medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirugía y Cirujanos

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2009, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Cir Cir 2009; 77 (3)

Complaint analysis derived from surgical practice

Fajardo-Dolci G, Rodríguez-Suárez FJ, Campos-Castolo EM, Carrillo-Jaimes A, Zavala-Suárez E, Aguirre-Gas HG
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 207-215
PDF size: 106.75 Kb.


Key words:

Medical complaints in surgery, surgical safety.

ABSTRACT

An analysis of medical complaints was presented to the National Commission on Medical Arbitration (Comisión Nacional de Arbitraje Médico, Conamed) between June 1996 and December 2007 to determine its magnitude and to identify the causes of safety problems in medical care. Out of 182,407 complaints presented to Conamed, 87 % were resolved by the Office of Orientation and Management. The remaining 18,443 complaints were presented to the Council Directorate. Of those cases, 48 % were resolved by an agreement between the complaintants and the physicians, 31 % were not resolved by this method, and 3 % were irresolute complaints. The highest frequency of complaints was registered in the Federal District (Distrito Federal) and the State of México (Estado de México), mainly corresponding to social security institutions and private hospitals. Among the nine most frequently involved specialties, six were surgical specialties. Malpractice was identified in 25 % of all cases. The principal demands of those making complaints were the refunding of expenses in patient medical care (51 %) and indemnification (40 %) and, in those, the average amount of payments was 4.6 times greater. Due to the incidence of medical complaints, it was reasonable to investigate the causes and to take preventive and corrective actions required for the decrease of this. It has been proposed to the Mexican Academy of Surgery that this organization should use their educational leadership and assume the vanguard in the dissemination and promotion of the WHO plan “Safe Surgery Saves Lives” and the implementation in Mexico of the “Surgical Safety Checklist.”


REFERENCES

  1. Secretaría de Salud. Ley General de Salud. Diario Oficial de la Federación del 15 de diciembre de 2008. p. 4.

  2. Secretaría de Salud. Programa Nacional de Salud 2001-2006. México: Secretaría de Salud; 2001. pp. 81-114.

  3. Secretaría de Salud. Programa Nacional de Salud 2007-2012. México: Secretaría de Salud; 2007. pp. 83-105.

  4. Secretaría de Salud. Programa Sectorial de Salud 2007-2012. México: Secretaría de Salud; 2007. pp. 13-22.

  5. Aguirre-Gas H. Calidad de la atención médica. Bases para su evaluación y mejoramiento continuo. Tercera edición. México: Conferencia Interamericana de Seguridad Social/Noriega Editores; 2002.

  6. Presidencia de la República. Decreto del 31 de mayo de 1996, por el que se crea la Comisión Nacional de Arbitraje Médico. Diario Oficial de la Federación del 3 de junio de 1996; p. 96. Disponible en http://www.conamed.gob.mx/conocenos/pdf/decreto_creación.pdf

  7. Comisión Nacional de Arbitraje Médico. Programa de Acción, Fortalecimiento e Innovación 2007-2012; 2007. México: Conamed; 2007. p. 5. Disponible en http://conamed.gob.mx/publicaciones/pdf/fortin.pdf

  8. Kohn LT, Corrigan J, Donaldson MS. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.

  9. World Health Organization. The Launch of the World Alliance for Patient Safety. Forward programme. Geneva: WHO Library; 2004.

  10. World Health Organization. Surgical safety checklist. Washington, DC. WHO Library; 2008.

  11. Aguirre-Gas H, Campos-Castolo M, Carrillo-Jaimes A, Zavala-Suárez E, Fajardo-Dolci G. Análisis crítico de las quejas Conamed 1996-2007. Rev Conamed 2008;13:1-16.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Cir. 2009;77