medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Salud Mental

Órgano Oficial del Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Authors instructions        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2010, Number 4

Salud Mental 2010; 33 (4)

Subjective valoration of risk perception and alcohol consumption among Spanish students

Gil-Lacruz AI, Gil-Lacruz M
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 23
Page: 309-316
PDF size: 118.15 Kb.


Key words:

Alcohol, youth, information, perceptions.

ABSTRACT

Introduction
Although Spanish adolescents recognize that reiterative alcohol abuse has negative consequences over consumers and society in general, the percentages of teenagers who get drunk during the weekends keep alarming high.
Young people are exposed to a wide range of messages about the externalities related to alcohol consumption whose connotation and importance are divergent. Our main goal is to analyze which channels are the most effective to reduce alcohol abuse. To that end, we focus on a theoretical framework which combines the forming of risk perceptions with the decision of consuming alcoholic beverages.
We focus on young people because alcohol consumption patterns consolidate in adolescence and adolescents are also highly sensitive to peerpressure, and in general, to social forces.
Materials and methods
The main contribution of this paper lies in analyzing how the different sources of information (relatives, friends, teachers, official organism, mass media, seminars, hooked people and publications) configure risk perceptions.
To address the issue of endogeneity between risk perception and risky behaviors, we consider a simultaneous equation system, and to analyze the robustness of the results, we carry out two more different specifications: a model in which these endogenous variables are included but treated as exogenous and a model in which these variables are excluded.
We have drawn sub-populations of 21344, 26530 and 25521 high-school students from the Spanish National Surveys on Drug Use in the School Population 2000, 2002 and 2004.
We have also used the Harmonised Consumer Price Indexes (HCPI) as a proxy of the alcoholic beverages’ prices. These indexes, provided by the Spanish National Statistical Institute, are statistical measures which summarize the e olution of the acquisition capacity of the resident population in Spain to buy alcoholic drinks across Spanish provinces (n=50). Because these indexes also compute for geographical and temporal differences (for example, some Spanish provinces are important wine producers or some years have been specially good or bad for the agricultural sector given weather or economic conditions), we have introduced time and geographical dummy variables in order to control for these two dimensions.
Results
Our results validate the theoretical framework. The riskier the students consider the consumption of alcoholic beverages, the lower is their alcohol demand. This empirical evidence is fundamental in justifying the design of public polices oriented to inform young people about the real risks of consuming drugs.
This paper also brings to light that the most effective channels to inform young people are official organisms, parents and siblings, mass media, talks and seminars, and teachers. The other way ar und, friends seem to exert a negative influence.
The main conclusion we draw from these results is that alcohol consumption is a social issue. To design effective anti-drug policies, we have to take into account adolescents’ social environments: families, friends and schools, among others. It is fundamental to inform parents and teachers, and in general to reach the highest population section as possible. The good piece of news is that people who surround adolescence are getting more and more involved with their education; parents and teachers are sharing the responsibility of informing adolescents about drugs.


REFERENCES

  1. Spanish National Survey on Drug Use in the School Population. Spanish Government’s Delegation for the National Plan on Drug. Madrid, Spain: 2000, 2002 and 2004.

  2. Ortiz A, Soriano A, Galván J, Meza D. Tendencias y uso de cocaína en adolescentes y jóvenes de la Ciudad de México. Sistema de reporte de información en drogas. Salud Mental 2005;28:91-97.

  3. Pender NJ, Pender AR. Attitudes, subjective norms, and intentions to engage in health behaviors. Nursing Research 1986;35:15-18.

  4. Case A, Paxson C. Mothers and others: who invests in children’s health?. Journal of Health Economics 2001;20:301-328.

  5. Case A, Lubotsky D, Paxson C. Economic status and health in childhood: the origins of the gradient. Working Paper NBER 2001;8344.

  6. Carbone JC, Kverndokk S, Rørgeberg OJ. Smoking, health, risk and perception. J Health Economics 2005;24:631-653.

  7. Hsieh C, Yen L, Liu J, Lin C. Smoking, health knowledge and anti-smoking campaigns: an empirical study in Taiwan. J Health Economics 1996;15:87-104.

  8. Kenkel DS. Health behavior, health Knowledge and schooling. J Political Economy 1991;99:287-305.

  9. Fishbein M, Hall-Jamieson K, Zimmer E, von Haeften I et al. Avoiding the boomerang: Testing the relative effectiveness of antidrug public service announcements before a national campaign. American J Public Health 2002;92:238-245.

  10. Saffer H, Chaloupka F. The effect of tobacco advertising bans on tobacco consumption. J Health Economics 2000;19:1117-1137.

  11. Laux F. Addiction as a market failure: using rational addiction results to justify tobacco regulation. J Health Economics 2000;19:421-437.

  12. Viscusi WK. Smoking status and public responses to ambiguous scientific risk evidence. Southern Economic J 1999;66:250-270.

  13. Kenkel DS. Prevention. In Culyer, A.J. and Newhouse, J.P. (eds.), Handbook of health economics. Elsevier, Amsterdam: 2000.

  14. Slovic P. What does it mean to know a cumulative risk? Adolescents’ perceptions of short-term and long-term consequences of smoking. J Behavioral Decision Making 2000;13:259-266.

  15. Viscusi WK. Do smokers underestimate risks? J Political Economy 1990;98:1253-1269.

  16. Smith V, Desvousges W, Johnson F, Fisher A. Can public information programs affect risk perceptions? J Policy Analysis Management 1990;9:41-59.

  17. Viscusi WK. Age variations in risk perceptions and smoking decisions. Review Economics Statistic 1991;73:577-588.

  18. Viscusi WK, Magat WA, Huber J. Communication of ambiguous risk information. Theory Decision 1991;31:159-173.

  19. Costa J, Rovira J. Relative mortality risk and the decision to smoke. Working paper FEDEA 2000.

  20. Villa Moral Jiménez M, Ovejero Bernal A, Sirvent Ruiz C, Rodriguez Díaz FJ et al. Efectos diferenciales sobre las actitudes ante la experimentación con alcohol y la percepción de riesgo en adolescentes españoles consumidores de cannabis y alcohol. Salud Mental 2009;31:125-138.

  21. Spanish National Statistical Institute. Inebase. Available at http:// www.ine.es/inebase/menu3_soc_en.htm. Access date: May 29; 2009.

  22. Lundborg P, Lindgren B. Risk perceptions and alcohol consumption among young people. J Risk Uncertainty 2002;25:165-183.

  23. Nuño Gutiérrez BL, Álvarez Nemegyei JA, Velázquez Castañedo A, Tapia Curiel A. Comparación del ambiente familiar y el tipo de consumo de tabaco en adolescentes mexiacanos de nivel medio superior. Salud Mental 2008;31:361-369.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

CÓMO CITAR (Vancouver)

Salud Mental. 2010;33