medigraphic.com
ISSN 2594-1518 (Electronic)
ISSN 1405-0099 (Print)

2008, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Cir Gen 2008; 30 (4)

Comparison between usual sutures and usual sutures plus 2-octyl-cyanoacrylate in ureteral anastomosis. A model in dogs

Escalante PO, Nolasco CJ, Sosa CH, Rivera CJM

Language: Spanish
References: 25
Page: 215-219
PDF size: 70.06 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine whether ureteral anastomosis with suture and sealed with 2-octyl-cyanocrylate presents less urine leakage than the ureteral anastomosis using suture alone. Site: Laboratory of Training and Surgical Research, Military Medical School, Mexico City, Mexico. Design: An experimental, longitudinal, prospective, comparative and cause-effect study. Statistical analysis: Student’s “t” test and Fisher’s exact test. Material and methods: This study was carried out on 10 dogs whose both ureters were sectioned and anastomosed: the right side with suture and sealing by 2-octyl-cyanoacrylate, and the left side with single suture. After 21 days, the dogs were performed an excretory urogram. Analyzed variables: Operation time, volume of post-operative drainage, time of post-operative stay of the retroperitoneal drainage, and excretory urogram data. Results: The operation time was the same for both groups. In the group of 2-octyl-cyanoacrylate, the volume of retroperitoneal drainage, the days the drainage system stayed, renal exclusion and the drainage of the contrast means through the suture line were less than in the other group; the concentration and elimination of the means of contrast were higher. Conclusions: Sealing the suture line of a ureteral anastomosis with 2-octyl-cyanocrylate offers better results than suture alone.


REFERENCES

  1. Aivazian AV, Kiparisov LN, Poliakova AM. Results of using cyanoacrylate glue in experimental surgery on the kidney. Eksp Khir Anesteziol 1970; 16: 27-30.

  2. Kumar U, Albala DM. Fibrin glue applications in urology. Curr Urol Rep 2001; 2: 79-82.

  3. Marcovich R, Williams AL, Rubin MA, Wolf JS Jr. Comparison of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate adhesive, fibrin glue and suturing for wound closure in the porcine urinary tract. Urology 2001; 57: 806-10.

  4. Bardari F, D’Urso L, Muto G. Conservative treatment of iatrogenic urinary fistula: the value of cyanoacrylic glue. Urology 2001; 58: 1046-8.

  5. Seifman BD, Rubin MA, Williams AL, Wolf JS. Use of absorbable cyanoacrylate glue to repair an open cystostomy. J Urol 2002; 167: 1872-5.

  6. Pursifull NF, Morey AF. Tissue glues and nonsuturing techniques. Curr Opin Urol 2007; 17(6): 396-401.

  7. García NLM, Padilla SR, Cabello PR, Lever RCD, Rosales ME, Mendoza ALA, et al. Traumatismo ureteral. Un auténtico reto para el cirujano de trauma. Medicina Universitaria 2005; 7: 147-52.

  8. Best CD, Petrone P, Buscarini M, Demiray S, Kuncir E, Kimbrell B, et al. Traumatic ureteral injuries: a single institution experience validating the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma - Organ Injury Scale grading scale. J Urol 2005; 173: 1202-5.

  9. Passerini-Glazel G, Meneghini A, Aragona F, Oliva G, Milani C, Pagano F. Technical options in complex ureteral lesions: “ureter-sparing” surgery. Eur Urol 1994; 25: 273-80.

  10. Stefanoviæ KB, Bukurov NS, Marinkoviæ JM. Non-antireflux versus antireflux ureteroneocystostomy in adults. Br J Urol 1991; 67: 263-6.

  11. Ahn M, Loughlin KR. Psoas hitch ureteral reimplantation in adults – analysis of a modified technique and timing of repair. Urology 2001; 58: 184-7.

  12. O’Connor RC, Hollowell CM, Steinberg GD. Distal ureteral replacement with tubularized porcine small intestine submucosa. Urology 2002; 60: 697.

  13. Ehrilch RM, Skinner DG. Complications of transureteroureterostomy. J Urol 1975; 113: 467-3.

  14. Grossklaus DJ, Pope IV JC, Adams MC, Brock JW. Is postoperative cystography necessary after ureteral reimplantation? Urology 2001; 58: 1041-5.

  15. Shekarriz B, Lu H, Duh Y, Freise CE, Stoller ML. Laparoscopic nephrectomy and autotransplantation for severe iatrogenic ureteral injuries. Urology 2001; 58: 540-3.

  16. Philpott JM, Nance ML, Carr MC, Caanning DA, Stafford PW. Ureteral stenting in the management of urinoma after severe blunt renal trauma in children. J Pediatr Surg 2003; 38: 1096-98.

  17. Elliott SP, McAninch JW. Ureteral injuries: external and iatrogenic. Urol Clin North Am 2006; 33: 55-66.

  18. Brandes SB, McAninch JW. Reconstructive surgery for trauma of the upper urinary tract. Urol Clin North Am 1999; 26(1): 183-99.

  19. Waldner M, Hertle L, Roth S. Ileal ureteral substitution in reconstructive urological surgery: is an antireflux procedure necessary? J Urol 1999; 162: 323-6.

  20. Asensio JA, Petrone P, O’Shanahan G, Kuncir E. Managing exsanguination. What we know about damage control/bail out is not enough. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2003; 16: 294-6.

  21. García-Nunez LM, Magaña SIJ, Loyola VHF, Belmonte MC, Rosales ME. Manejo con técnica de abdomen abierto en pacientes críticos. Experiencia de dos años en el Hospital Central Militar. Rev Sanid Milit Mex 2003; 57: 232-6.

  22. Carlin BI, Resnick MI. Indications and techniques for urologic evaluation of the trauma patient with suspected urologic injury. Semin Urol 1995; 13: 9-24.

  23. Selzman AA, Spinnak JP. Iatrogenic ureteral injuries: A 20-year experience in treating 165 injuries. J Urol 1996; 155: 878-81.

  24. Smith AM. Injuries of the pelvic ureter. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1975; 140: 761-4.

  25. Mianné D, Bertrand S, N’Guyen P. Non-iatrogenic injuries of the ureteral. Ann Urol (Paris) 1997; 31: 281-7.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com