medigraphic.com
ISSN 0001-0944 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de la Asociación Dental Mexicana

2009, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev ADM 2009; 66 (4)

Evaluation of the application of a chemio-mechanical technique caries removal in dental pediatric patients

Sotelo ME, Juárez LMLA, Murrieta PF

Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 24-29
PDF size: 532.78 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The chemical remove is an alternative of dental caries treatment, and in Mexico, there is a high prevalence of children with this disease.
Objective. To evaluate the chemio-mechanical technique(Papacarie®) for the caries remove in primary teeth.
Method. A clinical study was performed in twenty pediatric patients from three to eight years old, selecting two homologous teeth with caries of second grade by child applying two different methods: the chemical-mechanical with Papacarie® and the conventional technique with high speed. We evaluated the working time, the color and texture of the cavity and the perception of pain through the scales of Licker and CHIPPS.
Results. The average working time was greater for the chemical-mechanical technique (p‹0.01). There were no statistically significant differences at cavity characteristics. The perception of pain was higher for the high speed rotational technique. (p‹0.05)
Conclussions. The Papacarie® technique might be useful in pediatric dentistry so I showed to be effective for caries remove. The cases treated by the chemicalmechanique technique and, the patients showed a better behaviour. No matter that requires greater working time.


REFERENCES

  1. Casanova-Rosado AJ, Medina-Solís CE, Casanova-Rosado JF, Vallejo- Sánchez AA, Maupomé G, Avila-Burgos L. Dental caries and associated factors in mexican school children aged 6-13 years. Acta Odontol Scand 2005; Aug; 63(4): 245-51.

  2. Pereira SM, Tagliaferro EP, Ambrosano GM, Cortelazzi KL, Meneghim Mde C, Pereira AC. Dental caries in 12-year-old school children and its relationship with socioeconomic and behavioural variables. Oral Health Prev Dent 2007; 5(4): 299-306.

  3. Armfield JM, Spencer AJ. Changes in South Australian children’s caries experience: is caries re-surfacing? Aust Dent J 2004; 49(4):2-12.

  4. Juárez-López LA, Murrieta-Pruneda F, Ortiz-Cruz E. Prevalencia de caries y su asociación con el estado nutricional y hábitos higiénicos en preescolares. Revista de la Academia de Odontopediatría 2006;18: 28-32.

  5. Segovia-Villanueva A, Estrella-Rodríguez R, Medina-Solís CE, Maupomé G. Caries severity and associated factors in preschool children aged 3-6 years old in Campeche City, México. Rev Salud Publica 2005;7(1):56-69.

  6. Cardenas Jaramillo D. Fundamentos de Odontología, Odontología Pediátrica. 3er ed. Medellin, Colombia: Fondo editorial CIB; 2003. p.154-158.

  7. Perrerías, Silva LR, Motta LJ, Bussadori SK. Remocao químico mecánica do gel papacaríe.RGO 2004; nov-dez ; 52(5) : 385-8.

  8. Guillen BCN, Chein VS. Tratamiento de última generación químico-mecánico de la caries dental. Odontología sanmarquina 2003; 5(11):57-59.

  9. AK Munshi,Amitha MH,Priya KS. Clinical evaluation of carisolv in the chemico-mechanical removal of carious dentin. J clinc pediatr dent 2001; 26 (1): 49-54.

  10. Kavadia Katerina, Karagianni Vassiliki,Polychronopoulou,Papagiannouli Lisa. Primary theeth caries removal using the carisolv chemomechanical method: a clinical trial. Pediatric Dentistry 2004; 26;1: 23-28.

  11. Tascón J. Restauración atraumática para el control de la caries dental: historia, características y apuntes de la técnica. Rev Panam Salud pública 2005; 17(2) : 110-115.

  12. Aguilar Culquicóndor Eliabel. Tratamiento ultraconservador y minimamente invasivo de la caries dental. Revista científi ca-asociación de odontología restauradora y biomateriales Núcleo–Guayas 2006; (4) 3.

  13. Azrak B, Callaway A, Grundheber A, Stender E, Willershausen B. Comparisson of the efficacy of chemomechanical caries removal (CarisolvTM) With that of conventional excavation in reducing the cariogenic flora. International. Journal of pediatric dentistry 2004;14: 182-191.

  14. Raulino Da Silva, Hartley Murillo, Marcilio Santos, et. al. Utilización del gel de la papaya para la remoción de la caries-reporte de un caso con seguimiento clínico de un año. Acta odontol Venez 2005;43(2): 155-158.

  15. Bussadori SK, Guedes CC, Martins MD, Fernández KP, Santos EM. Gel a base de papaína: una nueva alternativa para la remoción de la caries. Actas odontol.Venez 2006; 3(5).

  16. Yazici AR, Arilla P, Osgunaltay, Muftuoglus. Invitro Comparisson of the efficacy of Carisolv™and conventional rotary instrument in caries removal. Journal of oral rehabilitation 2003:30; 1177-1182.

  17. Wong Dl ,Hockenberry-Eaton M, Wilson D Winkelstein ML. Wong´s essentials of pediatric nurcing, 6ta ed; St Louis: Mosby; 2001. p. 25-27

  18. Paladino MA, Cavallieri S, J de Concerca M. Anestesia Pediátrica, Ed. Corpus, Argentina: 2006. p 216-218.

  19. Anusavice KJ, Kincheloe JE. Comaparisson of pain associated with mechanical and chemomechanical removal of caries. J Dent Res 1987; 66: 1680-3.

  20. Chaussain-Miller C, Decup F, Domejean-Orliaguet S, Gillet D, Tumelin-Chemla F, Tubiana J, et al. Clinical evaluation of the carisolv chemomechanical caries removal technique according to the site/stage concept, a revised caries classification system. Clin Oral Invest 2003;7: 32-37.

  21. Guedes CC, et. al. Remocao química e mecanica de lesao de cárie em dente hipoplasico utilizando-se gel a base de papaína Papacaríe: relato de caso clínico. ConScietiae Saúde Sao Paulo2006: (5):59-65.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com