medigraphic.com
Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del Estado

2009, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Esp Med Quir 2009; 14 (1)

Bilateral tubarian occlusion

Vega DG, Fernández MJM, Vázquez LAA

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 17-21
PDF size: 234.15 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To compare the efficacy of electrofulguration in bilateral tubal occlusion versus Pomeroy’s.
Patients and methods: The study included 60 female patients with satisfied fertility, divided into two groups. Group A with 30 patients, who were submitted to bilateral proximal tubarian occlusion by means of laparoscopic electrofulguration. Group B with 30 patients who also underwent tubarian occlusion by means of Pomeroy technique. There were assessed: patient age, amount of bleeding, surgical time, route of approach and hospital stay.
Results: Group A showed an average age of 33.7 years and group B 32.2 years. Group A presented 43.60 mL of bleeding and group B 39.66 mL. The operative time for Group A was 23.83 minutes and Group B 28.16 minutes. All patients in group A underwent laparoscopic intervention. Group B underwent suprapubic, and infraumbilical approach in 66.3 and 33.6%, respectively. All patients in both groups were hospitalized for 24 hours after procedure.
Conclusions: No significant difference between the two groups in terms of quantity of bleeding and surgical time, age and hospital stay were found.


REFERENCES

  1. Gaviño F. Estudio de los cambios menstruales, hormonales y sexuales posteriores a la salpingoclasia. Tesis CMN 20 Nov. México, 1984;pp:1-41.

  2. Historia de los métodos de control de natalidad. Planned Parenthood, Federation of America, 2006.

  3. Norma Oficial Mexicana de los Servicios de Planificación Familiar. NOM005-SSA 2-1993. D.O., 30 de mayo de 1994.

  4. Peterson HB. Sterilization. Obstet Gynecol 2008;111(1):189-203.

  5. Programa de salud reproductiva y planificación familiar 1995-2000. Diario Oficial de la Federación, 13 de septiembre de 1996.

  6. Bonilla F, Zamudio E, Cázares M. Factores de expulsión del dispositivo intrauterino tcu380a aplicado en puerperio inmediato y tardío. Rev Med IMSS 2005;43(1):5-10.

  7. Aradhya K, Best K, Sokal D. Recent developments in vasectomy. BMJ 2005;330(5):296-9.

  8. Hirsch, HA, Kaser O. Atlas de cirugía ginecológica. 5a ed. Madrid: Marbán, 1997;pp:67-75.

  9. Monrozies X, Perineau M, Ayoubi J. Esterilización tubárica. Enciclopedia médica quirúrgica, ginecología y obstetricia, 2006;2(738-A-20):1-12.

  10. Gilstrap LC, Cunningham FG, Dorsen VJP. Urgencias en la sala de partos y obstetricia quirúrgica. 2a ed. Madrid: Panamericana, 2004;pp:379-96.

  11. Ahued A, Fernández C, Bailon R. Ginecología y obstetricia aplicadas. 2a ed. México: Manual Moderno, 2003;pp:147-65.

  12. Varma R, Gupta J. Predicting negligence in female sterilization failure using time interval to sterilization failure: analysis of 131 cases. Hum Reprod 2007;22(9):2437-43.

  13. Velasco V, Padilla I, De la Cruz L y col. Salud reproductiva. Rev Med IMSS 2006;44(Supl. 4):S87-S95.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com