medigraphic.com
ISSN 1665-2576 (Print)

2009, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Cir Endoscop 2009; 10 (2)

Evolution and current condition of inguinal plasty through the laparoscopic approach

López CJA, Guzmán CF, Ortega PF, Villarreal G, Valenzuela L, Velíz MF

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 89-91
PDF size: 70.62 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Laparoscopic hernioplasty has demonstrated good results if the principles of the appropriate learning curve such as being familiarized with the anatomy of the inguinal region, receiving proctorship in the first procedures, proper selection of the patients and others are followed. In this review, the authors mention the main advantages of laparoscopic hernia repair, analyzing the cost and the advantages of faster return to work in the public institution in which they work.


REFERENCES

  1. López CJA, Guzmán CF, Jaramillo DTEJ, Covarrubias HMA. Plastia inguinal con abordaje laparoscópico TAPP vs TEP. Cir Gen 2005; 27: 263-268.

  2. López CJA, Guzmán CF, Martínez GA. Curva de aprendizaje en plastia inguinal laparoscópica ¿Cómo superarla? Cir Gen 2003; 25: 291-294.

  3. Voitk AJ. The learning curve in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair for the community general surgeon. Can J Surg 1998; 41: 446-50.

  4. Lau H, Patil NG, Yuen WK, Lee F. Learning curve for unilateral endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernioplasty. Surg Endosc 2002; 16: 1724-8.

  5. Memon MA, Cooper NJ, Memon B, Memon MI, Abrams KR. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 2003; 90(12): 1479-92.

  6. Edwards CC 2nd, Bailey RW. Laparoscopic hernia repair: the learning curve. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2000; 10(3): 149-53.

  7. Lowham AS, Filipi CJ, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Stoppa R, Wantz GE, Felix EL, Crafton WB. Mechanisms of hernia recurrence after preperitoneal mesh repair. Traditional and laparoscopic. Ann Surg 1997; 225(4): 422-31.

  8. Congreso Mundial de Hernias. Asociación Mexicana de Cirugía Laparoscópica Guadalajara, Jalisco. Febrero de 1998.

  9. O’Dwyer PJ. Current status of the debate on laparoscopic hernia repair. Br Med Bull 2004; 70: 105-18.

  10. Mayagoitia GJC. Hernia de la pared abdominal. Tratamiento actual. Ed. Alfil, 2a. Edición, México, D.F. 2009.

  11. Heikkinen TJ, Haukipuro K, Koivukangas P, Hulkko A. A prospective randomized outcome and cost comparison of totally extraperitoneal endoscopic hernioplasty versus Lichtenstein hernia operation among employed patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc1998; 8: 338-344.

  12. Kuhry E, van Veen RN, Langeveld HR, Steyerberg EW, Jeekel J, Bonjer HJ. Open or endoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair? A Systematic Review. Surg Endosc 2007; 21(2): 161-6.

  13. Díaz EJA, González RR, Cantú GFJ, Villegas CO. Estudio comparativo de hernioplastia laparoscópica TAPP vs técnica abierta con malla vs técnica abierta convencional. Avances 2005; 3(5): 10-14.

  14. López CJA, Guzmán CF, Ortiz LA. Plastia inguinal laparoscópica. Estado actual y perspectivas. ¡Cómo enseñar a realizarla! Rev Mex Cir Endoscop 2001; 2(2): 71-74.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com