medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirujano General

ISSN 2594-1518 (Electronic)
ISSN 1405-0099 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2011, Number S1

<< Back Next >>

Cir Gen 2011; 33 (S1)

Alternativas en el manejo de la necrosis pancreática infectada (NPI)

Luque-de-León E
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 28-31
PDF size: 205.97 Kb.


Key words:

No keywords

Text Extraction




REFERENCES

  1. Bradley EL III. A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, Ga, September 11 through 13,1992. Arch Surg 1993; 128(5): 586-90.

  2. Bollen TL, Besselink MG, van Santvoort HC, et al. Toward an update of the Atlanta classification on acute pancreatitis: review of new and abandoned terms. Pancreas 2007; 35: 107-13.

  3. Rau BM, Kemppainen EA, Gumbs AA, et al. Early assessment of pancreatic infections and overall prognosis in severe acute pancreatitis by procalcitonin (PCT) – A prospective international multicenter study. Ann Surg 2007; 245: 745-754.

  4. Mofidi R, Suttie SA, Patil PV, et al. The value of procalcitonin at predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis and development of infected pancreatic necrosis: systematic review. Surgery 2009; 146: 72-81.

  5. Nealon WH, Bhutani M, Riall TS, et al. A unifying concept: pancreatic ductal anatomy both predicts and determines the major complications resulting from pancreatitis. J Am Coll Surg 2009; 208: 790-801.

  6. Nealon WH, Walser E. Main pancreatic ductal anatomy can direct choice of modality for treating pancreatic pseudocysts (surgery versus percutaneous drainage). Ann Surg 2002; 235: 751-758.

  7. Freeny PC, Hauptmann E, Althaus SJ, et al. Percutaneous CT-guided catheter drainage of infected acute necrotizing pancreatitis: techniques and results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170: 969-75.

  8. Bradley EL, Howard TJ, van Sonnenberg E, Fotoohi M. Intervention in necrotizing pancreatitis: An evidence-based review of surgical and percutaneous alternatives. J Gastrointest Surg 2008; 12: 634-639.

  9. Mier J, Luque-de León E, Castillo A, et al. Early versus late necrosectomy in severe necrotizing pancreatitis. Am J of Surg 1997; 173: 71-75.

  10. Heinrich S, Schafer M, Rousson V, et al. Evidence-based treatment of acute pancreatitis: a look at established paradigms. Ann Surg 2006; 243: 154-68.

  11. Friedland S, Kaltenbach T, Sugimoto M, Soetikno R. Endoscopic necrosectomy of organized pancreatic necrosis: a currently practiced NOTES procedure. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2009; 16: 266-269.

  12. Besselink MG, van Santvoort HC, Nieuwenhuijs VB, et al. Minimally invasive “step-up approach” versus maximal necrosectomy in patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis (PANTER trial): design and rationale of a randomized controlled multicenter trial. BMC Surgery 2006; 6: 1-10.

  13. van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Bollen TL, et al. Case-matched comparison of the retroperitoneal approach with laparotomy for necrotizing pancreatitis. World J Surg 2007; 31: 1635-1642.

  14. van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Bakker OJ, et al. A step-up approach or open necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1491-502.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Gen. 2011;33