Velasco-Rodríguez R, Chávez-Acevedo AM, Hernández-Torres E, Carrillo-García CV, Benuto-Rivera AI, Madrigal-Bravo DC

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 25-28
PDF size: 46.17 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: in education it is important that teachers consider in their practice the Mental Representation Systems (MRS) as perceptual access to information channels (vision, hearing, movement), this helps better in effective student learning.
Objective: to characterize the MRS used by nursing students from the University of Colima and South University Center of University of Guadalajara than to educate under different pedagogic models.
Methodology: sectional descriptive study comparing two groups of nursing students from the University of Colima and the South University Center, University of Guadalajara, in which we applied an instrument of 15 multiple choice questions, drawn and appropriate from other instruments previously validated to determine the most commonly used MRS in its formation. The instrument was piloted with 30 students from two different faculties, doing minimal modifications. The results were analyzed by descriptive statistics and χ² square using the Office Excel 2003.
Results: the most commonly used MRS in the student population of both institutions was the visual with 48.80%, followed by auditory 31.42% and kinesthetic 8.80%. Analyzed by institution (UdC/UdG) we have the following: visual (50/47.66%), auditory (30/32.71%) and kinesthetic (9.2/8.4%).
Conclusions: choice of a mental representation system that promotes learning and knowledge acquisition is not determined by pedagogical models where students are trained nurses.

REFERENCES

1. Kandel ER. Principios de neurociencia. 4 ed. Madrid: McGraw-Hill-Interamericana, 2001.

2. Giraldo Botero C, Bedoya Hernández DY. los estilos de aprendizaje desde el modelo V.A.K. y su incidencia en el rendimiento académico en niños y niñas de grado 5º de primaria en diferentes estratos socioeconómicos en la ciudad de Pereira, Colombia. Rev Elec Educ Psicol. 2006; No. 4. [En línea] http://www.utp.edu.co/repes/unicoHTML.php?id=53 [Consultado 27/04/2011].

3. Universidad de Colima. Antología aprender a aprender. México: Universidad de Colima, Dirección General de Orientación Educativa y Vocacional, 2002.

4. Romo Aliste ME, López Real D, López Bravo I. ¿Eres visual, auditivo o kinestésico? Estilos de aprendizaje desde el modelo de la Programación Neurolingüística (PNL). Rev Iberoam Educ. 2004;38:1-8. [En línea] http://www.rieoei.org/deloslectores/1274Romo.pdf [Consultado 27/04/2011].

5. Aprender a aprender: Características de los sistemas de representación. [En línea] http://www.galeon.com/aprenderaaprender/vak/vakcaract.htm Consultado 27/04/2011].

6. Díaz Barriga A. Ensayos sobre la problemática curricular. México: Trillas, 1996. pp. 25.

7. Neisser U. Cognitive Physiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1967.

8. Cazau P. Algunos test de estilos de aprendizaje. [En línea] http://www.rmm.cl/biblio/doc/200308051220120.ALGUNOS%20TESTS%20DE%20ESTILOS%20DE%20APRENDIZAJE.doc [Consultado 27/04/2011].

9. Cazau P. La programación neurolingüística. [En línea] http://www.archivo.iered.org/ .../2005-03-08_Programación-Neurolinguistica.doc – Colombia/ [Consultado 27/04/2011].

10. Fontalvo H, Iriarte F, Domínguez E, Ricardo C, Ballesteros B, Muñoz V, Campo JD. Diseño de ambientes virtuales de enseñanza aprendizaje y sistemas hipermedia adaptativos basados en modelos de estilos de aprendizaje. Zona Próxima. 2007; 8:42-61. [En línea] http://rcientificas.uninorte.edu.co/index.php/zona/article/viewFile/1665/1086 [Consultado 27/04/2011].