Durán SS

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 441-443
PDF size: 335.17 Kb.

ABSTRACT

The phimosis and paraphimosis are affections that could be in relationship for inflammation and narrowing of the foreskin. The inflammation could be caused for a trauma or associate with a poor personal hygiene.During the first years there is a greasy substance that accumulates down in foreskin. The name of that secretion is smegma, wich look like yellowish cysts and they don’t make a problem if not have a contact with a exterior. May be remove with a bath. The foreskin adherences should not liberate forcibly, the greater percentage resolves spontaneously with the penis growth and erections. AtURoLoGÍAthree years old the phimosis is present only in 10 % of children and at seventeen years old only a one percent have a phimosis. An early forced retraction of foreskin can produce an iatrogenic scare.

REFERENCES

1. Baquiano P., Manual de Urología Esencial, Universidad Catolica de Chile.

2. Cardona David, Una alternativa en el manejo de la fimosis, Acta Pediátrica Costarricense, v.13n.1 San José enero. 1999.

3. Elder JS. Abnormalities of the genitalia in boys and their surgical management. In: Wein AJ, ed. Campbell-Walsh Urology. 9th ed. Philadelphia, Pa.” Saunders Elsevier; 2007: chap 126.

4. Jordan GH, Schlossberg SM. Surgery of the penis and urethra. In: Wein AJ, ed. Campbell-Walsh Urology. 9th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders Elsevier; 2007: chap 33.

5. Kayaba H, Tamura H, Kitajima S, Fujiwara Y, Kato T et al. Análisis of shape and retractibility of the prepuce in 603 japanese boys. J Urol 1996; 1813-1815.

6. Maizels M. Normal development of the urinary tract, In: Cambell’s Urology, 6th edition. Edited by P Walsh PC, Retik AB, Stamey TA; Jr Vaugman ED. Philadelphia: WB. Saunders Co. Vol. 2 chapt 32. 1992:301-1343.

7. Marzaro M, Carmignola G, Zoppellaro F, et al. Phimosis: whwn does it require urgical intervention? Minerva Pediatr 1997; 49: 245-248.

8. Morles C. Julio, Gonzalez F. Pedro, Morales A. Aymeé, Cordero J. Emilio, Guerra R. Marlen, Mora C. Barbarita, Fimosis: ¿Son necesarias la circuncisión o la dilatación forzada? rev. Cubana Pediatri. V 73 n.4. Ciudad de la Habana. Oct- Dic- 2001.

9. Oldham, T Keith. Colombani, Paul M. Foglia, Robert P. Surgery of Infants and Children, 1ª ed. 1543 Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven.

10. Patel. H: The problem of routine circumcision. Can. Med. Assoc. J 1966; 95:576-581.

11. Persad R, Sharum S,Mc Tavish J, Indes C, Moriquand P. Clinical presentation and pathophysiology of meatal stenosis following circunmcision. Br J Urol 1995;75:91-93.