FM Barbetta, EL Mazzucato, AM Salathiel, NT Foss, MAC Frade

Language: English
References: 9
Page: 28-32
PDF size: 156.82 Kb.

Text Extraction

Introduction: Leg ulcers are a syndrome characterized by loss of tegument that affect the lower extremities usually caused by vascular system dysfunction, representing a high morbidity chronic disease especially among the aged. This study determined the epidemiological characteristics of leg ulcer patients seen at Clinical Hospital Ribeirão Preto from 1991 to 2001, and their main etiologies and the resolving nature of the treatments applied were investigated.
Method: This was a descriptive retrospective study (case series) analyzing 199 medical records of leg ulcer patients, coded by the Medical Records from 1991 to 2001.
Results: 51% of the patients were women and 49% men, with respective median ages of 65 and 66 years, and 81% were white. Etiologically, 49% were classified as venous ulcers, 15% arterial, 9% neuropathic, 2% anemic, and 20% were not classified. Approximately 40% of the patients had been wounded for more than 1 year, 13% died, 40% discharged, and 45% evolved with chronic disease. Among the discharged patients, 64% of those with arterial ulcers and 80% of those with neurotrophic ulcers underwent amputation of the segment involved. Regarding venous ulcers, only 37% of the patients were discharged, after local dressing in 56% of cases and after skin graft in only one.
Comment: Leg ulcer disease was found to be an important chronic disease among the patients seen at the Clinical Hospital Ribeirão Preto from 1991 to 2001, with severe consequences regarding the arterial and neurotrophic ulcers, although the etiologic diagnosis was unknown or neglected in 20.1% of the cases.

REFERENCES

1. Frade MAC, Cursi IB, Andrade FF, Soares SC, Ribeiro WS, Foss NT et al. Estudo clínico-epidemiológico de úlceras de perna em Juiz de Fora e região. 9º Simpósio Internacional de Iniciação Científica da Universidade de São Paulo (SIICUSP), Ribeirão Preto, 2001.

2. Frade MAC, Cursi IB, Andrade FF, Soares SC, Ribeiro WS, Santos AV, Foss NT. Úlceras de perna: um estudo de casos em Juiz de Fora-MG (Brasil) e região. An Bras Dermatol 2005;80:41-6.

3. Grinell F, Ho CH, Wysocki A. Degradation of fibronectin and vitronectin in chronic wound fluid: Analysis by cell blotting, immunoblotting and cell adhesion assays. J Invest Dermatol 1992;98:410-6.

4. Callam MJ, Harper DR, Dale JJ, Ruckley CV. Chronic ulcer of the leg: clinical history. BMJ 1987;294:1389-91.

5. Phillips TJ. Chronic cutaneous ulcers: etiology and epidemiology. J Invest Dermatol 1994; 102:38S-41S.

6. Cordts PR, Hanrahan LM, Rodriguez AA, Woodson J, LaMorte WW, Menzoian JO. A prospective, randomized trial of Unna’s boot versus Duoderm CGF hydroactive dressing plus compression in the management of venous leg ulcers. J Vasc Surg 1992;15:480-6.

7. Fivenson D, Scherschum L. Clinical and economic impact of Apligrat for the treatment of nonhealing venous leg ulcers. Int J Dermatol 2003;42: 960-65.

8. Gourdin FW, Smith JG Jr. Etiology of venous ulceration. Southern Medical Journal 1993;86:1142-5.

9. Heit JA, Rooke TW, Silverstein MD, Mohr DN, Lohse CM, Petterson TM et al. Trends in the incidence of venous stasis syndrome and venous ulcer: a 25 year population-based study. J Vasc Surg 2001;33:1022-7.