medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Biomédica

Centro de Investigaciones Regionales Dr. Hideyo Noguchi, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2001, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Biomed 2001; 12 (3)

Changes on rumen protozooa population induced by the inclusión of Canavalia ensiformis in cattle diets.

Sandoval-Castro CA, Herrera GF
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 166-171
PDF size: 35.25 Kb.


Key words:

Canavalia ensiformis, rumen protozoa, cattle.

ABSTRACT

Introduction. Canavalia ensiformis is a legume which stands out for its nutritional value. However, it also has several toxic compounds that limits its use. In vitro toxic effect of canavalia upon rumen protozoa has been reported but its in vivo toxicity is unknown. Objective. The objective of the present workt was to assess the changes of the rumen protozoa population when cattle are fed canavalia in their diet. Material and Methods. Four bulls (264.5 Kg live weight) fitted with rumen cannulae were used in a 2x2 crossover design with factorial arrangement. The animals were fed ad libitum with taiwan grass hay and canavalia or sorghum grain as a supplement (c. 27% of diet on dried mead base). Rumen liquour was collected after a 3-week adaptation period and the rumen protozoa were classified and counted. Data was analyzed after log10 transformation using a GLM procedure. Means were compared by the LSD test. Results. An increment was observed (p‹0.05) in the flagella population when the diets included canavalia (106.345 vs 105.247), but holotrics y entodinia were lowered (103.717 vs 104.364 y 104.407 vs 104.933 respectively p<0.05). The total protozoa numbers were higher with canavalia if flagella were included (106.369 vs 105.575) and lower if flagella were excluded (104.505 vs 105.093) (p‹0.05). Discussion. Changes in the protozoa population were an adaptative response to canavalia intake. Different protozoa groups seem to have different abilities to adapt/ and/or respond to the canavalia toxics.


REFERENCES

  1. Belmar R, Ellis N. El efecto de diferentes tratamientos sobre el valor nutritivo de las semillas de canavalia ensiformis. En: Alternativas y valor nutritivo de algunos recursos alimenticios destinados a producción. Informe Provisional No. 16. Fundación Internacional para la Ciencia; 1985. p. 139-46.

  2. Belmar R, Nava-Montero R, Sandoval-Castro C, McNab JM. Jack bean (Canavalia ensiformis L. DC) in poultry diets: Antinutritional factors and detoxification studies- a review. World’s Poultry Sci J 1999; 55:37-59.

  3. Camacho D, Escobar A, Parra R. Efecto del tamaño de partículas del pericarpio y del nivel de grano de canavalia ensiformis sobre el consumo y la digestibilidad. Informe anual IPA 1985/1986. Universidad Central de Venezuela;1987. p. 41-2.

  4. González A, Escobar A. Uso de la canavalia en becerros predestete. II. Alimentación a base de planta integral de yuca. Informe anual IPA 1987. Universidad Central de Venezuela; 1989. p. 44-5.

  5. Paredes L, Escobar A, Fernandez L. Efecto del nivel de suplementación con canavalia sobre el crecimiento de becerros. Informe anual IPA 1985/1986. Universidad Central de Venezuela. 1987; p. 34-5.

  6. Mora M, Combellas J, Parra O. Complementariedad de sustratos entre harina de grano de canavalia y urea. Informe anual IPA 1988/1989. Universidad Central de Venezuela; 1990. p. 51-2.

  7. Váquez W, Silva EJ, Combellas J, Escobar A. Evaluación de la harina de grano de canavalia y harina de pescado como suplementos proteicos en raciones para becerros postdestete. Informe anual IPA 1985/1986. Universidad Central de Venezuela; 1987. p. 36-7.

  8. Silva EJ, Vásquez W, Combellas J, Escobar A. Comparación de dos formas de suministro de grano de canavalia con y sin suplementación de harina de canavalia con y sin suplementación de harina de pescado en raciones para becerros. Informe anual IPA 1985/1986. Universidad Central de Venezuela; 1987. p. 38-9.

  9. Domínguez-Bello MG, Stewart C. Effects of feeding Canavalia ensiformis on the rumen flora of sheep, and of the toxic amino acid canavanine on rumen bacteria. System Appl Microbiol 1990; 13: 388-93.

  10. Herrera F, Godoy R. El uso de la Canavalia ensiformis en la alimentación de rumiantes. En: Memorias 1a. Reunión sobre Producción Animal Tropical. Cárdenas, Tabasco, Julio. CEICAFAS/FMVZ-UADY/Col. Postgraduados. 1989. S/p.

  11. Mora M, Domínguez MG, Escobar A. Uso de la canavalia ensiformis en la alimentación de rumiantes. En: Seminario-taller de trabajo sobre Canavalia ensiformis. Maracay Venezuela. 1991. S/p.

  12. Demeyer DI. Rumen microbes and digestion of plant cell walls. Agric Environ 1981; 6:295-337

  13. ARC (Agricultural Research Coulcil). The nutrient requirements of ruminant livestock. Farnham Royal, Slough U.K.: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux; 1980.

  14. Ogimoto K, Imai S. Atlas of rumen microbiology. Tokyo:Japan Scientific Societies Press; 1981.

  15. Minitab, statistical software release 12. Minitab Inc. State College, PA. USA. 1998.

  16. Díaz A, Avendaño M, Escobar A. Use of tropical plants as defaunating agents and its effects on animal metabolism. En: Dual purpose cattle research. Anderson S, Wadsworth J, editores. Proceedings of an international workshop, March 1992, Mérida, México. IFS/FMVZ-UADY; 1995. p. 273-80.

  17. Rosales M, Laredo M, Cuesta A, Anzola H, Hernández L. The use of forage tree leaves to control protozoa population in the rumen. En: Dual purpose cattle research. Anderson S, Wadsworth J, editores. Proceedings of an international workshop, March 1992, Mérida, México. IFS/FMVZ-UADY; 1995. p. 281-8.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Biomed. 2001;12