Bosques PFJ, Gómez AD

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 182-186
PDF size: 344.20 Kb.

Text Extraction

No abstract

REFERENCES

1. Barré R, Papon P. Indicadores: finalidad y límites. En: UNESCO, editores. Informe mundial sobre la ciencia. Madrid: Santillana, 1993;pp:134-6.

2. Braun T, Glänzel W, Maczelka H, Schubert A. World science in the eighties. National performances in publication output and citation impact, 1985-89 versus 1980-84. Part II. Life Sciences, Engineering, and Mathematics. Scientometrics 1994;31:3-30.

3. Braun T, Glänzel W, Grupp H. The scientometric weight of 50 nations in 27 science areas, 1989-93. Part II. Life Sciences. Scientometrics 1995;34:207-37.

4. Herbertz H, Müller-Hill B. Quality and efficiency of basic research in molecular biology: a bibliometric analysis of thirteen excellent research institutes. Research Policy 1995;24:959-79.

5. Sancho R. Indicadores bibliométricos utilizados en la evaluación de la ciencia y la tecnología. Revista Española de Documentación Científica 1990;13:842-65.

6. Luukkonen T. Bibliometrics and evaluation of research performance. Ann Med 1990;22:145-50.

7. Kostoff RN. Research requirements for research impact assessment. Research Policy 1995;24:869-82.

8. Garfield E. How can impact factors be improved? BMJ 1996;313:411-3.

9. Cami J. Impactolatría: diagnóstico y tratamiento. Med Clin (Barc) 1997;109:515-24.

10. Garfield E. Journal impact factor: a brief review. CMAJ 1999;161:979-80.

11. Cho M, Gastel B, Marusic A, Mandel JS, et al. Publishing in developing countries: problems and solutions. CBE Views 1999;22:198.

12. Gibbs WW. Lost science in the third world. Sci Am 1995;76-83.

13. Arribalzaga EB. El idioma y el factor de impacto de las revistas científicas. South Am J Thorac Surg 2000;6:25-29.

14. Seglen PO. Why the impact factors of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ 1997;314:497-503.

15. Golder W. The impact factor: a critical analysis. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 1998;169:220-6.