medigraphic.com
ISSN 2007-3178 (Print)
Asociación Mexicana de Cirugía Bucal y Maxilofacial, Colegio Mexicano de Cirugía Bucal y Maxilofacial, A.C.

2009, Number 2

Next >>

Rev Mex Cir Bucal Maxilofac 2009; 5 (2)

Satisfaction grade in postoperative patients of orthognathic surgery

Estrada ARB, Liceaga RR

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 47-51
PDF size: 113.05 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The intention to realize this study was to know the degree satisfaction that has the patients who have been taken part surgically of orthognathic surgery in the Juárez Hospital of Mexico in different post-operative stages, as well as to measure the acceptance degree before their as much familiar social surroundings as in the work, and since this has hit in its personality. It is clinical, descriptive, observational, and no experimental a study. The study was realized in 23 patients who operated of orthognathic surgery. The satisfaction degree that the patients had in average the surgery subsequent to was of 91.17%. The realized surgeries caused 78.25% of positive impact in the treatment towards the patient on the part of their family, and 70.65% of positive impact in their labor or scholastic surroundings. They acquired but confidence in itself in 89.12%. The patients improved their interpersonal relations in 68.47%. Was a high degree of post-operative satisfaction in patients submissive ortognatic surgery and the different stages from its recovery increase the satisfaction degree.


REFERENCES

  1. Bell WH. Modern practice in orthognathic and recostructive surgery, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Saunders Company 1992; I: 2-17.

  2. Gregoret J. Ortodoncia y cirugía ortognática, Barcelona, Expaxs; 2000: 277-279.

  3. Raspall G. Cirugía maxilofacial. Madrid España, Médica Panamericana 1997: 191-194.

  4. Balwin DC. Appearance and esthetics in oral health. Community Dental Oral Epid 1980; 8: 244-256.

  5. Bell WH. Surgical corrections of dentofacial deformities. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1980.

  6. Epker BN, Fish LC. Dentofacial deformities: integrated orthodontic and surgical correction. St Louis, CV Mosby; 1986.

  7. Epker BN et al. Cosmetic Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: Oral and Maxillofac Surg Clin of NA 1990; 2: 217-437.

  8. González J. Modificación del perfil facial en pacientes sometidos a cirugía ortognática. Tesis Doctoral. Barcelona, 1994.

  9. Legan HL, Burstone CJ. Soft tissue cephalometric analysis for orthognatic surgery. J Oral Surg 1980; 38: 744-751.

  10. McNamara JA. A method of cephalometric evaluation. Amer J Orthod 1984; 86: 449-469.

  11. Proffit WR, White RP. Surgical Orthodontic treatment. St Louis, CV Mosby; 1991.

  12. Rakosi T. An atlas and manual of cephalometric radiology. Londres, Wolfe; 1978.

  13. Rees TD. Esthetic plastic surgery. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1980.

  14. Rickets. Divine proportion in facial aesthetics. Clin Plast Surg 1982; 9: 401-415.

  15. Vilar MT. Armonía facial a partir de una telerradiografía lateral de cráneo: Ortod Esp 1986; 29: 41-46.

  16. Wolfe A. Berkowitz S. Plastic Surgery of the facial skeleton. Boston: Little Brown and Co; 1989.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com