medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Oftalmología

Anales de la Sociedad Mexicana de Oftalmología y Archivos de la Asociación Para Evitar la Ceguera en México
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2009, Number 3

Next >>

Rev Mex Oftalmol 2009; 83 (3)

Procedimientos fotorrefractivos: factores pronósticos para la calidad visual

Gordon-Angelozzi R, Domínguez-Velasco MF, Hernández-Quintela E, Sánchez-Huerta V, Ramón Naranjo-Tackman R
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 9
Page: 127-130
PDF size: 137.71 Kb.


Key words:

LASIK, PRK, keratometry, contrast sensibility, aberrometry.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine the association between the keratometric values of post photorefractive surgery and visual quality from aberrometry and contrast sensibility.
Material and methods: A prospective, longitudinal, observational and descriptive study was performed. A total of 46 eyes from 24 patients underwent photorefractive surgery with LASIK and PRK technique, in whom the subjective refraction, best corrected visual acuity, keratometries, contrast sensibility and aberrometries were measured pre surgery and at first and third months post surgery.
Results: An association between high keratometries post surgery and index degree of coma and mach aberrometries was evidenced, as well a flatter keratometry and the three highest contrast sensibility frequencies.
Conclusion: With higher post surgery keratometries of LASIK and PRK, there is a better visual quality measured by aberrometry and contrast sensibility.


REFERENCES

  1. Saragoussi D, Saragoussi J-J. Lasik, photokéractectomie refractive et qualité de vision: étude des facteurs pronostiques et enquête de satisfaction. J Fr Ophtalmol 2004; 27(7):755-764.

  2. Schallhorn S, Farjo A, Huang D y cols. Wavefront-Guided LASIK for the correction of primary myopia and astigmatism. Ophathalmology 2008; 115:1249-1261.

  3. Alió JL, Piñero DP, Peche AB. Corneal wavefront-guided enhancement for high levels of corneal coma aberration alter laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008; 34:222-231.

  4. Neeracher B, Senn P; Schipper I. Glare sensitivity and optical side effects 1 year after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30:1696-1701

  5. Durrie DS, Slade SG, Marshall J. Wavefront-guided excimer laser ablation using photorefractive keratectomy and sub-bowmans keratomileusis: a contralateral eye study. J Refract Surg 2008; 24:77-84.

  6. Fan-P, Li J, Miller, Sullivan J, Florakis GJ. Night vision disturbances after corneal refractive surgery. Surv Ophthalmol 2002; 47(6):533-546.

  7. Dougherty Paul, Waring III G, Chayed A, Ficsher J y cols. Topographically guided laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia using a customized aspherical treatment zone. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008; 34:1862-1871.

  8. Montés-Micó R; Charman WN. Choice of spatial frequency for contrast sensitivity evaluation after corneal refractive surgery. J Refract Surg 2001; 17:646-651.

  9. Hori-Komai Y, Toda I, Asano-Kato N, Ito M, Yamamoto T, Tsubota K. Comparison of LASIK using the NIDEK EC-5000 optimized aspheric transition zone (OATz) and conventional ablation profile. J Refract Surg 2006; 22:546-555.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Oftalmol. 2009;83