López SML, Montoya CMR, Cárdenas MA, Guaman RH, Castilla CH

Language: Spanish
References: 9
Page: 79-84
PDF size: 269.57 Kb.

ABSTRACT

The importance of the multidisciplinary treatment of patients with hemifacial microsomia slant, the early treatment, guide of eruption and the use orthopedics maxillary pre and post surgery, as well as the use of osteogenic distraction offer the ideal treatment in patients with hemifacial microsomia.

REFERENCES

1. Converse JM, Coccaro PJ, Becker M, Wood-Smith D. On hemifacial microsomia: the first and second branchial arch syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg 1973; 51: 268-279.

2. Cohen MM Jr. A critique of the OMENS classification of hemifacial microsomia. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1991; 28: 77.

3. McCarthy JG, Schreiber J, Karp N, Thorne CH, Grayson BH. Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 89: 1-8.

4. Molina F, Ortiz Monasterio F. Mandibular elongation and remodeling by distraction: a farewell to major osteotomies. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 96: 825-842.

5. Ilizarov GA. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues I: the influence of stability of fixation and soft-tissue preservation. Clin Orthop 1989; 238: 249-281.

6. Ilizarov GA. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues, II: the influence of the rate and frequency of distraction. Clin Orthop 1989; 239: 263-285.

7. Alexander J. Gougoutas, Davinder J. Singh, hemifacial microsomia. PRS Journal 2007.

8. Gorlin RJ, Cohen MM, Hennekam RCM. Syndromes of the Head and Neck. New York, 2001: 790–798.

9. Converse JM, McCarthy JG, Coccaro PJ et al. Clinical aspects of craniofacial microsomia. Plastic Reconstructive Surgery. In: JM Converse, JG McCarthy, and D Wood-Smith 1972.