medigraphic.com
ISSN 0001-0944 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de la Asociación Dental Mexicana

2010, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev ADM 2010; 67 (1)

Scientific evidence for the clinical application of self-etching conditioners in orthodontics

Scougall VRJ

Language: Spanish
References: 28
Page: 8-12
PDF size: 287.66 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Despite great scientific advances in the field of adhesive materials used in orthodontics, further improvements in the properties of these are needed in order to prevent the formation of white spot lesions. When brackets are debonded white spot lesions are frequently observed. In response to this common problem, researchers and clinicians, and indeed manufacturers, have been working tirelessly to produce adhesive systems with the capacity to release and recharge fluoride ions to protect the enamel surface against the formation of white spot lesions. Furthermore, self-etching primers (SEPs) have now been introduced onto the market. The purpose of this article is to describe the advantages to be obtained from using SEPs in daily orthodontic practice. In this context, scientific evidence drawn from previous studies will be provided to identify the most important properties and contraindications of the aforementioned materials. In general, SEPs produce a more conservative etch pattern on the enamel surface than do conventional methods, can be applied more quickly (thus reducing the risk of contamination with saliva), and also require shorter consultation times.


REFERENCES

  1. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955;34:849-53.

  2. Newman GV. Epoxy adhesives for orthodontic attachments: progress report. Am J Orthod. 1965;51:901-12.

  3. D’Attilio M, Traini T, Di Iorio D, Varvara G, Festa F, Tecco S. Shear bond strength, bond failure, and scanning electron microscopy analysis of a new flowable composite for orthodontic use. Angle Orthod 2005;75:410-5.

  4. Rix D, Foley TF, Mamandras A. Comparison of bond strength of three adhesives: composite resin, hybrid GIC, and glass-filled GIC. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119:36-42.

  5. Bishara SE, VonWald L, Laffoon JF, Warren JJ. Effect of a selfetch primer/adhesive on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119:621-4.

  6. Vicente A, Bravo LA, Romero M. Influence of a nonrinse conditioner on the bond strength of brackets bonded with a resin adhesive system. Angle Orthod 2005;75:400-5.

  7. Hosein I, Sherriff M, Ireland AJ. Enamel loss during bonding, debonding, and cleanup with use of a self-etching primer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:717-24.

  8. Eminkahyagil N, Arman A, Cetinsahin A, Karabulut E. Effect of resin-removal methods on enamel and shear bond strength of rebonded brackets. Angle Orthod 2006;76:314–21.

  9. Kim MJ, Lim BS, Chang WG, Lee YK, Rhee SH, Yang HC. Phosp horic acid incorp orated with acidulated p hosp hate fluoride gel etchant effects on bracket bonding. Angle Orthod 2005;75:678-84.

  10. Bishara SE, VonWald L, Laffoon JF, Jakobsen JR. Effect of altering the type of enamel conditioner on the shear bond strength of a resin-reinforced glass ionomer adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;118:288-94.

  11. Trites B, Foley TF, Banting D. Bond strength comparison of 2 self-etching primers over a 3-month storage period. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:709-16.

  12. Cehreli ZC, Kecik D, Kocadereli I. Effect of self-etching primer and adhesive formulations on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;127:573-9.

  13. Arnold RW, Combe EC, Warford JHJr. Bonding of stainless steel brackets to enamel with a new self-etching primer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122:274-6.

  14. Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T. Failure rate of selfligating and edgewise brackets bonded with conventional acid etching and a self-etching primer. Angle Orthod 2006;76:119-22.

  15. Tecco S, Traini T, Caputi S, Festa F, de Luca V, D’Attilio M. A new one-step dental flowable composite for orthodontic use: an in vitro bond strength study. Angle Orthod 2005;75:672-7.

  16. Fjeld M, Ogaard B. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of enamel surfaces exposed to 3 orthodontic bonding systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:575-81.

  17. Scougall Vilchis RJ, Hotta Y, Yamamoto K. Examination of the enamel-adhesive interface with focused ion beam and scanning electron microscopy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:646-50.

  18. Scougall-Vilchis RJ, Zárate-Díaz C, Hotta M, Yamamoto K. Efectos de un nuevo agente de autograbado en la resistencia al descementado de las brackets ortodóncicas. Rev Esp Ortod 2008; 38: 207-12.

  19. Scougall-Vilchis RJ, Yamamoto S, Kitai N, Yamamoto K. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with different self-etching adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 136: 425-30.

  20. Scougall-Vilchis RJ, Ohashi S, Yamamoto K. Effects of 6 different self-etching primers on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 135: 424.e1-e7.

  21. Scougall-Vilchis RJ, Zárate-Díaz C, Wakamatsu N, Nakagawa T. Resistencia al descementado de botones linguales colocados con diferentes sistemas adhesivos. Rev Esp Ortod 2009; 39: 33-8.

  22. Scougall-Vilchis RJ, Hotta Y, Yamamoto K. Examination of six orthodontic adhesives with electron microscopy, hardness tester and energy dispersive x-ray micro analyzer. Angle Orthod 2008; 78: 655-61.

  23. Faltermeier A, Rosentritt M, Reicheneder C, Mussig D. Experimental composite brackets: influence of filler level on the mechanical properties. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;130:699.e9-e14.

  24. Faltermeier A, Rosentritt M, Faltermeier R, Reicheneder C, Mussig D. Influence of filler level on the bond strength of orthodontic adhesives. Angle Orthod. 2007;77:494-8.

  25. Scougall-Vilchis RJ, Hotta Y, Hotta M, Idono T, Yamamoto K. Examination of composite resins with electron microscopy, microhardness tester and energy dispersive x-ray microanalyzer. Dent Mater J 2009; 28: 102-12.

  26. Ogaard B, Bishara SE, Duschner H. Enamel effects during bonding-debonding and treatment with fixed appliances. In: Graber TM, Eliades T, Athanasiou AE, eds. Risk Management in Orthodontics: Experts Guide to Malpractice. Carol Stream, Ill: Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc; 2004:19-46.

  27. Powers JM, Messersmith ML. Enamel etching and bond strength. In: Brantley WA, Eliades T, eds. Orthodontic Materials: Scientific and Clinical Aspects. Stuttgart, Germany: Thieme. 2001:105-22.

  28. Eminkahyagil N, Arman A, Cetinsahin A, Karabulut E. Effect of resin-removal methods on enamel and shear bond strength of rebonded brackets. Angle Orthod 2006;76:314–21.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com