medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Salud Mental

ISSN 0185-3325 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2011, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Salud Mental 2011; 34 (1)

Factores asociados a la percepción de eficacia materna durante el posparto

Navarro C, Navarrete L, Asunción LM
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 34
Page: 37-43
PDF size: 100.85 Kb.


Key words:

Maternal efficacy, postpartum depression, schooling, stress.

ABSTRACT

The objective was to study maternal efficacy at two moments during the postpartum: at 6 weeks, and at between 4 and 6 months after delivery and its relationship with various socio-demographic and psychological factors in Mexican postpartum women. Maternal selfefficacy (MSE) is a concept that alludes to the mother’s ability to perform her maternal role. It is defined as the judgment that the mother formulates concerning her own competence and the effectiveness with which she copes with the demands and needs of the infant. Some studies show that mothers who perceive themselves as possessing high self-efficacy exhibit more effective behaviors, as well as a greater ability to adapt and a capacity to respond and interpret the needs of the infant, as well as to encourage and stimulate him or her. Some of the factors that influence the perception of self-efficacy are social support, especially when provided by significant others, and when the support networks reinforce the belief that the task is being carried out adequately. Educational attainment and living with a partner act similarly. On the other hand, variables that have a negative effect include depression and high stress levels. In one way or another, MSE affects child rearing practices: those who perceive themselves to be effective are more involved in the activities of their children, in their cognitive stimulation at home during the pre-school period. Thus, MSE during the postpartum period exerts an influence on the mother-child relationship and the development of the latter, with long-term consequences. In short, the study of the perception of maternal self-efficacy is not only of theoretical interest, but also, knowledge of the manner in which it takes place and the factors that act upon it opens up the possibility of influencing the MSE, improving the maternal role and the infants’ well-being. In Mexico, we were unable to find published data on this subject, which is why it is particularly important to study it.
Materials and methods: Participants. The study is a secondary data analyses from a research directed toward evaluating a psycho-educational intervention during pregnancy. The sample included women attending prenatal care at three health care institutions in Mexico City. Participants were interviewed at 6 weeks (n=149) and at between 4-6 months postpartum (n=156). Inclusion criteria were being ›18 years of age, not being ‹26 weeks pregnant, having completed primary school and having depressive symptomatology and/or a prior history of depression. Exclusion criteria were presenting bipolar disorder or substance abuse. The sample was taken as a sole group, independent of whether the participants had taken part in intervention (eight psycho-educational group sessions oriented toward preventing postpartum depression)or control conditions (treatment as usual provided by the institution), because no differences were found between these groups in terms of relevant variables (e.g. symptoms of depression). Instruments. These included measurements in the following areas: 1. socio-demographic information; 2. the Maternal Self-Efficacy Questionnaire; 3. the Beck Depression Inventory second edition (BDI-II); 4. Social Support Rate Scale (SSRS) and the Family Adaptation, Partnership, Growth, Affection, and Resolve (Family APGAR); 5. Anxiety scale, the Hopkins Symptoms Check List-90 (HSCL-90); 6. the Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventory, and 7. stressing events, with a 12 item scale. Procedure. After selection of participants based on inclusion criteria, these were assigned randomly to either the control or the intervention group. After delivery, the aforementioned instruments were applied to participants by means of an interview at the two moments of the postpartum period. Two logistic regression analyses were conducted (one for each postnatal point) to evaluate the relationship between socio-demographic (age, schooling, civil status, number of pregnancies) and psychological (symp oms of depression and anxiety, self-esteem, stressing events, social support) variables on MSE. Additionally, pertaining to the intervention and control condition was introduced in the analyzes in order to control for the possible effect of participation in the intervention.
Results: With respect to sample characteristics, there was a similar number of women ‹26 (47.3%) than women aged ›26 years (52.7%); the majority had ‹10 years of schooling (66.7%), had a partner (married or cohabitating) (86%), and had less than one pregnancy (62.7%). Logistic regression analyzes for 6 weeks postpartum showed that not having a partner (Odds ratio [OR]=1.98), postpartum depressive symptomatology (OR=2.39), stressful events (OR=2.18), and belonging to the control group (OR=4.37) were related to a low maternal self-efficacy; for the period of 4-6 months postpartum, not having a partner (OR=2.97), less schooling (OR=2.18), and postpartum depressive symptomatology (OR=3.97) were associated with the variable under study.
Discussion: Postnatal depressive symptomatology and not having a partner predicted low perception of maternal self-efficacy at 6 weeks and at 4-6 months postpartum, which indicates that its effect is more chronic. The repercussion of depression can be explained by the reduction of the sensation of maternal capacity that it produces, while not having a partner, which is one of the most important supports for the adaptation of the women to maternity, renders maternal performance difficult. The presence of stressful events at 6 postnatal weeks also hampers the perception of self-efficacy in the care of the infant, which is explicable because of the great demands to which the mother is submitted due to the baby’s young age during this period. For itspart, limited schooling exerted adverse effects 4-6 months after delivery. It has been documented that this variable is closely associated with mental health in general; it reduces the resources for coping with stress and deteriorates self-esteem. Finally, being part of the control group, that is, not having participated in the psychoeducational intervention, negatively influenced maternal self-efficacy, but had no effect at 4-6 months postpartum. This result that shows that in a first instance participating in a certain condition affected the dependent variable plus the fact that the selection criterion for the main study was that they all scored in depressive symptoms restricts the generalization of these findings. The implications of these findings are that perception of maternal self-efficacy could be improved through specific programs directed toward women displaying limited educational attainment, lack of a partner, postpartum depressive symptoms, and stressing events. The benefit would not only translate into a more positive feeling of the mother with respect to her abilities, but also, theoretically, into a better performance of her maternal role, and consequently, into the wellbeing and development of their infants.


REFERENCES

  1. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review 1977;84:191-215.

  2. Teti D, Gelfand D. Behavioral competence among mothers of infants in the first year: The mediational role of maternal self-efficacy. Child Dev1991;62:918-929.

  3. Freeman, Cynthia R. Relative contributions of mastery, maternal affective states, and childhood difficulty to maternal self-efficacy. Sciences Engineering 2007;67(10-B):6111.

  4. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. USA: 1997.

  5. Bandura A. Guía para la construcción de escalas de autoeficacia. Evaluar 2002;2:1-37.

  6. Sanders MR, Woolley ML. The relationship between maternal self-efficacy and parenting practices: implications for parent training. Child Care Health Dev 2005;31(1):65-73.

  7. Donovan WL, Leavitt LA, Walsh RO. Maternal. Self-efficacy: illusory control and it’s effect on susceptibility to leamed helplessness. Child Dev 1990;61:1638-1647.

  8. Eaton M. Self-efficacy in first-time mothers: a comparison of younger and older mothers. Department on Family Studies and Human Services College of Human Ecology. Manhattan, Kansas: Kansas State University; 2007.

  9. Lewis MA, Rook KS. Social control in personal relationships: Impact on health behaviors and psychological distress. Health Psychol 1999;18:63-71.

  10. Bates J, Bennett-Freeland C, Lounsbury M. Measurement of infant difficultness. Child Dev 1979;50:794-803.

  11. Haslam K, Pakenham A, Smith A. Social support and postpartum depressive symptomatology: The ediating role of maternal self-efficacy. Infant Ment Health J 2006;27(3):276–291.

  12. Cutrona C, Troutman B. Social support, infant temperament, and prenting slf-efieacy: A mdiational mdel of pstpartum dpression. Child Dev 1986;57:1507-1518.

  13. Ruchala P, James D. Social support, knowledge of infant development, and maternal confidence among adolescent and adult mothers. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 1997;26:685-689.

  14. Machida S, Taylor A, Kim J. The role of maternal beliefs in predicting home learning activities in head start families. Fam Relat 2002;51:176-184.

  15. Knudson-Martin C, Silverstein R. Suffering in silence: a qualitative metadata-analysis of postpartum depression. J Marital Fam Ther 2009;35(2):149-158.

  16. Wells-Parker E, Miller DI, Topping S. Development of control of outcome scales and selfefficacy scales for women in four life roles. J Pers Assess 1990;54:564–575.

  17. Lara MA, Navarro C, Navarrete L. Outcome results of a psycho-educational intervention in pregnancy to prevent PPD: A randomized control trial. J Affect Disord 2010;122:109–117.

  18. Lara MA, Navarro C, Navarrete L, Le HN. Retention rates and potential predictors in a longitudinal randomized control trial to prevent post partum depression. Salud Mental 2010;33(5):429-436.

  19. Le H, Sharon F. Culture, cntex, and mternal slf-eficacy in Latina mothers. Appl Dev Sci 2008;12(4):198–201.

  20. Beck A, Steer R, Brown G. Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation; 1996.

  21. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Erbaugh J. An Inventory for Measuring Depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961;4:53-63.

  22. Penley J, Wiebe J, Nwosu A. Psychometric properties of the spanish Beck Depression Inventory-II in a medical sample. Psychol Assess 2003;15:569-577.

  23. Jurado S, Villegas ME, Méndez L, Rodríguez F et al. La estandarización del Inventario de Depresión de Beck para los residentes de la Ciudad de México. Salud Mental 1998;21(3):26-31.

  24. Norwood S. The social support Apgar: Instrument development and testing. Res Nurs Health 1996;19:143-152.

  25. Sheng X, Le HN, Perry D. Transcult perceived satisfaction with social support and depressive symptoms in perinatal Latinas. Nurs 2010;21(1):35-44.

  26. Derogatis L. SCL-90-R. Revised version manual 1. USA: Nacional Computer Systems, Inc.; 1978.

  27. Cruz C, López L, Blas C, González L et al. Datos sobre la validez y confiabilidad de las Symptom Check List 90 (SCL 90) en una muestra de sujetos mexicanos. Salud Mental 2005;28(1):72-81.

  28. Lara C, Espinosa I, Cárdenas ML, Fócil M et al. Confiabilidad y validez de la SCL-90 en la evaluación de psicopatología en mujeres. Salud Mental 2005;28(3):42–50.

  29. Coopersmith S. The antecedents of self-esteem. Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychologists’ Press; 1981.

  30. Lara MA, Verduzco MA, Acevedo M, Cortés J. Validez y confiabilidad del Inventario de Autoestima de Coopersmith para adultos, en población mexicana. Rev Latinoam Psicol 1993;25(2):247-255.

  31. Salgado de Snyder N. Family life across the border: Mexican wives left behind. Hisp J Behav Sci 1993;15(3):391-401.

  32. Lara MA, Navarro C, Navarrete L. Influencia de los sucesos vitales y el apoyo social en una intervención psicoeducativa para mujeres con depresión. Salud Pública Mex 2004;46:378-387.

  33. Lara MA, García T. Despertando tu amor para recibir a tu bebé. Como prevenir la Tristeza y la depresión posparto en el embarazo y después del parto. México: Pax; 2009.

  34. Lara MA, García MT. Prevención de la depresión posparto: Guía para orientadoras. México: Pax; 2010 (en prensa).




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Salud Mental. 2011;34