medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista ADM Órgano Oficial de la Asociación Dental Mexicana

ISSN 0001-0944 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de la Asociación Dental Mexicana
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2010, Number 6

<< Back Next >>

Rev ADM 2010; 67 (6)

Distraction Osteogenesis: An alternative for the reconstruction of alveolar ridges. When and why

Lugo MJC
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 23
Page: 263-267
PDF size: 596.15 Kb.


Key words:

Distraction Osteogenesis, atrophied alveolar ridges, reconstruction of alveolar ridges.

ABSTRACT

We present a detailed description of the surgical technique of distraction osteogenesis for the reconstruction of severely atrophied alveolar ridges, its historical evolution and biological bases.
The intraoral distraction device is a technique whose results remain somewhat inconsistent, though it is associated with a low morbidity rate and significant bone tissue and soft tissue gain compared to traditionally used surgical techniques.
It reduces the waiting time between the reconsestruction of the atrophied alveolar ridge and the placement of osseointegrated implants, and where a greater volume of tissue is required, it is compatible with other bone reconstruction techniques, once the consolidation phase is complete.


REFERENCES

  1. Codivilla A. On the means of lengthening in the lower limbs, the muscles, and tissues which are shortened through deformity. Am J Orthop Surg 1905; 2:353-369.

  2. Ilizarov G. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues. Part I. The influence of stability of fixation and soft tissue preservation. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1989; 238:249-281.

  3. Ilizarov G. The tension-Stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues. Part II. The influence of the rate and frecuency of distraction. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1989; 239: 263-285.

  4. Snyder C, Levine G, Sawanson H. Mendibular lengthening by gradual distraction. Preliminary report. J. Plast Reconstr Surg 1973, 51: 506-508.

  5. Cope JB, Samchukov ML, Cherkashin AM. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis: a historic perspective and future directions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1990, 115: 448-460.

  6. Engel PS, Rauch DM, Ladov MJ, Precheur HV, Stern RK. Alveolar distraction osteogenesis: A new alternative to bone grafts. Report of thee cases. J N J Dent Assoc 1999, 70:15-57.

  7. Block M, Chang A, Crawford C. Mandibular alveolar ridge augmentation in the dogs using distraction osteogenesis J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996; 54: 309-314

  8. Cano J, Martinez-González JM, Gonzalo JC, Rivero C, Donado A. Distracción Alveolar Histogénica II : Diseños Actuales y Perspectivas Futuras. Arch Odontoestomatol 2002; 18(3): 189-198.

  9. McAllister BS. Vertical alveolar ridge augmentation utilizing the ACE Osteogenic Distractor. En Samchukov ML, Cope JB, Cherkasin AM., Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis. St. Louis:Mosby, 2001: 414-422.

  10. Holliknger JO. Buck DC, Bruder SP. Biology of bone healing: its impact on clinical therapy. En Lynch SE, Genco RJ, Marx RE. Tissue engineering. Applications in maxillofacial surgery and periodontics. Illinois: Quintessence, 1999: 17-53.

  11. Samchukov ML, Cope JB, Cherkashin AM. Biological basis of new bone formation under the influence of tension stress. St Louis: Mosby, 2001: 21-52.

  12. Cope JB, Samchuov ML. Regenerate bone formation and remodeling during mandibular osteodistraction. Angle Orthod 2000; 70(2): 99-111.

  13. Jazrawi LM, Majeska RJ, Klein ML E, Stromberg L, Einhorn TA. Bone and cartilage formation in an experimental model of distraction osteogenesis. J Orthop Trauma 1998; 12(2): 111-116.

  14. Sawaki Y, Ohkubo H, Yamamoto H, Ueda M. Mandibular lengthening by intraoral distraction using osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996; 11:186-193.

  15. Gaggl A, Schultes G, Kärcher H. Vertical alveolar ridge distraction with prosthetic treatable distractors: a clinical investigation. Int J Oral Maxilofac Implants 2000; 15: 701-710.

  16. Chiapasco M, Romeo E, Vogel G. Vertical distraction osteogenesis of edentulous ridges for improvement of oral implant positioning: A clinical report of preliminary results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994; 52: 952-958.

  17. Davies J, Turner S, sandy JR, distraccion osteogenesis. A review. Br Dent J 1998; 185 (9): 462-467.

  18. Bell W, Gonzalez M, Samchukov M, Guerrero C. Intraoral widening and leigthening of the mandible baboons by distracción osteogenesis. J Oral maxillofac Surg 1999; 57: 548-562.

  19. Block M, Almerico B, Crawford C, Gardiner D, Chang A. Bone response to functioning implants in dog mandibular alveolar ridges augmented with distraccion osteogenesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; 13:342-351.

  20. Oda T, Sawaki Y, Ueda M. Experimental alveolar ridge augmentation by distraction osteogenesis using a simple device that permits secondary implants placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15: 95-102.

  21. Rachmiel A, Srouji S, Peled M. Alveolar ridge augmentation by distraction osteogenesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001, 30:510-517.

  22. Urbani G, Consolo U, Lombardo G. Alveolar bone distraction for implant placement. Craniofacial distaction osteogenesis. St Louis: Mosby, 2001: 423-432.

  23. Lehrhaupt NB. alveolar distraction: A Posible New Alternative to bone grafting. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2001, 21:121-125.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev ADM. 2010;67