engl J Med 1971;285:201-203.

4. Friedman RC, Kornfeld DS, Bigger TJ. Psychological problems associated with sleep deprivation in interns. J Med Educ 1973; 48:436-441.

5. Vaillant E, Sobowale N, McArthur C. Some psychologic vulnerabilities of physicians. N Engl J Med 1972;287:372-375.

6. Small GW. House officer stress syndrome. Psychosomatics 1981;22:860-869.

7. Girard DE, Sack RL, Reuler JB. Survival of the medical internship. Forum Med 1980;3:460-463.

8. Davis RM. Sleep deprivation in graduate medical education IMJ 1981;160:146-149.

9. Loes MW, Scheiber SC. The impaired resident. Ariz Med 1981;10:777-779.

10. Asken MJ, Raham DC. Resident performance and sleep deprivation: a review. J Med Educ 1983;58:382-8.

11. Goldhamer P, Farine M. Resident night call. Time for a reappraisal. Ann R Coli Phys Surg 1985;18:19-21.

12. Ford CV, Wentz DK. The internship year: A study of sleep, mood status and psychophysiologic parameters. South Med J 1984;77:1435-1442.

13. Gordon GH, Hubbell FA, Wyle FA. Stress during internship: A prospective study of mood state. J Gen Intern Med 1986;1:228-231.

14. Uliana RL, Hubbell FA, Wyle FA. Mood changes during the internship. J Med Educ 1984;59:119-123.

15. Brazenor GA, Masterton JP. Achievement levels and mental health in medical students: a Monash University Study. Medical Education 1980;14(5):350-5.

16. Roberts LW, Warner TD, Trumpower D. Medical students’ evolving perspectives on their personal health care: clinical educational implications of a longitudinal study. Comprehensive Psychiatry 2000;41(4):14.

17. Bramness JG, Fixdal TC, Vgalum P. Effect of medical school stress on the mental health of medical students in early and late clinical curriculum. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 1991; 84(4):340-5.

18. Kendler KS, Neale M, Kessler R, Heath A, Eaves L. A twin study of recent events and difficulties. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1993;50:789-796.

19. Brostedt EM, Pedersen NL. Stressful life events and affective illness. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2003;107:208-215.

20. Kendler KS, Eaves LJ. Models for the joint effect of genotype and environment on liability to psychiatric illness. Am J Psychiatry 1986;143:279-289.

21. Grilo CM, McGlashan TH. Stability and course of personality disorders. Curr Opin Psychiatry 1999;12:157-162.

22. Costa PT, McCrae RR. NEO PI-R. The Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Odessa FL: Psychological Assesment Resources; 1992.

23. Magnus K, Diener E, Fujita F. Extraversion and neuroticism as predictors of objective life events: a longitudinal analisis. J Pers Soc Psychol 1993;65:1046-1053.

24. Breslau N, Davis G, Andreski P. Risk factors for PTSD-related traumatic events: a prospective analysis. Am J Psychiatry 1995;152:523-535.

25. Eysenck H, Eysenck S. Manual of the Eysenck Personality Quiestionaire. San Diego: Educational and Industrial Testing Service; 1975.

26. Watson D, Clark LA. Extraversión and its positive emotional core. En: Hogan R, Jonson J, Briggs S (eds.). Handbook of personality psychology. USA: Academic Press; 1997.

27. Pagano M. Stressful life events as predictors of functioning: findings from the Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2004;110:421-429.

28. Volkow ND, De la Fuente JR, Gómez MF, Cuevas L. Rasgos de personalidad de estudiantes de medicina. Nuevas posibilidades del MMPI. Rev Invest. Clin 1982;34(1):31-38.

29. Díaz MA, Romero M, Gómez C. Mental health in a simple of first-year university students. A descriptive study of Mexican population. New Trends Experimental Clinical Psychiatry 1996;XII:231-241.

30. Fiske DW. Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from the different sources. J Abnormal Social Psychology 1949;44:329-344.

31. Fouilloux C. La salud mental del estudiante de medicina de la UNAM. Tesis de Maestría en Psiquiatría. México: Facultad de Medicina, Depto. de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental, UNAM. 2002.

32. Tupes EC, Christal RE. Christal recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings (USAF ASD Tech. Rep., 61–97). Lackland Air Forc Base, TX: US Air Force: 1961.

33. Norman WT. Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes. Replicated factor structures in peer nomination personality ratings. J Abnormal Social Psychology 1963;66:574-583.

34. Bratko D, Chamorro-Premuzic T, Saks Z. Personality and school performance: Incremental validity of self-and peer-ratings over intelligence. Personality Individual Differences 2006;41:31-142.

35. Perales A, Sogi C, Morales R. Salud mental de estudiantes de medicina de la Universidad Nacional de Trujillo. Rev Semestral Fac Medicina Peruana 2002;2:21.

36. Chew-Graham CA, Rogers A, Yassin N. «I wouldn´t want it on my CV or their records»: medical student´s experiences of help-seeking for menthal health problems. Medical Education 2003;37:873-880.

37. Christensen H, Grifftiths K, Jorm AF. Delivering interventions for depresion by using the internet: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2004;328-265 (publicación electrónica 23 de junio, 2004).