Entrar/Registro  
HOME SPANISH
 
Cirugía y Cirujanos
   
MENU

Contents by Year, Volume and Issue

Table of Contents

General Information

Instructions for Authors

Message to Editor

Editorial Board






>Journals >Cirugía y Cirujanos >Year 2009, Issue 6


Correa-Rovelo JM, Téllez-Reynoso O, Obregón-Casanueva L, Morán-Villota S, Duque-López X, García-Osogobio S
Mucosectomía rectal con engrapadora sola y combinada con otros procedimientos quirúrgicos anorrectales. Análisis multivariado de los factores que afectan el resultado clínico
Cir Cir 2009; 77 (6)

Language: Español
References: 27
Page: 461-467
PDF: 87.45 Kb.

[Full text - PDF]

ABSTRACT

Background: We undertook this study to compare the clinical outcome of stapled rectal mucosectomy (SRM) alone and in combination with sphincterotomy and resection of external components and to determine the influence of factors related to complications and patient satisfaction. Methods: Patients with second- to fourth-degree hemorrhoids who underwent SRM alone or in combination with other anorectal procedures were included. Postoperative complications, symptom resolution and patient satisfaction were analyzed. Results: Two hundred forty one patients with a minimum follow-up of 1 year were divided into three groups: SRM alone (n = 187), SRM combined with sphincterotomy (n = 31) and SRM combined with external component resection (n = 23). Patients with SRM with sphincterotomy showed a higher complication rate than the other groups (32 vs. 12.8% and 13%, respectively, p = 0.02). SRM combined with sphincterotomy was associated with a higher rate of complications (OR = 3.5; 95% CI = 1.4-8.7). SRM alone with low mucosal resection was associated with a lower complications rate (OR = 0.4, 95% CI = 0.2-0.8). Resolution of preoperative symptoms was ›80% among the three groups. There was no association between complications and type of procedure with satisfaction level. Resolution of symptoms ‹80% was associated with low/intermediate level of satisfaction (p ‹0.001). Conclusions: Resolution of preoperative symptoms is similar among the three groups. SRM combined with sphincterotomy has a higher risk of complications. The satisfaction level is associated with resolution of preoperative symptoms.


Key words: Stapled rectal mucosectomy, sphincterotomy, external component resection.


REFERENCES

  1. Loder PB, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ, Phillips RK. Haemorrhoids: pathology,pathophysiology and etiology. Br J Surg 1994;81:946-954.

  2. Hass PA, GP, Schmattz S, Fox TA Jr. The prevalence of hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:435-439.

  3. Longo A. Treatment of hemorrhoid disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. In: Sixth World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery; June 3-6,1998. Rome, Italy.

  4. Mehigan BJ, Monson JR, Hartley JE. Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised control trial. Lancet 2000;355:782-785.

  5. Rowsell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM. Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomized control trial. Lancet 2000;355:779-781.

  6. Ho YH, Cheong WK, Tsang C, Ho J, Eu KW, Tang CL, et al. Stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Cost and effectiveness. Randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:1666-1675.

  7. Ganio E, Altomare DF, Gabrielli F, Milito G, Canuti S. Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2001;88:669-674.

  8. Shalaby R, Desoky A. Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan- Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2001;88:1049-1053.

  9. Correa-Rovelo JM, Téllez O, Obregón L, Miranda-Gómez A, Morán S.Stapled rectal mucosectomy vs. closed hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:1367-1375.

  10. Sutherland LM, Burchard AK, Matsuda K, Sweeney JL, Bokey EL, Childs PA, et al. A systematic review of stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Arch Surg 2002;137:1395-1406.

  11. 11.Au-Yong I, Rowsell M, Hemingway DM. Randomised controlled clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidectomy versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: a three and a half year follow up. Colorect Dis 2003;6:37-38.

  12. Smyth EF, Baker RP, Wilken BJ, Hartley JE, White TJ, Monson JR. Stapled versus excision haemorrhoidectomy: long-term follow up of a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2003;361:1437-1438.

  13. Correa-Rovelo JM, Téllez O, Morán S, Bahena-Aponte JA, Moreno CA. Mucosectomía rectal con engrapadora para el tratamiento quirúrgico de la enfermedad hemorroidal: estudio prospectivo de 160 pacientes. Rev Gastroenterol Mex 2006;71:422-427.

  14. Altomare DF, Rinaldi M, Sallustio PL, Martino P, De Fazio M, Memeo V. Long-term effects of stapled haemorrhoidectomy on internal anal function and sensitivity. Br J Surg 2001;88:1487-1491.

  15. Correa-Rovelo JM, Téllez O, Obregón L, Duque-López X, Miranda-Gómez A, Pichardo-Bahena R, et al. Prospective study of factors affecting postoperative pain and symptom persistence after stapled rectal mucosectomy for hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:955-962.

  16. Cheetham MJ, Mortensen NJ, Nystrom PO, Kamm MA, Phillips RK. Persistent pain and fecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 2000;356:730-733.

  17. Molloy RG, Kingsmore D. Life threatening pelvic sepsis after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 2000;355:810.

  18. Rippetti V, Caricato M, Arullani A. Rectal perforation, retropneumoperitoneum, and pneumomediastinum after stapling procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids: report of a case and subsequent considerations. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45;268-270.

  19. Ravo B, Amato A, Bianco V, Boccasanta P, Bottini C, Carriero A, et al. Complications after stapled hemorrhoidectomy: can they be prevented? Tech Coloproctol 2002;6:83-88.

  20. Leong AF, Husain MJ, Seow-Choen F, Goh HS. Performing internal sphincterotomy with other anorectal procedures. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:1130-1132.

  21. Galizia G, Lieto E, Castellano P, Pelosio L, Imperatore V, Pignatelli C. Lateral internal sphincterotomy together with haemorrhoidectomy for treatment of haemorrhoids: a randomized prospective study. Eur J Surg 2000;166:223-228.

  22. Kanellos I, Zacharakis E, Christoforidis E, Angelopoulos S, Kanellos D, Pramateftakis MG, et al. Usefulness of lateral internal sphincterotomy in reducing postoperative pain after open hemorrhoidectomy. World J Surg 2005;29:464-468.

  23. Singer MA, Cintron JR, Fleshman JW, Chaudhry V, Birnbaum EH, Read TE, et al. Early experience with stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the United States. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:360-369.

  24. Kanellos I, Angelopoulos S, Zacharakis E, et al. Stapled haemorrhoidopexy for haemorrhoids in combination with lateral sphincterotomy for fissurein- ano. Eur Surg Res 2005;37:317-320.

  25. Pigot F, Dao-Quang M, Castinel A, Juguet F, Bouchard D, Bockle J, et al. Low hemorrhoidopexy staple line does not improve results and increases risk for incontinence. Tech Coloproctol 2006;10:329-333.

  26. Kam MH, Mathur P, Peng XH, Seow-Choen F, Chew IW, Kumarasinghe MP. Correlation of histology with anorectal function following stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:1437-1441.

  27. García-Aguilar J, Belmonte C, Wong WD, Lowry AC, Madoff RD. Open vs. closed sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure: long term results. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:440-443.






>Journals >Cirugía y Cirujanos >Year 2009, Issue 6
 

· Journal Index 
· Links 
       
Copyright 2010