medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Pediatría

ISSN 0035-0052 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2005, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Pediatr 2005; 72 (1)

Early feeding for suction in premature babys below 1,800 g

Nieto-Sanjuanero A,Rodríguez-Balderrama I, Garrido-Garza D, Rodríguez JA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 9-12
PDF size: 45.92 Kb.


Key words:

Premature babys, breastfeeding, early feeding..

ABSTRACT

Objective. To study the weight gain of premature neonates with less of 1,800 g when they are feeding with a premature milk formula by suction.
Material and methods. The study was done in 140 prematures: 70 cases and 70 controls. All of them ‹ 1,800 g and under conditions of feeding for enteral tract. The study group received the formula when arriving to requirements of 150 mL/kg/day and the control group made it when they weight 1,800 g. The variables evaluated were: weight gain, volume of milk ingested and weight at hospital discharge.
Results. The study group begin earlier suction (10.4 ± 8.3 days vs 29.3 ± 13.1 days); the weight gain was better (18.7 ± 8.7 g vs 10.8 ± 4.7 g), and the volume of milk ingested (372.5 ± 69.4 mL/day vs 273.2 ± 31.2 mL/day).
Conclusions. The early feeding by suction in premature babys of 34 weeks doesn’t interfere with the gain of weight; there is a quicker increment of weight against those fed by probe and the time of stay it shortens so the cost to the institution.


REFERENCES

  1. Simpson CH, Schanler R. Early Introduction of oral feeding in preterm infants. Pediatrics 2002; 110: 517-522.

  2. Chantal L, Sheena H. Oral feeding in low birth weight infants. J Pediatr 1997; 130: 561-69.

  3. Dewey K, Heining M. Differences in morbidity between breast-fed and formula -fed infants. J Pediatr 1995; 126: 696-701.

  4. Katsumi M, Aki U. The maduration and coordination of sucking, swallowing, and respiration in preterm infants. J Pediatr 2003; 142: 36-40.

  5. McCain GC. An evidence-based guideline for introducing oral feeding to healthy preterm infants. Neonatal Netw 2003; 22: 45-50.

  6. Hill AS. Preliminary findings: a maximum oral feeding time for premature infants, the relationship to physiological indicators. Matern Child Nurs J 1992; 20: 81-92.

  7. Shiao SY. Nasogastric tube placement: effects of breathing and sucking in very low-birth-weight infants. Nurs Res 1995; 44: 82-8.

  8. Lau C. Oral feeding in premature infants: advantage of a self-paced milk flow. Acta Paediatr 2000; 89: 453-9.

  9. Lau C. Characterization of the developmental stages of sucking in preterm infants during bottle feeding. Acta Paediatr 2000; 89: 846-52.

  10. Lau C. Infant coordination of suck-swallow and swallow respiration in preterm infants. Acta Paediatr 2003; 92: 721-7.

  11. Pinelli J. No-nutritive sucking for promotion physiologic stability and nutrition in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; CD001071.

  12. Mandich MB. Transition times to oral feeding in premature infants with and without apnea. J Obstel Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 1996; 25: 771-6.

  13. Bazyk S. Factors associated with the transition to oral feeding in infants fed by nasogastric tube. Am J Occup Ther 1990; 44: 1070-8.

  14. Thoyre SM. Developmental transition from gavage to oral feeding in the preterm infant. Annu Rev Nurs Res 2003; 21: 61-92.

  15. Fucile S, Gisel E. Oral stimulation accelerates the transition from tube to oral feeding in preterm infants. J Pediatr 2002; 141: 230-6.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Pediatr. 2005;72