medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Coloproctología Enfermedades del Ano, Recto y Colon

Revista Mexicana de Coloproctología Enfermedades del Ano, Recto y Colon
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2009, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Coloproctol 2009; 15 (1)

Controversies in the treatment of perianal abscesses and fistulas: Our experience

Palmieri NP, Gavosto S, Pigatto J, Serra F
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 6
Page: 9-12
PDF size: 34.5 Kb.


Key words:

Perianal abscesses, perianal fistulas.

ABSTRACT

History: The perianal abscesses and fistulas represent one of the most frequent coloproctological pathologies. The experience of our hospital is retrospectively analyzed in order to show the pathology incidence and to evaluate the results. Method: 194 abscesses and fistulas interventions were analyzed between January 2000 and March 2007. 150 abscesses and 44 fistulas were treated. The immunosuppressant conditions, surgical history and utilization of complementary methods were taken into account. Procedures: Abscesses: simple drainages and drainage plus fistulotomy. Fistulas: fistulotomy with seton, partial fistulotomy plus fistulotomy with seton and fistulotomy plus mucosal descent. Results: Except in 3 of them, etiology was unspecific in every patient. From the 150 patients that were intervened for abscesses, 120 underwent simple drainage and 30 drainage plus fistulotomy. 24 recidivated. From the 44 fistulas cases, 6 were complex. Treatment: fistulotomy with seton (30), fistulectomy (8), partial fistulectomy plus fistulotomy with seton (10), fistulectomy plus mucosal descent (2). 50% presented perianal abscess history. Conclusions: In abscesses, simple drainage and primary fistulotomy showed low index of fistulas formation. 50% of the treated patients for perianal fistula had abscess history. On fistulas, the preferred treatment was the fistulotomy with low recidivism rate.


REFERENCES

  1. Arnous J, Denis J. du Puy-montbrun Th: Les suppurations anales et perianales (á prpos de 6,500 cas). Con Med 1990; 102: 1715-19.

  2. Gallagher DM. Applied anatomy of the anal canal and rectum. Surg Clin N Am 1964; 44: 1297-1300.

  3. Hamalainen K, Sainio P. Incidente of fistulas alter drainage of acute anorectal abscesses. Dis Colon Rectum 1998; 41(11): 1357-62.

  4. Graciano A. Diagnóstico y tratamiento de las afecciones anales benignas. Relato oficial al LXXV Congreso Argentino de Cirugía. Rev Argent Cirug Número extraordinario 2004: 53-54.

  5. Kronborg O. Tol ay open or excise a fistula-in-ano: a randomized trial. Br J Surg 1985; 72: 970.

  6. Abcarian H. The lay open technique. In: Philips RSK, Lunniss PJ. Anal Fistula Chapman and Hall medical. London 1996: 73-79.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Coloproctol. 2009;15