medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Gaceta Médica de México

ISSN 0016-3813 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2009, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Gac Med Mex 2009; 145 (1)

Estudio piloto de dos diferentes estrategias para reforzar conductas de autocuidado y adherencia al tratamiento en pacientes de bajos recursos económicos con diabetes tipo 2

Lerman I, López-Ponce A, Villa AR, Escobedo M, Caballero EA, Velasco ML, Gómez-Pérez FJ, Rull-Rodrigo JA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 29
Page: 15-20
PDF size: 77.27 Kb.


Key words:

Reinforcement strategies, diabetes self-management.

ABSTRACT

Long term diabetes self-management behaviors, and strict glycemic control are difficult to achieve in clinical practice. Objective: Asesss two different reinforcement strategies for diabetes self care management, psychological distress and glycemic control in a one year follow up study. Methods: 70 consecutive type 2 diabetic patients, were recruited and randomly assigned to three study groups. Subjects in the control group (CG) continued with their normal treatment schedule. The second group received a reinforcement course at 6 months (RCG) and in the third group, patients were contacted monthly by phone (PHCG) to promote self-management attitudes and address problems as they arose. A battery of questions and laboratory work-up were obtained at baseline and at one year follow-up. Results: At one year follow-up, the three groups significantly increased their diabetes-related knowledge. Both experimental groups displayed improved treatment compliance and had better adherence to the recommended meal plan (p= 0.06 and 0.003). In addition, the PHCG significantly increased (p‹0.0001) their adherence to pharmacological treatment. No significant differences were observed in glycemic control, prevalence of depression or diabetes related distress. Conclusions: Follow-up patient reinforcement strategies improve strategic diabetes self-care management behaviors. Further studies are needed to demonstrate the positive impact of these benefits on diabetes related outcomes.


REFERENCES

  1. Lerman I, Goméz-Pérez FJ, Quibrera R. Epidemiology of diabetes in Mexico.En: Ekoe JM, Zimmet P, Williams R, eds. The epidemiology of diabetes. An international perspective. Baffins Lane, Chichester, West Sussex, England: John Wiley and Sons Ltd; 2001. pp. 177-186.

  2. Bennet-Johnson S. Methodological issues in diabetes research. Measuring adherence. Diabetes Care 1992;15:1658-1667.

  3. Kurtz SM. Adherence to diabetes regimens: Empirical status and clinical applications. Diabetes Educator 1990;16:50-56.

  4. Norris SL, Lau J, Smith SJ, Schmid CH, Engelgau MM. Self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic control. Diabetes Care 2002;25:1159-1171.

  5. Clement S. Diabetes self management education. Diabetes Care 1995;18:1204-1214.

  6. Norris SL, Engelgau MM, Venkat-Narayan KM. Effectiveness of selfmanagement training in type 2 diabetes: A systemic review of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care 2001;24:561-587.

  7. Hynes RB. Helping patients follow prescribed treatment: Clinical implications.JAMA 2002; 288:2880-2883.

  8. Greco P, La Greca AM, Ireland S, et al. Assessing adherence in IDDM: A comparison of two methods. Diabetes 1990;1:64.

  9. Whooley MA, Avins AL, Mirnada J, Browner WS. Case finding instruments for depression. Two questions are as good as many. J Gen Intern Med 1997;12:439-445.

  10. Lerman I, Barrón C, Calzada LR, et al. Emotional dysfunction associated to diabetes in Mexican adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes. Salud Publica Mex 2003;45:13-18.

  11. Polonsky WH, Anderson BJ, Lohrer PA, et al. Assesment of diabetes related distress. Diabetes Care 1995;18:754-760.

  12. Bautista MS, Aguilar-Salinas CA, Lerman I, et al. Diabetes knowledge and its determinants in a Mexican Population. Diabetes Educator 1999;25:3-9.

  13. McDonald HP, Garq AX, Haynes RB. Interventions to enhance patient adherence to medication prescriptions: Scientific review. JAMA 2002;288:2868- 2879.

  14. Polonsky WH, Earles J, Smith S, et al. Integrating medical management with diabetes self-management training: A randomized control trial of the diabetes outpatient intensive treatment program. Diabetes Care 2003;26:3048-3053.

  15. Gagliardino JJ, Etchegoyen G. PENDID-LA Research Group. A model educational program for people with type 2 diabetes: A cooperative Latinamerican implementation study (PEDNID-LA). Diabetes Care 2001;24:1001-1007.

  16. Domenech MI, Assad D, Mazzei ME, Kronsbein P, Gagliardino JJ. Evaluation of the effectiveness of an ambulatory teaching/ treatment programme for non-insulin dependent (type 2) diabetic patients. Acta Diabetol 1995;32:143-147.

  17. Corkery E, Palmer C, Foley M, Schechter C, Fisher L, Roman S. Effect of a bicultural community health worker on completion of diabetes education in a Hispanic population. Diabetes Care 1997;20:254-257.

  18. Brown S, Garcia A, Kouzekanany K, Hanis C. Culturally competent diabetes self-management education for Mexican Americans. Diabetes Care 2002;25:259-268.

  19. Trento M, Passera P, Borgo E, et al. A 5-year randomized controlled study of learning, problem solving ability, and quality of life modifications in people with type 2 diabetes managed by group care. Diabetes Care 2004;27:670-675.

  20. Lorig K, Ritter Pl, Villa F, Piette JD. Spanish diabetes self-management with and without automated telephone reinforcement. Diabetes Care 2008;31:408- 414.

  21. Lerman I, Lozano L, Villa AR, et al. Psychosocial factors associated with poor diabetes self care management in a specialized Center in Mexico City. Biomed Pharmacother 2004;58:566-570.

  22. Caballero AE, Yohai F, De Villar N, Monzillo L, Romero A, Lerman I, et al.The short and long term effect of a non traditional culturally oriented diabetes education program on the metabolic control of Hispanic patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 2002;51:A77.

  23. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood glucose control wih sulfonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients ith type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998;352:837.

  24. Renders CM, Valk GD, Griffin SJ, Wagner EH, Thom EJ, Assendelft WJJ.Interventions to improve the management of diabetes in primary care, outpatient and community settings. A systematic review. Diabetes Care 2001;24:1821-1833.

  25. Smaldone A, Ganda OP, McMurrich S, et al. Should group education classes be separated by type of diabetes? Diabetes Care 2006;29:1656-1658.

  26. Trento M, Passera P, Tomalino M, et al. Group visits improve metabolic control in type 2 diabetes: A 2-year follow-up. Diabetes Care 2001;24:995-1000.

  27. Venkat-Narayan KM, Gregg EW, Engelgau MM, et al. Translation research for chronic disease. The case of diabetes. Diabetes Care 2000;23:1794-798.

  28. Wing RR, Goldstein MG, Acton KJ, et al. Behavioral science in diabetes.Diabetes Care 2001;24:117-123.

  29. Lerman I. Adherence to treatment: The key for avoiding long term complications of diabetes. Arch Med Res 2005;36:300-306.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Gac Med Mex. 2009;145