medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista del Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias

A partir del año 2010, la Revista Oficial del INER cambió a NCT (Neumología y Cirugía de Tórax)

Ver actualización

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2005, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Inst Nal Enf Resp Mex 2005; 18 (1)

Correlation between virtual bronchoscopy and fiberoptic bronchoscopy in non-neoplasic stenosis of the larger airways

Chay L, Criales JL, Peña J, Páramo R, Navarro F, Cicero R
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 22-26
PDF size: 68.70 Kb.


Key words:

Fiberoptic bronchoscopy, virtual bronchoscopy, helicoidal tomography, tracheal stenosis, bronchial stenosis, airway resection, laser.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Imaging of the larger airways can be done by fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) or by virtual bronchoscopy by means of three dimensional helical computed tomography (VBHCT3D).
Objectives: To compare the differences of both methods for the assessment of non neoplastic stenosis of the trachea and main bronchi, as diagnostic tools helpful in the planning of treatment in such cases.
Material and methods: Sixteen cases, 6 women and 10 men, ages 16 to 57, mean 33 years; clinical course 2 to 108 months, mean 8 months. In all: FOB and VBHCT3D. Sensitivity (Se) and Specificity (Sp) were determined and statistical significance for both methods and Pearson’s r for length and degree of the stenotic segment using VBHCT3D. Results: Location: 7 cases with subglotic and 4 with tracheal stenosis, 2 cases tracheal collapse, 1 case stenosis of the left main bronchus, 2 granulomas of the trachea. Etiology: 7 cases post tracheal intubation, 5 cases post traumatic, 1 post tracheostomy, 2 tracheomalacia, 1 granulomatous disease. Treatment: 7 Grillo-Pearson’s technique, five resection of the large airways and terminoterminal anastomosis, 1 dilatation, 1 laser therapy, 2 non-surgical. For the detection of stenosis, FOB and VBHCT3D had 100% Se and Sp; for the degree of stenosis. FOB had 100% Sp and Se, VBHCT3D had 60% Se and Sp. To evaluate the length of stenosis, FOB could not pass the obstruction in 12 cases. In the 12 surgical cases, for VBHCT3D there was exact correlation in 7 and a 10% mean error in 5 cases. For the length of the stenosis in the freshly resected specimen, Pearson’s r by VBHCT3D p≤ 0.05 –r=0.7782, degree of stenosis p≤ 0.01 –r=0.9534. All 12 resected specimens showed various degrees of fibrosis, chronic inflammation, epidermoid metaplasia and granulomas.
Conclusions: VBHCT3D can detect degree and length of stenosis, but the gold standard for stenosis and degree is FOB, but in severe cases the instrument can not pass the obstruction and assess its length. VBHCT3D detects degree and length of stenosis non invasively and is expensive. FOB visualizes stenosis and its degree with precision, is less expensive. Both methods are helpful in the diagnosis of degree and lenght of the obstruction and in the planning of surgical treatment.


REFERENCES

  1. Di Rienzo S. Radiologic exploration of the bronchus. Ill. Springfield: Ch C Thomas Publisher;1949.

  2. Jackson Ch, Jackson ChL. Otorrinolaringología y broncoesofagología. (tr. española). México: UTEHA;1949.

  3. Prakash UBS. Bronchoscopy. New York: Raven Press; 1992.

  4. Haponik EF, Aquino SL, Vining DJ. Virtual bronchoscopy. Clin Chest Med 1999;20:201-217. (Bronchoscopy in the 21st Century. Special Issue).

  5. Hoppe H, Walter B, Sonnenschein M, Meter Vock, Dintel H-P. Multidetector CT virtual bronchoscopy to grade tracheobronquial stenosis. Am J Roentgenol 2002;178:1195-1200.

  6. White ChS, Boiselle PhM. Lung cancer screening: past, present, and future. In: Boiselle PhM, White ChS, editors. New techniques in thoracic imaging. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2002. p. 1-21.

  7. Choi JR, Boiselle PhM. Multidetector helical CT. In: Boiselle PhM, White ChS, editors. New techniques in thoracic imaging. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2002. p. 71-90.

  8. Finkelstein SE, Schrump DS, Nguyn DM, Hewitt SM, Kunst TF, Summers RM. Comparative evaluation of super high-resolution CT scan and virtual bronchoscopy for the detection of tracheobronchial malignancies. Chest 2003;124:1834-1840.

  9. Finkelstein SE, Summers RM, Nguyen DM, Schrump DS. Virtual bronchoscopy for evaluation of airway disease. Thorac Surg Clin 2004;14:79-86.

  10. Ernest A, Feller-Kopman D, Becker HD, Metha A. Central airways obstruction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004;160:1278-1297.

  11. Boiselle PhM, Ernst A. Recent advances in central airway imaging. Chest 2002;121:1651-1660.

  12. Milestone BN, Adler LP. Radiographic assessment of airway tumors. Chest Surg Clin N Am 2003;13:63-77.

  13. García-O JG, Aguilar-R MP, Pérez-Romo A, Navarro-R F, Cicero-S R. Patología traqueal diagnosticada por fibrobroncoscopía. Experiencia en 111 casos. Rev Inst Nal Enf Resp Mex 2004;17:67-72.

  14. Ko-Peng W, Metha A, Turner Jr, JF. Flexible bronchoscopy. 2nd ed. Malden Mass: Blackwell Publishing;2004.

  15. Laccourreye OL, Brasnu D, Seckin AS, Hans S, Biacabe, Laccourreye H. Cricotracheal anastomosis for assisted ventilation-induced stenosis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;123:1074-1077.

  16. Peña J, Cicero R, Marín J, Ramírez M, Cruz S, Navarro F. Laryngotracheal reconstruction in subglottic stenosis: An ancient problem still present. Head Neck Surg 2001;125:337-340.

  17. Brinchet A, Verkindre J, Dupont J, et al. Multidisciplinary approach to management of postintubation tracheal stenoses. Eur Respir J 1999;13:888-893.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Inst Nal Enf Resp Mex. 2005;18