medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Anestesiología

ISSN 3061-8142 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2000, Number 2

Next >>

Rev Mex Anest 2000; 23 (2)

Human Factor as a cause of preoperative information delay

Alonso TJ, Rodríguez SL, Salmerón AAL, García AJP
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 55-59
PDF size: 908.44 Kb.


Key words:

Medical quality care, preoperative laboratory information, clinical laboratory.

ABSTRACT

Background and objectives: Health Department recognizes that the quality of the services offered to the user population is insufficient, and emphasizes the governmental will to motivate and to promote the delivery of the correct services with the acceptable quality. In its research, the goal is expounded to evaluate the duration of time periods involved in the sequence of the services offered by the Clinical Laboratory to the user of the obstetric and gynecological urgency area. Material and Methods: a descriptive survey was conducted to determinate the elapsed time between laboratory samples collection and laboratory report in a gyneco-obstetric emergency room. Each one of the time periods involved in this process was evaluated. Results: the sequence of the services have a mean duration of 275 minutes, 29% of this time corresponding to Period I (laboratory samples and the beginning of the process), 24% corresponding to Period II (sample processing) and 47% corresponding to Period III (data collection). Conclusions: The obstetric patient has special characteristics, such as the tendency to hyperglycemia and another possibilities of pathology as pre-eclampsy, eclampsy, etc. Anesthesiologists must have, in the least possible time, the information contained in the laboratory results. With the incorporation of some strategies to the activities of the clinical laboratory as well as the development of an information culture, will be possible to reduce the delay in laboratory sample collection and information delivery process, because delay in preoperatory information may have serious consequences, ranging from legal responsibilities to case complication.


REFERENCES

  1. Ramírez-Sánchez TJ, Nájera-Aguilar P, Nigenda-López G. Percepción de la calidad de la atención de los servicios de salud en México: perspectiva de los usuarios. Salud Publica Mex 1998;40:3-12.

  2. Pabón Lasso H. Evaluación de los Servicios de Salud. Conceptos, lndicadores, Ejemplos de Análisis Cuantitativo y Cualitativo. Ed. Modelo Prides. Universidad del Valle, Cali Colombia. 1987.

  3. Donabedian A. Investigación en Servicios de Salud. Memoria del seminario llevado a cabo los días 13, 14 y 15 de julio de 1978. Querétaro, México. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología. Secretaría de Salubridad y Asistencia.

  4. Musgrove P. La eficacia en funciòn de los costos y la reforma del sector salud. Salud Publica Mex 1995;37:363-374.

  5. Lee RI, Jones LW. EI concepto de buena atención médica. Clásicos. Salud Pública Mex 1990;32:245-247.

  6. Durán-González LI. La eficiencia en la prestación de servicios de salud. Salud Pública Mex. Supl. 1990;34:46-59.

  7. Méndez Ramírez I, Namihira Guerrero D, Moreno Altamirano L, Sosa de Martinez C. El protocolo de Investigación. Lineamientos para su elaboración y análisis. Editorial Trillas. México. 1993.

  8. Donabedian A. La calidad de la atención médica. México. La Prensa Médica. 1991.

  9. Donabedian A. Los espacios de la salud, Aspectos fundamentales de la organización de la atención médica. Biblioteca de la Salud. 1988.

  10. Kessner D, Kalk C. Singer J. Assessing health care: The case for tracers. New Engl J Med 1973;288:189-194.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Anest. 2000;23