medigraphic.com
Organo Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Urología

2007, Number 6

<< Back

Rev Mex Urol 2007; 67 (6)

Las revistas médicas y la metodología de sus escritos. Normas de Vancouver para la publicación de un artículo científico

Sosa-de-Martínez MC, Pablos-Hach JL, Martínez-Sosa MC

Language: Spanish
References: 53
Page: 329-334
PDF size: 92.45 Kb.


ABSTRACT

In the second topic of this series. several aspects of the Vancouver Norms, that is “The uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: writing and editing for biomedical”, will be presented. In the present one, we mention relevant facts about their origin, and define the following concepts: peer and peer-reviewed journal. The editor’s and the owner’s role, editorial freedom, and relevant aspects of the relation between owner and editor are briefly described.


REFERENCES

  1. Huth EJ. Medical style & format. An international manual for authors, editors, and publishers. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1987.

  2. Haas E. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. CBE Views. 1980;3: 12-5. En: Huth EJ Medical style & format. An international manual for authors, editors, and publishers. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 2a. ed. 1987 (5a. reimpresión).

  3. Comité Internacional de editores de revistas médicas (ICMJE). Requisitos de uniformidad para manuscritos enviados a revistas biomédicas: redacción y preparación de la edición de una publicación biomédica. Actualizado en noviembre de 2003. Rev Mex Urol. 2006;66(1):38-61.

  4. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: writing and editing for biomedical publication. http://www.icmje/index/html (Consultado en noviembre del 2006).

  5. Weller AC. Editorial policy and the assessment of quality among medical journals. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1987;75(4):310-7.

  6. Sosa-de-Martínez MC, Carnevale A, Avendaño-Inestrillas J. Comparación de las normas para autores de revistas médicas mexicanas con las normas de Vancouver. Rev Invest Clin. 1995;47:203-10.

  7. Smith G. The role of the editor. Hall GH [ed.]. How to write a paper London: BMJ Publishing Group 1994: 78-88.

  8. Huth EJ. How to write and publish papers in the medical sciences .Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 2a. ed. 1990.

  9. Loría A, Lisker R. Objetivos, estrategias y tribulaciones de la RIC. Rev Invest Clin. 1995;47(2):89-93.

  10. Home PD. Técnicas para asegurarse que su próximo trabajo nunca se llegue a publicar. Bol of Sanit Panam. 1992;113:150-5.

  11. Iverson C, Flanagin A, Fontanarosa PB, Glass RM, Glitman P, Lantz JC et al. American Medical Association. Manual of style: A guide for authors and editors. Chicago: Williams & Wilkins 1997.

  12. Vercueil AE. Peer review. S Afr Med J. 1984;65:863-4. En: Lock S. Apendix II: Semantics. A difficult balance: editorial peer review in medicine. Philadelphia: ISI Press 1986:142-7.

  13. Lock S. Apendix II: Semantics. A difficult balance: editorial peer review in medicine. Philadelphia: ISI Press 1986:142-7.

  14. Colaianni LA. Peer review in journals indexed in Index medicus. JAMA. 1994;272(2):156-8.

  15. Smith R. Conflicts of interest: how money clouds objectivity. The trouble with medical journals. Londres: The Royal Society of Medicine Press; 2006:125-37.

  16. Wilkes MS, Kravitz RL. Policies, practices, and attitudes of North American medical journal editors. J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10(8):443-50.

  17. Davies HTO, Rennie D. Independence, governance, and trust. JAMA. 1999;281:2344-6.

  18. Garrow J, Butterfield M, Marshall J, Williamson A. The reported training and experience of editors in chief of specialist clinical medical journals. JAMA. 1998;280(3):286-7.

  19. World Medical Association: Editorial Policy Committee. WAME Policy Statements. The Responsibilities of Medical Editors. http://www.wame.org/resources/

  20. policies#responsibilities. Accesado el 17 de mayo del 2007.

  21. Smith R. Editorial freedom: empty slogan or holy grail. Balancing Act. Essays to Honour Stephen Lock. London: Keyne Press, 1991:36-48.

  22. Relman AS. About editors. En: Lock S [ed]. The future of medical journals: In commemoration of 150 years of the British Medical Journal. London: British Medical Journal 1991:55-61.

  23. Hoey J, Caplan CE, Elmslie T, Flegel KM, Joseph KS, Palepu A, Todkill AM. Science, sex and semantics: the firing of George Lundberg. Can Med Assoc J. 1999;161:507-8.

  24. Hoey J. When journals are branded, editors get burnt: the ousting of Jerome Kassirer from the New England Journal of Medicine. Can Med Assoc J. 1999;161(5): 529-30.

  25. Smith R. 12. Editorial misconduct, freedom and accountability: amateurs at work. The trouble with medical journals. Londres: The Royal Society of Medicine Press 2006:139-54.

  26. Hoey J. Editorial independence and the Canadian Medical Association Journal. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354(19):1982-3.

  27. World Medical Association: Editorial Policy Committee. WAME Policy Statements. The Relationship Between Journal Editors-in-Chief and Owners (formerly titled Editorial Independence). http://www.wame.org/resources/policies#responsibilities. Junio 19, 2000; versión modificada mayo 15, 2006 Accesado: mayo 17, 2007.

  28. Huth EJ. Medical style & format. An international manual for authors, editors, and publishers. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1987.

  29. Haas E. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. CBE Views. 1980;3: 12-5. En: Huth EJ Medical style & format. An international manual for authors, editors, and publishers. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 2a. ed. 1987 (5a. reimpresión).

  30. Comité Internacional de editores de revistas médicas (ICMJE). Requisitos de uniformidad para manuscritos enviados a revistas biomédicas: redacción y preparación de la edición de una publicación biomédica. Actualizado en noviembre de 2003. Rev Mex Urol. 2006;66(1):38-61.

  31. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: writing and editing for biomedical publication. http://www.icmje/index/html (Consultado en noviembre del 2006).

  32. Weller AC. Editorial policy and the assessment of quality among medical journals. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1987;75(4):310-7.

  33. Sosa-de-Martínez MC, Carnevale A, Avendaño-Inestrillas J. Comparación de las normas para autores de revistas médicas mexicanas con las normas de Vancouver. Rev Invest Clin. 1995;47:203-10.

  34. Smith G. The role of the editor. Hall GH [ed.]. How to write a paper London: BMJ Publishing Group 1994: 78-88.

  35. Huth EJ. How to write and publish papers in the medical sciences .Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 2a. ed. 1990.

  36. Loría A, Lisker R. Objetivos, estrategias y tribulaciones de la RIC. Rev Invest Clin. 1995;47(2):89-93.

  37. Home PD. Técnicas para asegurarse que su próximo trabajo nunca se llegue a publicar. Bol of Sanit Panam. 1992;113:150-5.

  38. Iverson C, Flanagin A, Fontanarosa PB, Glass RM, Glitman P, Lantz JC et al. American Medical Association. Manual of style: A guide for authors and editors. Chicago: Williams & Wilkins 1997.

  39. Vercueil AE. Peer review. S Afr Med J. 1984;65:863-4. En: Lock S. Apendix II: Semantics. A difficult balance: editorial peer review in medicine. Philadelphia: ISI Press 1986:142-7.

  40. Lock S. Apendix II: Semantics. A difficult balance: editorial peer review in medicine. Philadelphia: ISI Press 1986:142-7.

  41. Colaianni LA. Peer review in journals indexed in Index medicus. JAMA. 1994;272(2):156-8.

  42. Smith R. Conflicts of interest: how money clouds objectivity. The trouble with medical journals. Londres: The Royal Society of Medicine Press; 2006:125-37.

  43. Wilkes MS, Kravitz RL. Policies, practices, and attitudes of North American medical journal editors. J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10(8):443-50.

  44. Davies HTO, Rennie D. Independence, governance, and trust. JAMA. 1999;281:2344-6.

  45. Garrow J, Butterfield M, Marshall J, Williamson A. The reported training and experience of editors in chief of specialist clinical medical journals. JAMA. 1998;280(3):286-7.

  46. World Medical Association: Editorial Policy Committee. WAME Policy Statements. The Responsibilities of Medical Editors. http://www.wame.org/resources/policies#responsibilities. Accesado el 17 de mayo del 2007.

  47. Smith R. Editorial freedom: empty slogan or holy grail. Balancing Act. Essays to Honour Stephen Lock. London: Keyne Press, 1991:36-48.

  48. Relman AS. About editors. En: Lock S [ed]. The future of medical journals: In commemoration of 150 years of the British Medical Journal. London: British Medical Journal 1991:55-61.

  49. Hoey J, Caplan CE, Elmslie T, Flegel KM, Joseph KS, Palepu A, Todkill AM. Science, sex and semantics: the firing of George Lundberg. Can Med Assoc J. 1999;161:507-8.

  50. Hoey J. When journals are branded, editors get burnt: the ousting of Jerome Kassirer from the New England Journal of Medicine. Can Med Assoc J. 1999;161(5): 529-30.

  51. Smith R. 12. Editorial misconduct, freedom and accountability: amateurs at work. The trouble with medical journals. Londres: The Royal Society of Medicine Press 2006:139-54.

  52. Hoey J. Editorial independence and the Canadian Medical Association Journal. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354(19):1982-3.

  53. World Medical Association: Editorial Policy Committee. WAME Policy Statements. The Relationship Between Journal Editors-in-Chief and Owners (formerly titled Editorial Independence). http://www.wame.org/resources/policies#responsibilities. Junio 19, 2000; versión modificada mayo 15, 2006 Accesado: mayo 17, 2007.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com