medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Salud Mental

ISSN 0185-3325 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2009, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Salud Mental 2009; 32 (3)

Efecto de una intervención psicoeducativa para disminuir el Síndrome Burnout en personal de confianza de la Comisión Federal de Electricidad

Cabrera PCE, Ruiz CLK, González PGJ, Vega LMG, Valadez FI
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 67
Page: 215-221
PDF size: 123.75 Kb.


Key words:

Burnout Syndrome, psycho-educative intervention, labour stress.

ABSTRACT

Modern life imposes several different labor demands on human beings; thus, bringing about stressing situations. All those events perceived as threatening bringing about tension are called stressors. A stressing situation comes about when there exists a discrepancy between environment demands and adequate resources to cope with them. All these factors lead to physiological, cognitive and motor responses which enhance perception and create the need of better solutions to allow appropriate adaptation behaviors. When stress is present at the workplace in a recurrent fashion, it is known as Labor Stress (LS), an alarming circumstance affecting individuals and organizations. Main causes of LS are: physical conditions, schedule, work position, interpersonal relations and other organizational variables. Labor Stress is a public health and a labor health problem, for it is related to an increase in labor accident, morbidity and absenteeism rates; thus, generating negative attitudes that yield economic loss to institutions. The Burnout Syndrome (BS) is a response to chronically labor stress manifested through emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, as well as hostile and aggressive attitudes toward workmates and service users, resulting in a feeling of poor personal development. Objective Assess the effect of a psycho-educative intervention to decrease BS in managing or directive employees from one sector of CFE Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico. Materials and methodology A quasi-experimental study was carried out; this included measurements prior and after educative intervention carried out on confidence employees from CFE Guadalajara from February through September 2005. The study sample was made up of 29 managing or directive employees, conforming four groups; one random-selected group received educative intervention; the other three were control groups; different questionnaires were applied: personal data, psycho-social factors and BS through the Maslach Burnout Inventory Scale (MBI). From a participative-educational view point, encouraged by the Pan-American Health Organization (PHO), the educative intervention sought health promotion through the betterment and consistency of mental and physical wellbeing. All BS concepts as well as psychological factors were analyzed. Other workshop included the development of preventing, coping and treatment strategies at individual and social levels. Finally, a corrective program directed to decreasing psychological risk factors in the organization was encouraged. Also, a post-intervention assessment was applied. Results Subjects had an average age of 31.5 ± 6.8 years; 52% were females; group 1 decreased for all indicators; emotional exhaustion from 71% to 29%; depersonalization from 43% to 14%; lack of personal development from 57% to 14%. However, no significant difference was found in both groups by sex. Discussion In personnel with specific responsibilities, obligations, opportunities, challenges and rewards based on their performance work environment often drives them to frustration and despair. When the employee believes that gives more than he receives, he becomes emotionally exhausted and more even if he do not have the resources to cope with the prospect of work. Also, it is documented that at younger age there is an increased risk of presenting the Burnout. This is because interpersonal relationships are more contentious because of the lack of experience in management. In the series reported, on both groups we were not able to document this relationship, but still, there is a lack of an international consensus to recognize this as a risk factor. Mingote describes that when the employee has less than five years working, they are often idealistic, utopian dreamers, unlike those with more than ten years in the job and are in risk of experiencing monotony at work, loss of interest and the downgrade. Also, this type of workers is subject to overtime. This excess produces physical and mental stress and leads to lower feelings of personal accomplishment. Even though there could be resources for coping with the monotony at work and that provides resources for better interpersonal communication and support networks at work.If the worker feels happy with the work carried out, and feels as an autonomous decision maker able to practice his skills, then he will have the protective factors to cope with the Syndrome of Burnout at work and it is unlikely that he will found in his work a monotonous and a routine activity with little opportunity to practice their skills. The emotional exhaustion related to fatigue and tiredness are caused by excessive wear at work and very demanding work environments with little autonomy and control of work situations. Depletion causes difficulties with daily responsibilities, these factors are related to the work system and the social interactions in the workplace, which after the educative intervention modifies the emotional exhaustion level in the experimental group (29% of group). The depersonalization causes people to be treated as objects (coldness and insensitivity) causing the worker indifference and little empathy with the task of work. Although the level of depersonalization was low in the groups, it decreased in the experimental group, which may be caused by the coping mechanisms embedded in the educational intervention. The lack of personal accomplishment includes the limitations to understand the feelings and emotions of fellow workers and also have a positive influence for them to create pleasant environments (these completion rates increased in the intervention group). In developing countries, there is now general agreement on the importance of the behaviors and lifestyles in the generation of health problems as well as the importance of early healthy lifestyles. All countries have agreed to launch health and educational programs to prevent the modification of human behavior. This study provides a useful educational methodology that responds to how to bring workers to participate in their care, as well as a significant contribution to addressing a problem of thi s magnitude and importance to public health and health services in Latin America. Conclusion The psycho-educative program sensitized employees when developing strategies to decrease and control labor stressors that affects them, the same stressors that bring about BS.


REFERENCES

  1. Sandín B. El estrés: un análisis basado en el papel de los factores sociales.

  2. Internacional J Clinical Health Psychology 2003;3(1):141-157.

  3. López-Lorente R. Síndrome de Burnout en el personal sanitario. Instrumento

  4. de medida. Medicina Paliativa 2000;7(3):94-100.

  5. López-Morales A, González Velásquez F, Morales Guzmán M, Espinoza

  6. Martínez C. Síndrome de Burnout en residentes con jornada laborales

  7. prolongadas. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 2007;45(3):233-242.

  8. Díaz-Romero R, Lartigue-Becerra T, Acosta-Velasco ME. Sindrome de

  9. Burnout. Desgaste emocional en cirujanos dentistas. Rev ADM

  10. 2001;58(2):63-67.

  11. Matteson MT, Ivancevich JM. Controlling work stress: Effective human

  12. resource and management strategies. Academy Management Review

  13. 1989;14(3):460-462.

  14. Gil Monte PR. Validez factorial de la adaptación al español del Maslach

  15. Burnout Inventory. Salud Publica Mex 2002;44(1):33-40.

  16. Atance-Martinez JC. Aspectos epidemiológicos del síndrome Burnout

  17. en el personal sanitario. Rev Esp Salud Pública 1997;71(3):293-303.

  18. Anderson M, Iwanicki E. Teacher motivation and relationship to burnout.

  19. Educational Administration Quarterly 1984;20(2):109-132.

  20. Yperen N, Buunk B, Schaufeli W. Comunal orientation and the burnout

  21. síndrome among nurses. J Applied Social Psychology 1992;22:173-18.

  22. Mingote C. Sindrome de Burnout o desgaste professional. Formación

  23. Medica Continuada 1998;5(8):493-508.

  24. Hershowitz R. Education and behavior in diabetes care. Diabetic Medicine

  25. 1990;7:633.

  26. Ko GT, Wu MM, Tang WHP, Chan CH, Chen R. Body mass index profile

  27. in Hong Kong Chinesse adults. Ann Acad Med Singapore

  28. 2001;30:393-6.

  29. Guerrero-Barona E, Rubio-Jimenez JC. Estrategias de prevención e intervención

  30. del «Burnout» en el ámbito educativo. Salud Mental

  31. 2005;28(5):27-33.

  32. Lai SW, Li TC. Body mass index and its related factors in the elderly.

  33. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2001;30:397-400.

  34. Van Der Sande MA, Walraven GE, Milligan PJ, Banya WA, Ceesay SM.

  35. Family history: an opportunity for early intervention. Bull World Health

  36. Organ 2001;79:321-8.

  37. Steckler A, Allegrante JP, Altman D. Health education intervention strategies.

  38. Health Educ Q 1995;22:307-28.

  39. Turnin MC, Bourgeois O, Cathelineau G, Leguerrier AM, Halami Set al.

  40. Multicenter randomized evaluation of a nutritional education software

  41. in obese patients. Diabetes Metabolism 2001;27:139-47.

  42. Organización Panamericana de la Salud, OPS. Promoción de la salud.

  43. OPS No 557, 1996.

  44. Jenkins D. Mejoremos la salud a todas las edades: Manual para el cambio

  45. de comportamiento. OPS No 590, 2005.

  46. Hernandez Sampieri R. Metodología de la investigación. Mac Graw Hill.

  47. Cuarta edición; 2006.

  48. Sandín B. El estrés: un análisis basado en el papel de los factores sociales. Internacional J Clinical Health Psychology 2003;3(1):141-157.

  49. López-Lorente R. Síndrome de Burnout en el personal sanitario. Instrumento de medida. Medicina Paliativa 2000;7(3):94-100.

  50. López-Morales A, González Velásquez F, Morales Guzmán M, Espinoza Martínez C. Síndrome de Burnout en residentes con jornada laborales prolongadas. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 2007;45(3):233-242.

  51. Díaz-Romero R, Lartigue-Becerra T, Acosta-Velasco ME. Sindrome de Burnout. Desgaste emocional en cirujanos dentistas. Rev ADM 2001;58(2):63-67.

  52. Matteson MT, Ivancevich JM. Controlling work stress: Effective human resource and management strategies. Academy Management Review 1989;14(3):460-462.

  53. Gil Monte PR. Validez factorial de la adaptación al español del Maslach Burnout Inventory. Salud Publica Mex 2002;44(1):33-40.

  54. Atance-Martinez JC. Aspectos epidemiológicos del síndrome Burnout en el personal sanitario. Rev Esp Salud Pública 1997;71(3):293-303.

  55. Anderson M, Iwanicki E. Teacher motivation and relationship to burnout. Educational Administration Quarterly 1984;20(2):109-132.

  56. Yperen N, Buunk B, Schaufeli W. Comunal orientation and the burnout síndrome among nurses. J Applied Social Psychology 1992;22:173-18.

  57. Mingote C. Sindrome de Burnout o desgaste professional. Formación Medica Continuada 1998;5(8):493-508.

  58. Hershowitz R. Education and behavior in diabetes care. Diabetic Medicine 1990;7:633.

  59. Ko GT, Wu MM, Tang WHP, Chan CH, Chen R. Body mass index profile in Hong Kong Chinesse adults. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2001;30:393-6.

  60. Guerrero-Barona E, Rubio-Jimenez JC. Estrategias de prevención e intervención del «Burnout» en el ámbito educativo. Salud Mental 2005;28(5):27-33.

  61. Lai SW, Li TC. Body mass index and its related factors in the elderly. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2001;30:397-400.

  62. Van Der Sande MA, Walraven GE, Milligan PJ, Banya WA, Ceesay SM. Family history: an opportunity for early intervention. Bull World Health Organ 2001;79:321-8.

  63. Steckler A, Allegrante JP, Altman D. Health education intervention strategies. Health Educ Q 1995;22:307-28.

  64. Turnin MC, Bourgeois O, Cathelineau G, Leguerrier AM, Halami Set al. Multicenter randomized evaluation of a nutritional education software in obese patients. Diabetes Metabolism 2001;27:139-47.

  65. Organización Panamericana de la Salud, OPS. Promoción de la salud. OPS No 557, 1996.

  66. Jenkins D. Mejoremos la salud a todas las edades: Manual para el cambio de comportamiento. OPS No 590, 2005.

  67. Hernandez Sampieri R. Metodología de la investigación. Mac Graw Hill. Cuarta edición; 2006.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Salud Mental. 2009;32