medigraphic.com
ISSN 2594-1518 (Electronic)
ISSN 1405-0099 (Print)

2010, Number s1

<< Back Next >>

Cir Gen 2010; 32 (s1)

Simulación: ¿Qué se ha probado y qué no?

Dávila-Cervantes A

Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 49-51
PDF size: 32.35 Kb.


Text Extraction




REFERENCES

  1. Satava RM. Virtual reality surgical simulator: the first steps. Surg Endosc 1993; 7: 203-205.

  2. Gurusamy KS, Aggarwal R, Palanivelu L, Davidson BR. Virtual reality training for surgical trainees in laparoscopic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; 21: CD006575.

  3. Gurusamy KS, Aggarwal R, Palanivelu L, Davidson BR. Systematic review of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of virtual reality training for laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 1088-97.

  4. Larsen CR, Soerensen JL, Grantcharov TP, Dalsgaard T, Schouenborg L, Ottosen C, Schroeder TV, Ottesen BS. Effect of virtual reality training on laparoscopic surgery: randomized controlled trial. BMJ 2009; 14:338: b 1802.

  5. Botden SM, Jakimowicz JJ. What is going on in augmented reality simulation in laparoscopic surgery? Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 1693-700.

  6. Botden SM, Buzink SN, Schijven MP, Jakimowicz JJ. Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulator: what is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSIM virtual reality laparoscopic simulator. World J Surg 2007; 31: 764-72.

  7. Narula VK, Watson WC, Davis SS, Hinshaw K, Needleman BJ, Mikami DJ, Hazey JW, Winston JH, Muscarella P, Rubin M, Patel V, Melvin WS. A computerized analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic task performance. Surg Endosc 2007; 21: 2258–226.

  8. Broe D, Ridgway PF, Johnson S, Tierney S, Conlon KC. Construct validation of a novel hybrid surgical simulator. Surg Endosc 2006; 20: 900–904.

  9. Ritter EM, Kindeland TW, Michael C, Pimentel EA, Bowyer MW. Concurrent validity of augmented reality metrics applied to the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS). Surg Endosc 2007; 21: 1441–1445.

  10. Sickle Van KR. Construct validation of the ProMIS simulator using a novel laparoscopic suturing task. Surg Endosc 2005; 19: 1227–1231.

  11. Botden SM, Buzink SN, Schijven MP, Jakimowicz JJ. ProMIS augmented reality training of laparoscopic procedures face validity. Simul Health 2008; 3: 97-102.

  12. Chang L, Petros J, Hess DT, Rotondi C, Babineau TJ. Integrating simulation into a surgical residency program: Is voluntary participation effective? Surg Endosc 2007; 21: 418–421.

  13. Botden SM, de Hingh IH, Jakimowicz JJ. Suturing training in augmented reality: Gaining proficiency in suturing skills faster. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 2131-7.

  14. Botden SM, de Hingh IH, Jakimowicz JJ. Meaningful assessment method for laparoscopic suturing training in augmented reality. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 2221-8.

  15. Maithel S, Sierra R, Korndorffer J, Neumann P, Dwason S, Jones D, Scott D. Construct and face validity of MIST-VR, Endotower, and CELTS: are we ready for skills assessment using simulators? Surg Endosc 2006; 20: 104–112.

  16. Maithel SK, Villegas L, Stypolous N, Dawson S, Jones DB. Simulated laparoscopy using a head-mounted display vs traditional video monitor: An assessment of performance and muscle fatigue. Surg Endosc 2005; 19: 406–411.

  17. Stylopoulos N, Cotin S, Maithel SK, Ottensmeyer M, Jackson PG, Bardsley RS, Neumann PF, Rattner DW, Dawson SL. Computer-enhanced laparoscopic training system (CELTS): bridging the gap. Surg Endosc 2004; 18: 782–789.

  18. Stylopoulos N, Cotin S, Dawson S, Ottensmyer M, Neumann P, Bardsley R, Russel M, Jackson P, Rattner D. CELTS: A clinically-based computer enhanced laparoscopic training system. Stud Health Technol Inform 2003; 94: 336–342.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com